An increased understanding of enolate additions under mechanochemical conditions

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules22050696

Very little is known about enolate addition chemistry under solver-free mechanochemical conditions. In this report, we investigated the ability to selectively form products arising from the primary, secondary, and tertiary enolates under solvent-free conditions. Using potassium tert-butoxide as the base and primary, secondary, and tertiary electrophiles, we were able to generate various enolate addition products including, 1,3,3,3-Tetraphenyl-2,2-dimethyl-1-propanone; a molecule we did not observe under traditional solution-based conditions.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules22050696

molecules
Article
An Increased Understanding of Enolate Additions
under Mechanochemical Conditions
Heather Hopgood and James Mack *
Department of Chemistry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0172, USA; hopgoohm@mail.uc.edu
* Correspondence: james.mack@uc.edu; Tel.: +1-513-556-9249
Academic Editor: Davide Ravelli
Received: 29 January 2017; Accepted: 20 April 2017; Published: 27 April 2017
Abstract: Very little is known about enolate addition chemistry under solver-free mechanochemical
conditions. In this report, we investigated the ability to selectively form products arising from the
primary, secondary, and tertiary enolates under solvent-free conditions. Using potassium tert-butoxide
as the base and primary, secondary, and tertiary electrophiles, we were able to generate various
enolate addition products including, 1,3,3,3-tetraphenyl-2,2-dimethyl-1-propanone; a molecule we
did not observe under traditional solution-based conditions.
Keywords: mechanochemistry; green chemistry; enolate; solvent-free
1. Introduction
Enolates are a very powerful synthetic tool for the formation of highly electron-rich carbon atoms
that can serve as nucleophiles. Unlike a Grignard or other organometallic reagents, however, enolate
reactions are not air- or water-sensitive and therefore can be conducted under atmospheric conditions.
Surprisingly, given the importance of enolates in organic synthesis, there are very few examples in
the literature that are conducted under mechanochemical conditions [1–6]. In solution, studies have
shown that enolate reactivity is dependent on a few factors. Rappe and Sachs determined that the rate
of deprotonation of acetone is faster than that of 3-methyl-2-butanone by a factor of approximately 100;
the addition of two methyl groups significantly reduces the availability of the proton for removal [
Additionally, enolate reactivity can be affected by both the solvent and the coordinating ion [ ]. A study
by House et al. indicated that, when using dimethoxyethane, the electron-density on the -carbon to
the carbonyl changes with a different conjugate alkali metal, which affects the amount of C-alkylation
observed in the product [ ]. Jackman and Lange went on to demonstrate that this is largely due to the
7].
8
α
9
formation of ion-pair aggregates. For example, the lithium enolate of isobutyrophenone predominates
as a solvated tetramer in dioxolane. These aggregates facilitate C-alkylation, and it was determined that
softer leaving groups, such as iodide, are more favorable [10]. This trend has shown to be qualitatively
consistent in both the gas phase and in solvent, suggesting that it may not be a solvent-dependent
phenomenon [11].
In order to better understand enolate chemistry under solvent-free mechanochemical conditions,
we sought to carry out various enolate reactions under these unique conditions. Some enolate
reactivity has previously been demonstrated using mechanochemical conditions. Toda et al. reported
the mixed aldol condensation of p-methylbenzaldehyde with acetophenone in the presence of sodium
hydroxide using a mortar and pestle. They found the yield to be higher under solvent-free conditions
than when the reaction was conducted in aqueous ethanol [12]. Bolm, Soloshonok, and co-workers
developed asymmetric variants of enolate reactions using different catalysts under mechanochemical
conditions [6,13]. We previously demonstrated the ability to control kinetic and thermodynamic
enolates using mechanochemistry [14].
Molecules 2017, 22, 696; doi:10.3390/molecules22050696
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules

Molecules 2017, 22, 696
2 of 7
Although enolate reactions have been shown to be favorable using mechanochemistry, little
is known about the addition of electrophiles to enolates under these conditions. In the examples
above, additional products were reported leaving the range of enolate reactivity still unclear. In order
for a more consistent use of enolate chemistry to be conducted under mechanochemical conditions,
these gaps must be addressed.
2. Results and Discussion
We started our study by first trying to understand which bases would be best suited for
solvent-free enolate addition reactions. Using acetophenone and benzyl bromide, we tested several
bases to determine which base gave the highest yield of substitution.
As can be seen from the results in Table 1, typically as base strength increases, so does the
overall yield of the reaction. It is interesting to point out that lithium hexamethyldisilazide is
a stronger base in solution than potassium tert-butoxide, but led to lower enolate addition product
under mechanochemical conditions. This is due to the addition of benzyl bromide to the lithium
hexamethyldisilazide. Similar to what is observed in solution, the diaddition occurs in higher yield
than the mono addition in most cases [15]. From the initial screening of the reaction, potassium
tert-butoxide gave the highest yield of products, so we chose to use potassium tert-butoxide in the
subsequent reactions.
Table 1. Comparison of bases in enolate reactivity.
Entry
Base
Yield
Product Ratio 3aa/4aa
1
2
3
4
5
6
tBuOK
NaNH2
KOH
LiHMDS
NaOH
94%
91%
78%
52%
11%
3%
12/88
12/88
10/90
42/58
36/64
100/0
CS2CO3
LiHMDS: lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide.
Typically in solution, enolate substitution reactions are set up in separate steps to avoid
the competing aldol condensation. We wanted to test how prevalent the aldol condensation
reaction was in comparison to the substitution reaction under mechanochemical conditions.
When we attempted to conduct the enolate reaction using acetophenone stepwise, we observed
3-methyl-1,3,5-triphenyl-1,5-pentadione (7). This is believed to come from an initial aldol condensation
followed by a Michael addition. In order to determine if we could stop the reaction at the aldol
intermediate, we varied the time of the reaction from 2–16 h. At every interval we attempted, we were
unable to observe 3-hydroxy-1,3-diphenylbutan-1-one (5) or dypnone (6) in the reaction mixture.
Since the energetics of our mill has been theorized to be similar to 90 ◦C, it may not be surprising
to observe the rapid loss of water under these conditions [16]. However, given the fact that we did
not observe the α,β-unsaturated ketone, the 1,4 addition might occur at a much faster rate than the
initial aldol condensation. In addition to the 1,5-diketone, we observed other products related to
the 1,2 addition of the enolate with initial Michael addition products [17]. The 1,2 addition of the
α
,
β-unsaturated ketone has been observed under solution conditions as well, but only after trapping
the α,β-unsaturated ketone with diethylboryl-pivalate [18]. This is in stark contrast to solution, where

Molecules 2017, 22, 696
3 of 7
the aldol condensation of acetophenone gives 3-hydroxy-1,3-diphenylbutan-1-one (
(Scheme 1) [19].
5) and dypnone (6)
O
O
O
HO
base
+
solvent
5
6
O
O
O
O
Ph Ph Ph
O
Ph Ph
2 NaOH
2h
+
+
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
7
8
9
major product
Scheme 1. Comparison of acetophenone self-aldol in solution versus mechanochemistry.
1,5-Diketones have been used as synthetic intermediates for heterocyclic and polyfunctional
compounds which can be useful in coordination chemistry, molecular sensing, catalysis and redox
active self-assembly devices [20]. For example, Smith et al. has used 1,5-diketone chemistry for the
formation of 2,4,6-triarylpyridines [21]. These precursors are used for supramolecular synthesis for
polymers, as well as, in new therapeutic drugs. Some difficulty has been observed with the Michael
addition of α,β-unsaturated aryl ketones because of the steric hindrance on both substrates and strong
bases are often used with low yield formation. Alternative methods have been explored including
metal catalysis [22], enamine catalysis [23], and promotion by barium hydride or barium alkoxides [24].
Therefore, mechanochemistry provides a simple method to gain access to these 1,5-diketones. Given the
propensity of enolates to form aldol condensations products very rapidly under milling conditions,
we conducted all subsequent enolate addition reactions in one-step instead of the two-step process
traditionally executed in solution.
With a clearer understanding of the reactivity trends of enolates under mechanochemical
conditions, we sought to determine exactly how it affects the productivity of enolate addition reactions.
In order to address these questions, a range of enolate reactions was conducted using primary,
secondary, and tertiary enolates with primary, secondary, and tertiary alkyl bromides. Potassium
tert-butoxide was used as the base from the results of the previous study. Furthermore, since these
reactions need to be conducted in a one-step fashion, the bulky nature of the t-butyl group was
expected to decrease the competitive nucleophilic addition reaction by the base. The results of this
study are given in Figure 1.
From the given results, it is clear that various competitive reactions are highly influential in
the formation of the enolate addition product. When comparing ketone reagents on solid support,
Muzart demonstrated the aldol condensation reactivity is highest for acetophenone as compared
to more sterically hindered ketones [25]. In addition to the aldol condensation, the base can also
act as a nucleophile which leads to additional side products in many of these reactions. We believe
strategic control over the steric bulk of the ketone and alkyl halide is key to controlling the yield
of mono addition products. In the case of isobutyrophenone (1c), which forms a tertiary enolate
(entries 3ca–3cc), the presence of the two methyl groups prevents the elimination step needed to form
the α,β-unsaturated ketone such that it leads to the highest yield of mono addition product [26].
Additionally, sterically hindered reactions are difficult to conduct under conventional
solution-based conditions and often require the use of activated enolates such as enol acetates,
enamines, 1,3-dicarbonyls, or silyl enol-ethers. For instance, McGlacken et al. achieved a 15% product
yield from the reaction of propiophenone with benzyl bromide through the activation with a chiral

Molecules 2017, 22, 696
4 of 7
imine [27]. Similarly, Maruoka et al. recovered a 73% yield with the activated silyl enol-ether of
isobutryophenone and chlorodiphenylmethane through the use of a methylalumoxane catalyst [28].
In this case, both trimethylsilane and the aluminum catalysts were used for the activation of the
ketone reagent. To demonstrate the ability to generate sterically crowded molecules via these unique
conditions, we were able to synthesize 1,3,3,3-tetraphenyl-2,2-dimethyl-1-propanone (3cc) in a 39%
yield, a molecule we were unable to observe under solution-based conditions.
Figure 1. Enolate reactivity results.
Our previous results suggest competing reactions with primary enolates may ultimately lead
to low mono addition product formation. In order to alleviate this problem, the trimethylsilyl-enol
ether of acetophenone was generated to determine if these enolate equivalents would perform better
under mechanochemical conditions. We milled the silyl enol ether of acetophenone in the presence of
cesium fluoride with benzyl bromide, bromodiphenylmethane, and triphenylbromide to compare the
reactivity to our earlier experiments. The results of this latter study are given in Figure 2.

Molecules 2017, 22, 696
5 of 7
As was expected, the trap has enabled a greater selectivity for single-addition products confirming
an increase in control of the reactivity. Although no aldol condensation products were observed,
the overall yields of the enolate addition products decreased significantly.
Figure 2. Silyl enol ether reactivity under mechanochemical conditions.
3. Materials and Methods
General: Mechanochemical milling reactions were carried out in a SPEX 8000D Miller/Mill
(Spex Certiprep, Metuchen, NJ, USA) at a frequency of 18 Hz using a custom made stainless
steel vial with a single stainless steel ball bearing. 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
spectra were obtained using a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA),
13C-NMR spectra were recorded at 100 MHz and all chemical shift values are reported in
ppm on the
δ scale. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) data was obtained using
a Hewlett-Packard 6890 series GC–MS system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with an HP-5MS,
30 m × 0.25 µm × 0.25 µm column (Agilent). High resolution mass spectral determinations were
carried out by using a Micromass Q-TOF-2 Mass Spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) in
positive mode. Analytical Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) was performed on silica gel plates
using UV light. Flash column chromatography was performed on a CombiFlash Automated Flash
Chromatography system (Teledyne Isco, Lincoln, NE, USA) by using RediSep Rf Gold high
performance flash columns (fine spherical silica gel 20–40 µm) (Teledyne Isco). Deuterated chloroform
was obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc. (Andover, MA, USA) and used without
further purification. All reagents were purchased from Acros Organics and used without further
purification. Custom-made vials were made by the machine shop at the University of Cincinnati with
metal rods purchased from McMaster-Carr (Aurora, OH, USA). Simriz 486 Perfluoroelastomer O-rings
(6/16” ID × 7/16” OD × 3/32” width) were purchased from Small Parts Inc. (Logansport, IN, USA).
NMR Spectra can be found in Supplementary Materials.
General Enolate Reaction Procedure
Two millimole ketone, alkyl bromide, and potassium tert-butoxide (1:1:1) were added to
a custom-made stainless steel vial with a 3/16” stainless steel ball. The stainless steel vial was sealed
with the use of a Teflon O-ring and tightened with a vice. Reactions were run for 3 h in a Spex

Molecules 2017, 22, 696
6 of 7
8000D Mixer/Mill. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate and
dried onto silica under reduced pressure for flash chromatography separation. Product isolation was
achieved with a gradient ramp from 100% heptane to 10% ethyl acetate.
4. Conclusions
Enolate reactivity under solvent-free mechanochemistry conditions is quite different from that for
solution-based conditions. We have observed that it is best to conduct these reactions in a one-step
manner rather than two separate steps as traditionally conducted in solution. This is necessary in order
to avoid the competitive aldol condensation reaction. The use of a bulky base limits the competitive
reaction of the base reacting with the electrophile. Although there are some limitations with conducting
enolate reactions under solvent-free conditions, these conditions are beneficial for tertiary enolates, and the
formation of sterically hindered products such as 1,3,3,3-tetraphenyl-2,2-dimethyl-1-propanone (3cc).
Ball milling can be an excellent asset for the reduction of solvent waste and the generation of more
environmentally benign reactions. However, in order to achieve these goals, we must first understand
the nuances of this process.
Supplementary Materials: Supplementary materials are available online.
Acknowledgments: We would like to acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation (CHE-1465110).
We are also grateful to Ronald Hudepohl of the University of Cincinnati’s machine shop for his kind instruction
and insights.
Author Contributions: H.H. and J.M. conceived and designed the experiments; H.H. performed the experiments;
H.H. and J.M. analyzed the data; J.M. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; J.M. wrote the paper.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design
of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the
decision to publish the results.
References and Notes
1.
Almas¸i, D.; Alonso, D.A.; Balaguer, A.-N.; Nájera, C. Water versus solvent-free conditions for the
enantioselective inter- and intramolecular aldol reaction employing L-prolinamides and L-prolinethioamides
as organocatalysts. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1123–1131. [CrossRef]
2.
3.
4.
5.
Crawford, D.E.; Miskimmin, C.K.G.; Albadarin, A.B.; Walker, G.; James, S.L. Organic synthesis by twin screw
extrusion (TSE): Continuous, scalable and solvent-free. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1507–1518. [CrossRef]
Gérard, E.M.C.; Sahin, H.; Encinas, A.; Bräse, S. Systematic study of a solvent-free mechanochemically
induced domino oxa-michael-aldol reaction in a ball mill. Synlett 2008, 17, 2702–2704.
Kumar, S. An improved one-pot and eco-friendly synthesis of aurones under solvent-free conditions.
Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2014, 7, 95–99. [CrossRef]
Machuca, E.; Juaristi, E. Organocatalytic activity of α,α-dipeptide derivatives of (S)-proline in the asymmetric
aldol reaction in absence of solvent. Evidence for non-covalent π-π interactions in the transition state.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 1144–1148. [CrossRef]
6.
7.
8.
Rodríguez, B.; Bruckmann, A.; Bolm, C. A highly efficient asymmetric organocatalytic aldol reaction in a ball
mill. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 4710–4722. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rappe, C.; Sachs, W.H. Enolization of ketones. Iv. Rate and orientation of base-catalyzed deuteration of
some methyl ketones. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 4127–4128. [CrossRef]
Ellis, T.K.; Martin, C.H.; Tsai, G.M.; Ueki, H.; Soloshonok, V.A. Efficient synthesis of sterically constrained
symmetrically α,α-disubstituted α-amino acids under operationally convenient conditions. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 6208–6214. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.
House, H.O.; Prabhu, A.V.; Phillips, W.V. Chemistry of carbanions. XXVIII. Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic
resonance spectra of metal enolates. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 1209–1214. [CrossRef]
10. Jackman, L.M.; Lange, B.C. Methylation of lithioisobutyrophenone in weakly polar aprotic solvents.
The effect of aggregation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4494–4499. [CrossRef]

Molecules 2017, 22, 696
7 of 7
11. Damoun, S.; Van de Woude, G.; Choho, K.; Geerlings, P. Influence of alkylating reagent softness on the
regioselectivity in enolate ion alkylation: A theoretical local hard and soft acids and bases study. J. Phys.
Chem. A 1999, 103, 7861–7866. [CrossRef]
12. Toda, F.; Tanaka, K.; Hamai, K. Aldol condensations in the absence of solvent: Acceleration of the reaction
and enhancement of the stereoselectivity. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 3207–3209. [CrossRef]
13. Jörres, M.; Aceña, J.L.; Soloshonok, V.A.; Bolm, C. Asymmetric carbon-carbon bond formation under
solventless conditions in ball mills. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 1265–1269. [CrossRef]
14. Waddell, D.; Thiel, I.; Clark, T.; Marcum, S.; Mack, J. Making kinetic and thermodynamic enolates via
solvent-free high speed ball milling. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 209–211. [CrossRef]
15. Díez-Barra, E.; de la Hoz, A.; Loupy, A.; Martínez-González, A.; Martínez-Merino, V.; Merino, S.; Paugam, R.;
Sánchez-Verdú, P.; Sansoulet, J.; Torres, J. Unexpected double benzylation of acetophenone under phase
transfer catalysis conditions. Acidity or π−π interaction effect? Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 3659–3668. [CrossRef]
16. McKissic, K.S.; Caruso, J.T.; Blair, R.G.; Mack, J. Comparison of shaking versus baking: Further understanding
the energetics of a mechanochemical reaction. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 1628–1632. [CrossRef]
17. Although we have observed the various aldol self-condensation products under milling conditions, we were
unable to isolate and purify these products through various separation methods, therefore we were unable
to provide isolated yields. Characterization of these compounds were done through GC-MS and comparison
to literature values.
18. Koester, R.; Pourzal, A.-A. Condensation products from alkyl phenyl ketones. Synthesis 1973, 674–676.
19. Wayne, W.; Adkins, H. The condensation of ketones by aluminum t-butoxide to compounds of the mesityl
oxide type. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62, 3401–3404. [CrossRef]
20. Liu, W.-Y.; Xu, Q.-H.; Liang, Y.-M.; Chen, B.-H.; Liu, W.-M.; Ma, Y.-X. Preparation of 1,5-diketone derivatives
containing ferrocenyl by michael reaction under solvent-free condition. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 637–639,
719–722. [CrossRef]
21. Smith, N.M.; Raston, C.L.; Smith, C.B.; Sobolev, A.N. PEG mediated synthesis of amino-functionalised
2,4,6-triarylpyridines. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 1185–1190. [CrossRef]
22. Shankar, R.; Jha, A.K.; Singh, U.S.; Hajela, K. An efficient and improved synthesis of 1,5-diketones: Versatile
conjugate addition of nucleophiles to
3077–3079. [CrossRef]
α,β-unsaturated enones and alkynones. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
23. Liu, B.; Wang, J.; Pang, Y.; Ge, Z.; Li, R. Unexpected synthesis of 1,3,5-triarly-1,5-diketones from aryl ketones
via di-enamine mechanism. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 9240–9244. [CrossRef]
24. Takahashi, H.; Arai, T.; Yanagisawa, A. 1,5-diketone synthesis promoted by barium hydride or barium
alkoxides. Synlett 2006, 2006, 2833–2835. [CrossRef]
25. Muzart, J. Self-condensation of ketones catalyzed by basic aluminum oxide. Synthesis 2002, 1982, 60–61.
[CrossRef]
26. An excellent suggestion made by a reviewer of this manuscript was to include the amount of self-condensation
products formed in each reaction. However, given the various self-aldol products generated, 1,5 diketone
(product 7) in addition to several additional 1,2 addition products (products 8 and 9) and the inability to
isolate and full characterize these products, we cannot determine the actual yields of self-condensation.
27. Clarke, S.L.; McSweeney, C.M.; McGlacken, G.P. Investigation of a novel diamine based chiral auxiliary in
the asymmetric alkylation of ketones. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2014, 25, 356–361. [CrossRef]
28. Hanawa, H.; Abe, N.; Maruoka, K. Double coordination and activation ability of methylalumoxane (MAO)
for hetero functionality: Pivotal role as polymerization cocatalyst. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 5365–5368.
[CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Not available.
©
2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).