A R T I C L E S
Nicolaou et al.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Terpenoids 17a and 17ba
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Propargyl Alcohol 26a
a Reagents and conditions: (a) DMP (2.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, 25 °C, 5 h,
92%; (b) acetylene, n-BuLi, THF, -78 °C, 1 h, 92%, 3:1 d.r.; (c) 3,5-
dinitrobenzoyl chloride (1.2 equiv), Et3N (1.2 equiv), 4-DMAP (0.1 equiv),
CH2Cl2, 25 °C, 3 h, 98%. DMP ) Dess-Martin periodinane; 4-DMAP )
4-dimethylaminopyridine.
choice of these particular enantiomeric forms of 17a and 17b
was based on the assumption that the hyperolactone C structural
motif of biyouyanagin A would be of the same absolute
configuration as the naturally occurring hyperolactone C,6 a
postulate that, in turn, suggested the absolute configuration of
the terpenoid fragments as shown.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) 19a or 19b (1.0 equiv), MVK (1.5 equiv),
20 (5 mol%), ethyl 3,4-dihydroxybenzoate (20 mol%), 0 °C, 24 h; then
KOH (0.1 N aq., 1.0 equiv), n-Bu4NOH (40% aq., cat.), Et2O/THF/H2O
(3:1:3), reflux, 6 h, 72% yield, 93% de for 22a; 68% yield, 86% de for
22b; (b) KHMDS (1.5 equiv), THF, -78 °C, 3 h; then Comins reagent
(1.5 equiv), THF, -78 °C, 1 h; (c) MeMgI (3.0 M in Et2O, 1.5 equiv), CuI
(2 mol%), THF, 0 °C, 15 min, 80% over the two steps. MVK ) methyl
vinyl ketone; THF ) tetrahydrofuran; KHMDS ) potassium hexamethyl-
disilazanide; Tf ) trifluoromethanesulfonyl.
The synthesis of the terpenoid fragments 17a (ent-7-epi-
zingiberene) and 17b (ent-zingiberene) begun from (S)-citronel-
lal (19a) and (R)-citronellal (19b), respectively, and proceeded
according to the sequence depicted in Scheme 1. Thus, enamine-
mediated 1,4-addition of (S)-citronellal (19a) to methyl vinyl
ketone (MVK) facilitated by the proline-derived catalyst 20 (5
mol%)8 and ethyl 3,4-dihydroxybenzoate (21) as a cocatalyst
(20 mol%)9 furnished, after an intramolecular aldol condensation
(KOH, n-Bu4NOH cat.) of the resulting ketoaldehyde product,
24(S) enone 22a in 72% overall yield and 93% de. The
conversion of the latter compound to the desired building block
17a (ent-7-epi-zingiberene) proceeded smoothly and in 80%
overall yield through a Kumada coupling of the corresponding
vinyl triflate (KHMDS, Comins reagent)10 with MeMgI (CuI
cat.).11 A similar route starting from (R)-citronellal (19b) and
MVK, and proceeding through intermediate enone 22b (68%
yield, and 86% de), furnished ent-zingiberene (17b), the other
targeted terpenoid fragment (80% overall yield for the last two
steps).
background that we embarked on the synthetic journey to
biyouyanagin A, whose true structure became our immediate
puzzle to solve.
Construction of Building Blocks for Biyouyanagin A. Having
defined the required building blocks for the devised [2 + 2]
photocycloaddition strategy toward biyouyanagin A, their
construction evolved as shown in Scheme 1 (17a: ent-7-epi-
zingiberene and 17b: ent-zingiberene) and Schemes 2 and 3
(18: hyperolactone C). Interestingly, hyperolactone C (18) is
already known in the literature as a naturally occurring sub-
stance,6 while 17a and 17b are enantiomers of natural terpenes
(7-epi-zingiberene and zingiberene, respectively).7 The initial
The synthesis of hyperolactone C (18, Scheme 2)6e began
with (S)-malic acid (23) and proceeded, sequentially, through
lactone 26 (Scheme 2) and spirolactone intermediate 27 (Scheme
4). As shown in Scheme 2, (S)-malic acid was converted in
five steps, and by literature procedures,6e to hydroxy lactone
24, which was oxidized with DMP to ketolactone 25 in 92%
yield. The latter compound reacted with lithium acetylide
(generated from acetylene and n-BuLi in THF at -78 °C) to
afford, stereoselectively, propargylic alcohol 26 (92% yield, ca.
(6) For selected papers on hyperolactone C, see: (a) Isolation and
structure: Aramaki, Y.; Chiba, K.; Tada, M. Phytochemistry 1995,
38, 1419–1421. (b) X-ray structure: Crockett, S. L.; Schuhly, W.; Belaj,
F.; Khan, I. A. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E 2004, 60, o2174-o2176.
(c) Synthesis: Ichinari, D.; Ueki, T.; Yoshihara, K.; Kinoshita, T. Chem.
Commun. 1997, 1743–1743. (d) Ueki, T.; Ichinari, D.; Yoshihara, K.;
Morimoto, Y.; Kinoshita, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 667–668.
(e) Ueki, T.; Doe, M.; Tanaka, R.; Morimoto, Y.; Yoshihara, K.;
Kinoshita, T. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2001, 38, 165–172. (f) Kraus, G. A.;
Wei, J. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 1039–1040.
(7) For selected papers on zingiberenes, see: (a) Eschenmoser, A.; Schinz,
H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1950, 33, 171–177. (b) Arigoni, D.; Jeger, O.
HelV. Chim. Acta 1954, 37, 881–883. (c) Joshi, G. D.; Kulkarni, S. N.
Indian J. Chem. 1965, 3, 91–92. (d) Uhde, G.; Ohloff, G. HelV. Chim.
Acta 1972, 55, 2621–2625. (e) Breeden, D. C.; Coates, R. M.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11123–11132. (f) Bhonsle, J. B.; Deshpande,
V. H.; Ravindranathan, T. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 1994, 33, 313–
316.
(8) Enders, D.; Kipphardt, H.; Gerdes, P.; Brena-Valle, L. J.; Bhushan,
V. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1988, 97, 691–704.
(9) Chi, Y.; Gellman, S. H. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4253–4256.
(10) Comins, D. L.; Dehghani, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6299–6302.
(11) Karlstro¨m, A. S. E.; Ro¨nn, M.; Thorarensen, A.; Ba¨ckvall, J.-E. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2517–2522.
9
11116 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 33, 2008