metric reduction15 provided 15, a single isomer according
to Mosher ester analysis. Propargyl alcohol 15 was trans-
formed into the allene by the Myers16 procedure, and the
PMB group was then removed (f16). Oxidation of 16 to
the aldehyde, addition of acetylide to give the propargyl
alcohols (17/18, dr ) 1:1), oxidation of this mixture to the
corresponding ynone, and then CBS17 reduction gave 18.
The behavior of allene 18 upon oxidation was one of our
central chemical interrogatives. We reasoned that dimethyl
dioxirane (DMDO) would oxidize an allene more rapidly
than an alkyne (e.g., 5, 17, and 18).18 Furthermore, the
oxygen substituent (PO in 5) should deactivate the proximal
allenic double bond and thereby induce regioselective
oxidation of the distal double bond,19 which should occur
from the most accessible face. The second oxidation should
occur on the face opposite the sterically demanding tert-
butyl-like appendage.20 Certain allenic alcohols spontane-
ously cyclize to give pyrans upon oxidation,21 and the
corresponding SDE intermediates are not observed. Accord-
ingly, we expected oxidation of 18, and related allenes, to
proceed rapidly and selectively.
Scheme 5. Spirodiepoxide Cyclization Model
with the analogous conformers of the diastereomeric SDE
derived from 18 (21a and 21b). Conformational preferences,
perhaps reinforced by hydrogen bonding, may render 21a
stable. Moreover, the reactive conformer (21b) may be
further destabilized by unfavorable steric interactions between
the alkyne and the SDE. The combined effect could account
for the observed resistance of this SDE toward cyclization.
Analogous conformers of diastereomeric secondary alcohol
(17a) would be disfavored due to severe steric interactions,
whereas 17b would be favored and lead to product. This
model would also predict that cyclization of the SDE derived
from 16 would be faster than the SDE derived from 18, as
observed. Indeed, conditions expected to disrupt hydrogen
bonding induced cyclization of the otherwise stable SDE
deriVed from 18. Thus, after complete oxidation, addition
of methanol as cosolvent to the mixture effected the slow
(12 h) conversion of 18 to trans-pyran 22 in 72% yield.24
Scheme 6 presents the preparation of a suite of related
pyrans en route to psymberin, which are also related to the
trioxadecalin system of more complex pederins (cf. 3 and
4). Stereoselective reduction25 of 22 gave the trans-diol 23,
which was converted directly to the epoxide (24) under the
action of sodium hydride and toluenesulfonyl chloride,
provided that wet THF was used as solvent.26 Reduction of
the epoxide27 and then treatment with MOM-Cl gave 25.
Hydroboration of 25 (f26), introduction of C17-C18 by
asymmetric aldol addition,28 conversion to the Weinreb
amide,29 and silylation were followed by reduction30 to
aldehyde 28.
During protecting group optimization studies,22 oxidation
of allenes of type 16 led directly to pyrans 19 and oxidation
of allenes of type 17 led directly to cis-substituted pyrans
20 (Scheme 4). The cyclizations, although unoptimized, were
Scheme 4. Spirodiepoxide Cyclization
efficient (50-70% yield), and no SDE was observed.
Remarkably, oxidation of allenes of type 18 gaVe stable
spirodiepoxides (e.g., 21).23
Presumably, these configuration-dependent cyclizations
reflect conformational biases. Two conformers of the SDE
derived from 17 (17a and 17b) are shown in Scheme 5 along
(15) Matsumura, K.; Hashiguchi, S.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 8738. Ru catalyst ) {[(1S,2S)-TsDPEN]RuCl(η6-p-
cymene)}.
(16) Myers, A. G.; Zheng, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4492.
(17) (a) Corey, E. J.; Bakshi, R. K.; Shibata, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,
109, 1797. (b) Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
1986.
(18) Murray, R. W.; Singh, M. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5076.
(19) (a) Henbest, H. B. Proc. Chem. Soc. 1963, 159. (b) Chamberlin,
P.; Roberts, M. L.; Whitham, G. H. J. Chem. Soc. (B) 1970, 1374.
(20) For a steric model of allene oxidation, see: (a) Katukojvala, S.;
Barlett, K. N.; Lotesta, S. D.; Williams, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
15348. (b) Crandall, J. K.; Batal, D. J.; Sebesta, D. P.; Lin, F. J. Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 1153.
(21) Crandall, J. K.; Batal, D. J.; Lin, F.; Reix, T.; Nadol, G. S.; Ng, R.
A. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 1427.
(22) The TBDPS protecting group, in contrast to TBS and MOM, was
found to be optimal for the sequence 14f21.
(23) The SDE was stable to analytical thin-layer chromatography and
standing in solution for three days, whereas flash column chromatography
induced decomposition of the SDE to several products.
(24) Minor products were observed but do not appear to be simple
diastereomeric pyrans. The methanol adduct was observed as a minor
product (<5%) when the reaction was run on a large scale (∼3 g).
(25) Evans, D.; Clark, J.; Metternich, R.; Novack, V.; Sheppard, G. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 866.
(26) When dry THF was used, the tosylate was obtained.
(27) Kim, S.; Ko, H.; Lee, T.; Kim, D. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5756.
(28) Evans, D. A.; Takacs, J. M.; Mcgee, L. R.; Ennis, M. D.; Mathre,
D. J.; Bartolli, L. Pure Appl. Chem. 1981, 53, 1109.
(29) Evans, D. A.; Bender, S. L.; Morris, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 2506.
(30) Evans, D. A.; Kaldor, S. W.; Jones, T. K.; Clardy, J.; Stout, T. J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7001.
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 6, 2007
1095