2934 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 12, 2001
Communications to the Editor
Table 1. Epoxidations of Representative Alkenes
that are amenable to process chemistry, and no halogenated liquids
or ones with low flash points are required. No organic ligands or
additives are used, and this facilitates isolation of the desired
epoxide.
It is difficult to be certain that the process reported here is
completely unprecedented because studies involving transition-
metal salts and hydrogen peroxide are so ubiquitous.5 However,
it is clear that these Mn-catalyzed reactions are much cleaner than
Fenton’s6 and related systems that generate hydroxyl radicals.7
Several groups have reported epoxidation reactions using H2O2
mediated by TACN-manganese complexes,8,9 but the catalysts
tend to be relatively inaccessible or require larger excesses of
hydrogen peroxide.9-11 One of these studies mentions MnCl2 as
a control, and epoxidation activity was detected, but this finding
was not exploited.10 Most importantly, in prior studies of metal-
catalyzed epoxidations the special importance of bicarbonate in
the media has either not been investigated, realized, or empha-
sized. Investigations to elucidate the role of bicarbonate are in
-
progress. Our working hypothesis is that percarbonate (HCO4
)
formed in situ12 combines with the manganese to give the active
intermediate.
Nearly all of the existing methods for using hydrogen peroxide
as an epoxidation reagent have clear disadvantages compared with
the one reported here. For instance, most of them involve acidic
reagents that tend to decompose the epoxide products.13 One not-
able exception is catalytic methyltrioxorhenium (MTO)14 buffered
with pyridine.15 However, that procedure features a much more
expensive catalyst and media that are explosive or environmentally
hazardous, that is, nitromethane or dichloromethane. Moreover,
separation of acid-sensitive epoxides from pyridine is likely to
be inconvenient for many substrates. On the other hand, the
protocol reported here requires 10 equiv of H2O2 to drive the
reaction to completion, whereas near stoichiometric amounts are
used in the MTO/pyridine method. The two procedures are
(4) Large-Scale Synthesis of Cyclooctene Oxide: DMF (1.68 L) and MnSO4
(1.69 g, 0.01 mol) were placed in a 12 L three-neck flask, equipped with a
mechanical stirrer and a vent to an oil bubbler. Cyclooctene (110 g, 1.00 mol)
was added all at once. The flask was then placed in a water bath at 20 °C
(cryocooler). A 3 L two-neck flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer, was
charged with 20.6 g of NaHCO3, 0.123 g of Na2CO3, and 1.2 L of H2O, and
the pH of the resulting solution was adjusted to 8.0 with 1 M HCl. The flask
was then placed into a water bath maintained at 1 °C and then 1.1 L of 30%
H2O2 was added all at once. The aqueous solution of buffer/peroxide was
then added dropwise to the DMF solution over a period of 36 h via a cannula.
CAUTION! The reaction exotherms if the buffer/peroxide solution is added
too quickly or if heat transfer from the receiving flask is inadequate to maintain
the desired temperature. The reaction mixture was extracted into Et2O (900
mL × 4), washed with brine (900 mL), and dried (Na2SO4). The organic
fraction was concentrated, and residual DMF was fractionally distilled from
it at 5 mmHg. The final product was purified via bulb-to-bulb distillation at
5 mmHg and 57 °C oven temperature, 84.5 g, mp ) 53-55 °C. Small-Scale
Epoxidation Procedure: Similar to the above except that 23 mL of DMF and
17 mL of 0.2 M NaHCO3(aq) were used per 1 mmol of substrate. The aqueous
mixture of H2O2 and NaHCO3 was added dropwise over a period of 16 h.
(5) Jones, C. W. Applications of Hydrogen Peroxide and DeriVatiVes; MPG
Books Ltd.: Cornwall, UK, 1999.
a Unless otherwise specified, the reactions were performed using 0.01
equiv of MnSO4 on a 1 mmol scale; yields determined by NMR or GC
versus an internal standard. b 0.1 mol scale. c The corresponding
anthraquinone (35%) was also observed. d trans-3-Phenylpropenal was
also observed (16%). et BuOH used in place of DMF. f Isolated as the
methyl ester. g 0.001 equiv of MnSO4 were used. h 1 mol scale.
(6) Boguslavskaya, L. S. Russ. Chem. ReV. 1965, 34, 503-15.
(7) Sheldon, R. A.; Kochi, J. K. Metal-Catalyzed Oxidations of Organic
Compounds; Academic Press: New York, 1981.
(8) Vos, D. E. D.; Meinershagen, J. L.; Bein, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1996, 35, 2211-3; Vos, D. E. D.; Sels, B. F.; Reynaers, M.; Rao, Y.
V. S.; Jacobs, P. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3221-4.
(9) Bolm, C.; Kadereit, D.; Valacchi, M. Synlett 1997, 687-8.
complementary insofar as aliphatic terminal alkenes are epoxi-
dized by MTO/pyridine, whereas selective epoxidation of the
nonterminal alkenes in the presence of monosubstituted, aliphatic
alkenes is possible in the Mn-catalyzed reactions. In summary,
the epoxidation protocol presented here has the potential to fulfill
unmet needs in exploratory syntheses and large-scale reactions.
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. D. E. Richardson, University of
Florida, for helpful discussions. This research was supported by The
Robert A. Welch Foundation.
Supporting Information Available: Outlines of optimization pro-
cedures, pilot kinetic study to show dependence of reaction rate on
manganese concentration (PDF). This material is available free of charge
(10) Hage, R.; Iburg, J. E.; Kerschner, J.; Koek, J. H.; Lempers, E. L. M.;
Martens, R. J.; Racheria, U. S.; Russell, S. W.; Swarthoff, T.; Vliet, M. R. P.
v.; Warnaar, J. B.; Wolf, L. v. d.; Krijnen, B. Nature 1994, 369, 637-9.
(11) Quee-Smith, V. C.; DelPizzo, L.; Jureller, S. H.; Kerschner, J. L.;
Hage, R. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 6461-5; Vos, D. D.; Bein, T. Chem.
Commun. 1996, 917-8; Vos, D. E. D.; Wildeman, S. d.; Sels, B. F.; Grobet,
P. J.; Jacobs, P. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 980-3; Brinksma, J.;
Hage, R.; Kerschner, J.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. Commun. 2000, 537-8.
(12) Richardson, D. E.; Yao, H.; Frank, K. M.; Bennett, D. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 1729-39.
(13) Jorgensen, K. A. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 431-58; Sato, K.; Aoki, M.;
Ogawa, M.; Hashimoto, T.; Noyori, R. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8310-1.
(14) Herrmann, W. A.; Fischer, R. W.; Marz, D. W. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1638-41.
(15) Rudolph, J.; Reddy, K. L.; Chiang, J. P.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 6189-90; Adolfsson, H.; Converso, A.; Sharpless, K. B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3991-4.
JA004000A