Angewandte Chemie International Edition
10.1002/anie.201801372
COMMUNICATION
an oxygen centered formyloxyl radical, HC(O)O•. From the results Acknowledgements
4
–
40
in Tables 1 and 2, this reaction is catalyzed by [Co(IV)W12O ]
but also occurs to some degree in its absence. By calculations it
has been shown that the formyloxyl radical is decarboxylated
This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation
grant # 763/14 and the Israel Ministry of Science and Technology.
R.N. is the Rebecca and Israel Sieff Professor of Organic
Chemistry.
[
20]
more slowly than the analogous acetyloxyl radical. Thus, the
formyloxyl radical has a sufficient lifetime in the presence of
arenes to react to form a cyclohexadienyl formate radical
intermediate species followed by formation of aryl formates. The
radical nature of this reaction is supported by trapping of the
formyloxy radical and is also supported by the KIE observed for
the oxidation of benzene, the product ratio formed in the
competitive oxidation of PhCl:PhH, and the product distribution
observed in the oxidation of halo-benzenes.
Keywords: Polyoxometalate • Electrocatalysis • Anodic
oxidation • C-H bond activation • Formic acid
[
[
1]
2]
a) M. Ricci, D. Bianchi, R. Bortolo, R. in Sustainable Industrial Processes,
Eds.: F. Cavani, G. Centi, S. Perathoner, F. Trifiró), Wiley-VCH,
(
Weinheim, 2009, pp. 507-528; b) M. K. Al Mesfer, M. Danisha, S. M.
Ahmed, Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2016, 89, 1869-1878; c) S. Fukuzumi, K.
Ohkubo, Asian J. Org. Chem. 2015, 4, 836-845; d) T. Jiang, W. Wang,
B. Han, New J. Chem. 2013, 37, 1654-1664.
An additional advantage of this reaction system is that aryl
[
21]
formates are very sensitive to hydrolysis. Thus, after extraction
of the aryl formates from the reaction solution they were treated
a) T. Tsuji, A. A.; Zaoputra, Y. Hitomi, K. Mieda, T. Ogura, Y. Shiota, K.
Yoshizawa, H. Sato, M. Kodera, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7779-
4
with 0.5 mol % 60 HClO ; the corresponding phenol derivatives
were formed within 10 min at room temperature at quantitative
conversions. Therefore, it is easy to form phenol and its
derivatives by mild acid catalysis from the initially formed esters
and in essence to recover the formic acid that was reacted leading
in sum to the following electrochemical transformation where
formic acid is a sacrificial but recoverable reagent:
7
1
7
782; b) K. Hirose, K. Ohkubo, S. Fukuzumi, Chem. – Eur. J. 2016, 22,
2904-12909; c) M. Yamada, K. D. Karlin, S. Fukuzumi, Chem. Sci. 2016,
, 2856-2863; d) Y. Morimoto, S. Bunno, N. Fujieda, H. Sugimoto, S. Itoh,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5867-5870; e) M. Tani, T. Sakamoto, S.
Mita, S. Sakaguchi, Y. Ishii, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2586–2588.
S. S. Acharyya, S. Ghosh, R. Tiwari, C. Pendem, T. Sasaki, R. Bal, ACS
Catal. 2015, 5, 2850-2858.
[3]
4]
ArH + H
2 2
O ® ArOH + H
[
a) A. S. Larsen, K. Wang, M. A. Lockwood, G. L. Rice, T. Won, S. Lovell,
M. Sadilek, F. Turecek, J. M. Mayer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
10112−10123; b) T. Kojima, K. Nakayama, K. Ikemura, T. Ogura, S.
Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11692−11700; c) J. R. Bryant,
T. Matsuo, J. M. Mayer, Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 1587−1592; d) P.
Afanasiev, A. B. Sorokin, Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 583-593.
For recent some reviews on electrorganic transformations. E. J. Horn, B.
a) R. Rosen, P. S. Baran, ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 302−308; b) M. Yan,
Y. Kawamata, P. S. Baran, Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 13230–13319; c) R.
Francke, R. D. Little, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 2492–2521; d) J.-I. Yoshida,
K. Kataoka, R. Horcajada, A. Nagaki, Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2265–
Although the electronic structure of the putative formyloxyl radical
[
22]
has been investigated computationally, and its formation from
[
23]
formic acid on Pt(111) has also been studied computationally,
as far we could determine this is the first example that explicitly
indicates the in situ formation of a formyloxy radical from formic
acid in an oxidative electrochemical transformation and further its
reactivity - in this case the C-H bond activation of arenes to yield
[5]
a
formate ester. The new electrochemical transformation
described herein may provide new opportunities for the
sustainable preparation of phenol and some of its derivatives in
order to move away from the complicated cumene hydroperoxide
process that has a low per pass conversion of cumene and
2
299; J. B. Sperry, D. L. Wright, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 605–621.
[
[
6]
7]
a) L. Eberson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 4669-4677; b) Y. Kawamata,
M. Yan, Z. Liu, D. H. Bao, J. Chen, J. T. Starr, P. S. Baran, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2017, 139, 7448-7451; c) Q. L. Yang, Y. Q. Li, C. Ma, P. Fang, X.
J. Zhang, T. S. Mei, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3293−3298; d) A. K.
Vannucci, Z. Chen, J. J. Concepcion, T. J. Meyer, ACS Catal. 2012, 2,
[
24]
produces acetone as co-product.
7
16-719.
T. Morofuji, A. Shimizu, J. Yoshida, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51,
259-7262.
Experimental Section
7
[
[
8]
9]
B. Lee, H. Naito, T. Hibino, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 440–444.
I. YamanakaT. Onizawa, S. Takenaka, K. Otsuka, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
The electrocatalytic experiments were performed in a thermostated
2
microcell at 25 °C with platinum gauze anode working electrode (3 cm
2
003, 42, 3653-3655.
effective area), a platinum wire cathode counter electrode and Pt or quasi
[
[
10] a) B. B. Sarma, R. Carmieli, A. Collauto, I. Efremenko, J. M. L. Martin, R.
Neumann, ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 6403−6407; b) A. B. Ene, T. Archipov, E.
Roduner, J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 3688−3694.
+
Ag reference electrode. In a typical reaction, a magnetically stirred
III
solution of substrate and K
5
Co W12
O
40 (10 µmol) in 3 mL of solvent was
electrolyzed at constant potential (1.8 V vs Pt) until a known amount of
charge was passed. To the reaction was added water and the reaction
mixture was extracted with ethyl ether, and the collected organic extracts
11] a) G. I. Panov, G. I. CATTECH 2000, 4, 18−31; b) W. F. Hoelderich, Catal.
Today 2000, 62, 115−130; c) F. Kollmer, H. Hausmann, W. F. Holderich,
J. Catal. 2004, 227, 398−407; d) H. Xin, A. Koekkoek, Q. Yang, R. A. van
Santen, C. Li, E. J. M. Hensen, Chem. Commun. 2009, 7590−7592; e)
B. E. R. Snyder, S. P. Vanelderen, M. L. Bols, S. D. Hallaert, L. H. Böttger,
L. Ungur, K. Pierloot, R. A. Schoonheydt, B. F. Sels, E. I. Solomon,
Nature, 2016, 536, 317-321.
were washed with aqueous NaHCO
3
then with water and finally dried with
anhydrous Na SO . The conversion/yield of products and selectivity were
2
4
determined by GC-TCD, GC-FID, and GC-MSD. EPR spectra were
recorded on a Bruker ELEXSYS 500 X-band spectrometer equipped with
a Bruker ER4102ST resonator at room temperatureꢀwith microwave power
of 20 mW, 0.1 mT modulation amplitude and 100 kHz modulation
frequency. A 0.1 M (20 mg) BMPO and 0.3 M (23 mg) LiOOCH solution in
[
[
[
12] L. Eberson J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 3192-3199.
13] P. Carloni, L. Eberson, Acta Chem. Scand. 1991, 45, 373-376.
14] L. C. W. Baker, T. P. McCutcheon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 4503-
1
mL formic acid was electrolyzed for 30 minutes at 1.8 V vs SHE under
4
506.
15] A. M. Khenkin, L. Weiner, Y. Wang, R. Neumann, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
001, 123, 8531-8542.
the typical reaction conditions. The solution was immediately transferred
to an EPR capillary tube and immediately analyzed.
[
2
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.