Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Organocatalysis
Catalytic Enantioselective Aza-Piancatelli Rearrangement
Huilin Li, Rongbiao Tong, and Jianwei Sun*
Abstract: An efficient organocatalytic enantioselective aza-
Piancatelli rearrangement is disclosed. The powerful process
provides rapid access to valuable chiral 4-amino-2-cyclo-
pentenone building blocks from readily available 2-furfuryl-
carbinols with excellent chemo-, enantio-, and diastereoselec-
tivities under mild reaction conditions.
T
he Piancatelli rearrangement, first discovered in 1976,[1]
represents one of most direct strategies to access highly
functionalized 2-cyclopentenones, a family of valuable struc-
tural units (Scheme 1).[2,3] The power of this reaction has also
been demonstrated in the synthesis of a range of useful
Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism and asymmetric induction for the
aza-Piancatelli rearrangement.
Nevertheless, intrigued by the presence of hydrogen-bonding
sites in the key intermediate IV and the possible asymmetric
induction by a chiral counter anion, we envisioned that chiral
Brønsted acids might be able to render these reactions
asymmetric.[9]
The aza-Piancatelli rearrangement, in which an amine is
used as a nucleophile, was first used to test our hypothesis,
partly because IV is an imine/iminium in nature, whose
asymmetric induction by hydrogen bonding/counter anions
has been established.[10] Another asset of this process is the
valuable utility of the 4-amino-2-cyclopentenone products.
They themselves and their simple derivatives are ubiquitous
substructures in numerous natural products and pharmaceuti-
cally important molecules, such as stemonamine, homohar-
ringtonine, etc.[11]
We began our study with 2-furfurylcarbinol (1a) as the
representative substrate and aniline (2a) as the nucleophile.
Chiral phosphoric acids were employed as catalysts in view of
their superior performance in asymmetric induction of imines
and iminiums.[10] Unfortunately, at room temperature, the
representative catalyst (R)-A1 (TRIP) could not promote the
reaction between 1a and 2a in acetonitrile, which is the best
solvent for most racemic examples (Table 1, entry 1).[5] The
reaction could proceed slowly at 808C, but no desired product
3a was observed. Indeed, the only product was 3a’, which was
formed by exocyclic addition of the amine nucleophile to the
intermediate I (Scheme 2).[5k] We reasoned that the weak
basicity of acetonitrile might reduce the catalyst activity by
competitive binding. In fact, the same reaction in DCM
proceeded with good conversion at room temperature,
although the major product was still 3a’. Encouragingly, the
desired product 3a was observed, albeit in low yield and with
moderate enantioselectivity (Table 1, entry 2). Further
screening of different phosphoric acid catalysts identified
that (R)-B4[12] provided the best enantioselectivity (84% ee)
and a promising yield of 3a (entry 7). Evaluation of other
parameters indicated that the enantioselectivity could be
further improved with DCE as the solvent at a 0.025m
concentration (entries 9–14). It is known that 3a’ can be
Scheme 1. The general Piancatelli rearrangement.
molecules, including cyclopentenone prostaglandins.[3,4] As
a result, in the past few decades the prototype reaction,
initially with water as a nucleophile and promoted by
a stoichiometric amount of acid, has been extended to
a large family of catalytic transformations which are compat-
ible with various internal and external nucleophiles, thus
providing rapid access to more diversely substituted cyclo-
pentenones (Scheme 1).[5–7] A range of catalytic systems,
including those based on Lewis acids, such as Dy(OTf)3,
Ca(NTf2)2, and In(OTf)3, have also been developed for these
reactions. However, it is important to note that all these
reactions are racemic. A catalytic enantioselective version of
this reaction has remained as an unmet but highly desirable
goal.
Mechanistically, the Piancatelli rearrangement process
involves a series of bond-formation and bond-cleavage steps
together with ring-opening and ring-closing events
(Scheme 2).[8] It is believed that the key 4p conrotatory
electrocyclization step (IV to V) determines both diastereo-
and enantioselectivity. However, the stereocontrol in this key
step is expected to be challenging because of the limited
defined stereochemistry in the linear precursor IV, as well as
the elusive interaction with chiral metal/ligand systems.
[*] Dr. H. Li, Prof. R. Tong, Prof. J. Sun
Department of Chemistry
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR (China)
E-mail: sunjw@ust.hk
Supporting information for this article can be found under:
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 5
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1
These are not the final page numbers!