with ease, challenges in the preparation of the stannylated
intermediates often preclude the use of this technology
with unactivated, electron-rich substrates. The most com-
mon method for preparation of benzo-stannylated indoles
entails a preliminary hydrogen or halogenÀlithium ex-
change and subsequent transmetalation with trialkylstan-
nyl chloride.5,9 While effective for simple indoles, these
reactions have very limited functional group tolerance and
more complex derivatives require milder conditions, such as
those associated with palladium catalysis. Palladium-catalyzed
stannylation of the indolic benzo positions, unless the sub-
strate is otherwise activated,10 has posed a difficult synthetic
challenge with most reactions suffering from low yields (less
than 50%) and high catalyst loading (10 mol %).11
Table 1. Selected Optimization Reactions toward the Synthesis
of the 5-/6-Tributylstannyl-1H-indol-3-carbaldehydesa
entry ArX
catalyst
ligand
none
solvent
yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
Pd(PPh3)4
PdCl2dppf
PdCl2dppf
toluene
toluene
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
0
0
none
none
24
82
79
22
0
PdCl2(PhCN)2 PCy3
PdCl2(PhCN)2 dppe
PdCl2(PhCN)2 PCy3
PdCl2(PhCN)2 P(tBu)3
PdCl2(PhCN)2 dppe
Scheme 1. Indirect HalogenÀRadiohalogen Exchange at the
Benzo Positions of Indole Derivatives
60
79
PdCl2(PhCN)2 PCy2bph dioxane
a Unless otherwise noted, reactions were carried out using 1 or 2
(1 equiv), [Pd] (0.05 equiv), ligand (0.1 equiv), and hexa-n-butylditin
(3 equiv) at 110À120 °C under an atmosphere of argon for 12À24 h.
b Isolated yields reported as an average of two runs.
yields of 82% and 79%, respectively. Unlike 1, compound
2 failed to react favorably with the PdCl2(PhCN)2/PCy3
catalytic system, giving 4 in only 22% yield (Table 1,
entry 6). Increasing the basicity of the ligand by use of
P(tBu)3 (Table 1, entry 7) did not promote any formation
of 4, while the use of less basic ligands dppe and PCy2bph
(Table 1, entries 8 and 9) gave 4 in moderate to good yields
(60% and 79%, respectively).
Herein we describe a general method for efficient
palladium-catalyzed C5-/C6-stannylation of indole deri-
vatives which features lower palladium loadings (5 mol %)
and obviates protection of the indolic nitrogen. Our
investigation focused on the preparation of the 5- and
6-tributylstannyl derivatives of three indole scaffolds
featuring electronically diverse C3 substituents: 1H-indole,
indole-3-carbaldehyde, and gramine. The initial steps of
this project pertained to the stannylation of the 5-/6-
bromo-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde derivatives 1 and 2.
Common transmetalation conditions (Table 1, entry 1),
in which 1 was refluxed in toluene with hexabutylditin in
the presence of tetrakis(triphenylphosphine), showed no
evidence of any reaction progress over a period of 24 h.
Similar results were obtained with PdCl2dppf in toluene;
however, the same conditions in dioxane gave the desired
product 3 in a 24% isolated yield (Table 1, entry 3). Use of
more basic ligands, PCy3 and dppe, with PdCl2(PhCN)2 as
the precatalyst (Table 1, entries 4 and 5) gave 3 in increased
We were pleased to discover that PCy3, in conjunction
with either PdCl2(PhCN)2 or Pd2dba3, was capable of
promoting the stannylation of the unsubstituted indoles
5 and 6 to form 7 and 8 in good yields, ranging from
90 to 97%, after only 3 h (Table 2, entries 1, 4, 5, and 8).
Less basic ligands, such as PCy2bph and dppe, gave
only moderate yields after 12 h for both 7 and 8, ranging
from 29 to 58% (Table 2, entries 2, 3, 6, and 7). Unlike the
3-carbaldehyde derivatives, the C3 unsubstituted indole
derivatives demonstrated no appreciable differences be-
tween the C5 and C6 positions with regard to optimal
reaction conditions. Although the preparation of 7 and 8
was accomplished easily under these conditions, the isola-
tion of these compounds posed a challenge because of the
extremely acid-sensitive nature of these compounds. Use
of silica chromatography, despite pretreatment with 5%
triethylamine in hexanes, resulted in substantial hydrodes-
tannylation of 7 and 8 to form unsubstituted 1H-indole.
Similar results were observed using basic alumina chro-
matography. Minimal loss of product during isolation
was achieved by reversed-phase chromatography using
an isocratic acetonitrile mobile phase; use of water during
the reversed-phase purification process also led to signifi-
cant formation of the destannylated byproduct.
(9) Cherry, K.; Lebegue, N.; Leclerc, V.; Carato, P.; Yous, S.;
Berthelot, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5751.
(10) Sheppard, G. S.; Davidsen, S. K.; Carrera, G. M., Jr.; Pireh, D.;
Holms, J. H.; Heyman, H. R.; Steinman, D. H.; Curtin, M. L.; Conway,
R. G.; Rhein, D. A.; Albert, D. H.; Tapang, P.; Magoc, T. J.; Summers,
J. B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1995, 5, 2913.
(11) Yamada, Y.; Akiba, A.; Arima, S.; Okada, C.; Yoshida, K.;
Itou, F.; Kai, T.; Satou, T.; Takeda, K.; Harigaya, Y. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 2005, 53, 1277.
Lastly, we undertook the stannylation of the electron-
rich gramine derivatives 9 and 10. To the best of our
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 17, 2012
4631