Angewandte
Chemie
[Pd(dba)2], AsPh3, and LiCl provided tetraene 19 in 67%
yield. Incorporation of carboxylic acid 4 into the growing
molecule was then facilitated by 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chlo-
ride in the presence of Et3N and DMAP, to furnish ester 20
(61% yield). Conversion of 20 into vinyl iodide 23 was
achieved in three steps: 1) TBAF-induced desilylation to 21,
unambiguously validated its absolute configuration and, thus,
of the natural product.[3] The CD spectra of both synthetic
palmerolide A enantiomers 1b and ent-1b shown in Figure 2,
corresponded with those published for the natural product
and its enantiomer.[3]
2) oxidation with DMP to 22 (79% for the two steps), and
[17]
3) olefination with CrCl2/CHI3
to give 23 in 80% yield.
Removal of the two MOM groups from 23 (BF3·Et2O/
Me2S)[18] led to the desired precursor 24 (46% yield with
10% of recovered mono-MOM intermediates, which were
recycled), thus setting the stage for the much-anticipated ring-
closing metathesis. Gratifyingly, exposure of bisallylic com-
pound 24 to Grubbs II catalyst in CH2Cl2 solution at ambient
temperature led to the smooth and exclusive formation of the
macrocycle 25 (76% yield) with trans geometry at the newly
formed double bond as confirmed by NMR spectroscopy
H–H
(
J =15.5 Hz). Finally, installation of the enamide moiety
8,9
to afford structure 1a was achieved through application of the
Buchwald copper-catalyzed protocol (26, CuI/Cs2CO3/N,N’-
dimethylethylenediamine)[19] in 44% yield based on 36%
recovered starting material and 10% decarbamated 1a.
Although similar, the 1H NMR spectroscopic data of
synthetic 1a did not match those reported[1] for the natural
palmerolide A, with notable differences for H7 and H10. At
this stage we became convinced that the true structure of
palmerolide A must be 19-epi-20-epi-1a (ent-1b) which
became our next target. After reaching ent-1b (from ent-2,
3, and 4, and following the developed synthetic technology),
Figure 2. CD spectra of ent-1b (top, CHCl3, 258C, 0.0013m) and of 1b
(bottom, CHCl3, 258C, 0.0025m).
The described chemistry once again demonstrates the
power of the olefin metathesis reaction in complex molecule
construction,[14b,c] and delivered the originally proposed[1]
structure 1a, the revised structure 1b,[3] and its enantiomer
ent-1b of palmerolide A.[20] Furthermore, the flexibility of the
strategy to deliver either configuration at each stereocenter
allows construction of all stereoisomers of this valuable
substance for biological studies.
1
whose H NMR data corresponded to those reported for the
natural substance, we learned[3] of the revised structure of
palmerolide A (1b), which immediately became our next
priority to synthesize. The total synthesis of 1b was accom-
plished from fragments 2, ent-3, and ent-4 following the same
strategy as that described for the synthesis of 1a (and ent-1b)
as delineated in Scheme 5. The final stages and advanced
intermediates of the total synthesis of 1b are shown in
Scheme 6. Synthetic 1b exhibited identical physical proper-
ties (1H and 13C NMR spectra, and MS) to those reported[1]
for natural palmerolide A. In particular, the identical circular
dichroism (CD) spectrum and sign of optical rotation of
synthetic 1b to those reported for natural palmerolide A
Received: May 21, 2007
Published online: June 28, 2007
Keywords: antitumor agents · macrolides · metathesis ·
.
natural products · total synthesis
[1]T. Diyabalanage, C. D. Amsler, J. B. McClintock, B. J.
Baker, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5630 – 5631.
[2]X.-S. Xie, D. Padron, X. Liao, J. Wang, M. G. Roth, J. K.
De Brabander, J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 19755 – 19763.
[3]X. Jiang, B. Liu, S. Lebreton, J. K. De Brabander, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6386 – 6387.
[4]a) D. A. Evans, J. M. Takacs, L. R. McGee, M. D. Ennis,
D. J. Mathre, J. Bartroli, Pure Appl. Chem. 1981, 53, 1109 –
1127; b) D. A. Evans, J. Bartroli, T. L. Shih, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1981, 103, 2121 – 2129.
[5]a) S. Ma, E. Negishi, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 784 – 785;
b) P. A. Roethle, D. Trauner, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 345 – 347.
[6]S. Shirokawa, M. Kamiyama, T. Nakamura, M. Okada, A.
Nakazaki, S. Hosokawa, S. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 13604 – 13605.
[7]A similar sequence was employed in Ref. [3.]
[8]H. Makabe, M. Higuchi, H. Konno, M. Murai, H. Miyoshi,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 4671 – 4675.
Scheme 6. Final stages of the total synthesis of the revised structure 1b.
Reagents and conditions: a) Grubbs II cat. (0.2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 238C, 1 h,
72%; b) 26 (2.0 equiv), CuI (1.0 equiv), Cs2CO3 (1.0 equiv), N,N’-dimethyl-
ethylenediamine (2.0 equiv), DMF, 238C, 7 h, 50% based on 38% recovered
starting material (+10% of decarbamated 1b).
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5896 –5900
ꢀ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim