2256
M. Yotsu-Yamashita et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 2255–2259
Figure 1. Structures of polycavernoside A, C (1), C2 (2), and the models (3a,b) of the aglycon of 1 and 2.
structure as that in PB4 (O-2,3,4-tri-O-methylfucopyran-
oyl-(100-30)-O-4-acetyl-O-2-methylxylopyranosyl)
was
close 1H NMR chemical shifts of the signals correspond-
ing to 2-CH2 (2.22/2.62), 8-CH2 (2.19/2.85), and H15
(4.92) of 2 to those in PA, 2-CH2 (2.14/2.52), 8-CH2
(2.07/2.97) and H15 (5.00), respectively. All these data
led to the planar structures of 1 and 2 (Fig. 1) and
assignments of their NMR data (Table 1).
suggested in 1, while the same disaccharide structure
as that in PA34 (O-2,3,4-tri-O-methylfucopyranoyl-(100-
30)-O-2,4-dimethylxylopyranosyl) was suggested in 2,
1
by the agreement of the H NMR chemical shifts (the
3
difference was less than 0.03 ppm) and JHH values of
H10-H50 and H100-H600 signals of 1 and 2 (Table 1) with
those of the sugar parts of PB and PA3, respectively.
1H–1H COSY of 1 and 2 suggested that these com-
pounds have a common aglycon structure which was
distinctly different from the aglycon of PA and other
reported analogs. Partial structures of H2–H8, H10–H13,
H15–H23,28, H10–H50, and H100–H600 of 2 were deduced
The relative configurations of 1 and 2 between the tetra-
hydropyrane part (C2–C8) and the disaccharides were
determined based on the reported data by Fujiwara
et al.11 They synthesized both enantiomers of the
C2–C8 part and coupled with the disaccharide of PA.
Between these glycosides, the chemical shifts of H5
and H6a were most different (approximately 0.1 ppm),
and those of one enantiomer were well agreed with those
of PA. Thus, the good agreement of the chemical shifts
of H5 [1 (3.38), 2 (3.38), and PA (3.33)] and those of H6a
[1 (1.32), 2 (1.38) and PA (1.37)] suggested the same rel-
ative configurations in 1, 2, and PA. However, the com-
bination between the northern part (C10–15) and the
southern part (C2–C8) of the aglycon of 1 and 2, and
the stereochemistry of C10 and C13 were kept unknown,
since sufficient NOE data of 2 were not obtained.
1
1
from analyses of H–1H COSY and TOCSY. A H sig-
nal at 2.96 ppm (d 10.2 Hz) coupling with a methyl
substituted methine 1H at 2.01 ppm (H11) showed corre-
lation with the 13C signal at 94 ppm in the HSQC spec-
1
trum. This H signal was assignable to H10, suggesting
that C10 hemiacetal in PA was reduced to oxymethine
in 2. The upfield shifts of the signals corresponding to
H11, H12a, H12b, and H13 of 2 (0.75, 0.72, 0.83, and
0.90 ppm, respectively) (Table 1) from those of PA1 sup-
ported that the five membered cyclohemiacetal ring
formed by C10–C13 in PA was opened and the hemiac-
etal was reduced in 2. A deuterium exchangeable proton
signal at 1.71 ppm (d 12.0 Hz) coupling with H13 was
assigned to 13-OH. Compared with the signals of PA,
the signals corresponding to H3, H7, and H8a of 2 were
downfield shifted (0.12, 0.32, 0.12 ppm, respectively),
and the signal corresponding to H8b was 0.12 ppm
upfield shifted. However, the same partial structure of
C2–C8 in 2 as that in PA including a tetrahydropyrane
ring was suggested by the similar coupling patterns of
H2–H8. Due to the small sample size of 2, the HSQC
To determine them, keto lactone 3a (10S, 13R) and C10-
epimeric 3b (10R,13R) (Fig. 1) were planned to be syn-
thesized as the models of aglycon of 1 and 2 from 4a and
4b (C10-epimer of 4a), respectively (Scheme 1). 4a and
4b are the synthetic intermediates of PA.5 The stereo-
chemistry of C13 in 1 and 2 was hypothesized in R as
same as in PA based on biosynthetic aspect. Selective
protection of the primary alcohol of diol 4a with
TBDPS, followed by methylation of secondary alcohol
5a and deprotection of TBDPS with TBAF afforded
alcohol 7a (Scheme 1). Swern oxidation of 7a with work-
up process under the acidic condition gave methyl acetal
hydrolyzed aldehyde 8a. By following the method used
for total synthesis of PA,5 secoic acid 10a obtained by
deprotection of PMB in 8a with DDQ and by subse-
quent NaClO2 oxidation was lactonized by modified
Yamaguchi’s method.12 NMR spectra of the product
in CDCl3 containing trace amount of HCl indicated
C10-epimerized keto lactone 3b, probably formed via
acetal lactone 11a. Detail analysis of stereochemistry
of C10 of this keto lactone (3b) was described below.
Similarly from 4b (10-epimer of 4a), corresponding sec-
oic acid was derived by the same way. In this case,
methyl acetal was not hydrolyzed by workup process
of Swern oxidation. After lactonization of the secoic
1
spectrum showed only partial H–13C correlations. For
the same reason, the HMBC spectrum clarified the con-
nectivities only around methyl groups by giving cross
2,3
peaks due to
J
between C10/10–OMe, C10/Me25,
CH
C11/Me25, C3/Me24, C4/Me24, C5/Me24, C14/Me26,
C14/Me27, C15/Me26, C15/Me27, C26/Me27, C27/
Me26, C400/Me600, C500/Me600, C20/20–OMe, C200/200–
OMe, C300/300–OMe, and C400/400–OMe. Among them,
the cross peak C10/Me25 supported the connectivity
of C10 and C11, and that C10/10–OMe indicated that
C10 bears a methoxy group. The presence of carbonyl
carbons at C1 and C9 and formation of lactone between
C1 and C15 were not evident from HMBC correlations.
However, these structural features were suggested by the