R. Borthakur et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 46 (2014) 198–201
199
N
N
N
Cu
N
Cu
H
2
O
OH
2
OH2
C
O
R
R
C
O
O
O
OH
2
OH
2
Zn
NO3
NO3
H O
2
OH
2
OH2
2 4 3 2 2 8 2 4 4 4
Fig. 1. The structure of [ZnCu (H ) (H O) ]·2H O (H
Ln)(NO Ln = H L1(1), H L2(2)). (R = 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde and Br, respectively).
The detail of preparation and characterization of catalysts [12]
different solvents for the oxidation of 1a using catalyst 1 under the re-
flux condition and also under the solvent free condition. Results are
n
n
1
2
[
ZnCu
2 3 2 2 8 2 4 4 4
(L )(NO ) (H O) ]·2H O where (H L = H L (1), H L (2))
has been reported in our earlier publication [8].
3
summarized in (Fig. 2). Except for CH CN all other solvents gave very
The catalytic efficiency of the synthesized trinuclear complexes 1–2
were explored for the oxidation of alcohols to corresponding carbonyl
compounds [13]. Our initial experiments were performed on benzyl
low yields of 2a. The oxidation of 1a under the solvent free condition
gave the best yield of 2a.
2 2
Thus, our optimized reaction conditions are 1a (5 mmol), H O and
alcohol with H
2
O
2
using complex 1 in acetonitrile under reflux to find
8 mol% of catalyst under a solvent free condition. The oxidation of other
primary, secondary, allylic and aliphatic alcohols were then examined
using the optimized protocol. Complex 2 was also found to catalyze
the oxidation of alcohols to corresponding carbonyl compounds under
the solvent free condition in 60–82%. Catalyst 1 showed better results
than catalyst 2. This may be due to the fact that the catalytic activity of
complexes varies with the size of the substituent. It was observed that
the activity decreases with an increase in the bulkiness of the substitu-
ent. This may be due to the steric hindrance caused by the substituent,
which can affect the planarity of the ligand in the complexes and
hence the approach of the incoming substrate to the center. The results
for the oxidation of a variety of alcohols are summarized in Table 2. All
the reactions occurred in open atmosphere with complete selectivity
for ketones or aldehydes and no other product was detected in the reac-
tion mixture. So, it is clear that air is not a significant co-oxidant in the
oxidation process and copper (II) complexes are air stable.
It is also important to verify the viability of reusing catalytic system
for different substrates. The basic advantage of heterogeneous catalyst is
their reuse for consecutive catalytic cycles. To evaluate the catalyst reus-
ability, it was recovered by filtration, washed with DCM and dried in the
oven for 30 min. Catalyst was reused under the optimized condition
with benzyl alcohol to give the corresponding benzaldehyde; the data
obtained are shown in (Fig. 3).
the best reaction conditions. The results are shown in (Table 1).
It was found that high conversion and good yield of oxidation prod-
uct were obtained by employing 8 mol% of catalyst 1 (Table 1, entry 3).
The synthetic transformation did not proceed in the absence of catalyst
(
entry 6). This observation revealed the catalytic role of the complex. It
was observed that the oxidation of benzyl alcohol to the corresponding
benzaldehyde did not proceed at all when the monometallic copper [14]
and zinc [15] complexes were used as catalyst (entries 7–10). This result
showed that two metal centers are better than one metal center and
work in better harmony with one another, thus exhibiting cooperative
effect of one another. Encouraged by these results, we screened
8
1
mol % catalyst,
o
00 C, H O
2
2
Solvent free
R
R
HO
O
2a-l
1a-l
Scheme 1. Oxidation of alcohol using catalyst.
In conclusion, we have developed an efficient heterogeneous cata-
lytic system based on Cu(II)–Zn(II), showing cooperative effect for the
oxidation of benzylic, allylic and aliphatic alcohols to the corresponding
carbonyl compounds using hydrogen peroxide as an oxidant under sol-
vent free condition. Furthermore, the catalyst can be recovered and
Table 1
Amount of catalyst variation of 1 for oxidation of benzyl alcohol.
9
8
7
6
50
40
30
0
0
0
0
Yield (%)
Time in hrs
Entry
Catalyst 1 (in mol%)
Time (h)
Yield (%)a
b
1
2%
5%
8%
10%
15%
–
36
16
12
16
20
24
24
24
24
24
15
35
40
30
25
–
c
2
d
3
e
4
2
0
0
0
f
5
1
g
6
h
7
5%
5%
8%
8%
–
i
8
–
h
9
–
1
0i
–
a Isolated yields.
b
c
d
e
b Reaction conditions: substrate (5 mmol), catalyst (2 mol% , 5 mol% , 8 mol% , 10 mol% ,
f
g
h
i
1
8
5 mol% , no catalyst , [Cu(H
0 °C (oil bath temperature).
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
L)(H O)] and [Zn(H L)(H O) ] ), H O , CH CN (3 mL),
Fig. 2. Optimization of solvent effect.