220 Pitucha et al.
After cooling, the solution was neutralized with 3
M HCl. The solid formed was filtered, dried, and
crystallized from ethanol. Yield: 68%, mp 210–
stability of intensities was monitored by measure-
ments of three standards every 100 reflections. Crys-
tal structure was solved by direct methods using
SHELXS97 [25] and refined by the full-matrix least
squares on F2 using the SHELXL97 [26]. All non-
hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic dis-
placement parameters. The hydrogen atom bonded
to N4 was located from a difference Fourier map and
was refined isotropically. The remaining hydrogen
atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to
ride on their parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq
(C, N).
1
211◦C. H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 1.19 (t, 3H, J = 7.0,
CH3), 3.60 (q, 2H, J = 5.0,CH2), 6.74 (s, 2H, NH2),
7.11–7.55 (m, 5H, CHarom), 10.48 (s, 1H, 1H NH),
11.02 (t, 1H, J = 5.0, NH) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-
d6) δ: 12.36 (CH3), 84.90 (CH2), 85.95 (C C), 123.51,
124.82, 126.66, 127.32 (CHarom), 130.08 (Carom),
131.91(CN), 152.74 (C O), 160.58 (C S), 173.02
(C NH2) ppm. IR (KBr) ν: 3479, 3311, 3153 (NH),
2122 (CN), 1647 (C O), 1153 (C S) cm−1. MS (EI)
m/z (%): 262 (40) [M+], 175 (100).
Supplementary Material
Synthesis of N-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-amino-5-
oxo-4-phenyl-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole-1-
carbothioamide 3b
The CCDC-719663 for 3a contains the supple-
mentary crystallographic data for this paper.
The data can be obtained free of charge at
the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
(CCDC), 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK;
fax: +44(0) 1223 336 033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam
.ac.uk].
The thiosemicarbazide derivative 2b (10 mmol) was
dissolved in 3 N HCl (15 mL) and refluxed for 2 h.
After cooling, the formed precipitate was filtered
off and then crystallized from ethanol. Yield: 70%,
1
mp 217–218◦C. H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 2.51 (s, 3H,
CH3), 6.80 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.95–7.70 (m, 9H, CHarom),
10.55 (s, 1H, NH), 11.42 (t, 1H, J = 6.0, NH) ppm.
13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 14.86 (CH3), 91.40 (C4),
91.40 (C C), 118.41, 129.05, 130.65 (CHarom), 153.72
(Carom), 156.42 (C O), 163.44 (C S), 168.57 (C NH2)
ppm. IR (KBr) ν: 3485, 3321, 3149 (NH), 1653 (C O),
1151 (C S) cm−1. MS (EI) m/z (%): 337 (25) [M+],
175 (100).
Antimicrobial Screening
Fresh bacterial suspensions with an optical density
of 0.5 McFarland standard [150 × 106 CFU (colony
forming units)/mL], were prepared in sterile saline
(0.85% NaCl) and then were diluted 1:100 in the
Mueller–Hinton broth. All stock solutions of the as-
sayed compounds were prepared in dimethyl sulfox-
ide (DMSO) mixed with distilled water (1:1). It was
found that DMSO at the final concentration in the
medium had no influence on growth of the tested mi-
croorganisms. Ampicillin, cefuroxim, and gentam-
icin at the 0.0075–500 mg L−1 concentration were
used as control antibacterial agents. The agar dilu-
tion procedure was performed using the Mueller–
Hinton agar as the base medium to which serial di-
lutions of the tested compounds at concentrations
from 1.96 to 1000 mg L−1 were added. The plates
were poured on the day of testing. 10 μL of each bac-
terial suspension was put onto the Mueller-Hinton
agar, containing the tested compounds; medium
without the compounds was used as a control. The
plates were incubated at 37◦C for 18 h. The MIC
was defined as the lowest concentration of the tested
compounds that completely inhibited visible growth
of bacteria. Antibacterial activity of the compounds
was also determined spectrophotometrically by mi-
crodilution method with the Mueller–Hinton broth,
containing from 0.49 to 1000 mg L−1 of the tested
compounds. Two-fold dilutions of the tested com-
pounds in the medium in the wells of the microdi-
lution plates were prepared, and then each well
Synthesis of N-Cyclohexyl-3-amino-5-oxo-4-phe-
nyl-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole-1-carbothioamide
3c.
Cyanophenyl acetic acid hydrazide 1 1.7 g (10 mmol)
and cyclohexyl isothiocyanate (10 mmol) in 10 mL
of anhydrous diethyl ether was kept at room tem-
perature for 24 h. Then the formed compound was
filtered off, washed with diethyl ether, and crystal-
1
lized from ethanol. Yield: 65%, mp 223–225◦C. H
NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 1.03–1.79 (m, 10H, 5×CH2),
4.07 (s, 1H, CH), 5.91 (s, 2H, NH2), 76.99–7.61 (m,
5H, CHarom), 9.06 (s, 1H, NH), 9.16 (s, 1H, NH) ppm.
13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 23.22, 23.74, 30.77, 31.02
(5×CH2), 51.03 (CH), 75.38 (C4), 121.83, 122.33,
123.82, 126.67, 127.53 (CHarom), 132.35(Carom),
153.53 (C O), 166.80 (C S), 78.83 (C–NH2) ppm. IR
(KBr) ν: 3484, 3239, 2927 (NH), 1644 (C O), 1177
(C S) cm−1. MS (EI) m/z (%): 314 (5), 175 (100).
Crystallographic Measurement
Single-crystal diffraction data were measured at
room temperature in the ω/2θ mode on the
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer using
the graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation. The
Heteroatom Chemistry DOI 10.1002/hc