4828 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 61, No. 14, 1996
Notes
Ta ble 2. Rela tive Ra tes, Ha m m ett Cor r ela tion s, a n d
Secon d a r y r-Deu ter iu m Kin etic Isotop e Effect for th e
Cya n id e Abstr a ction s fr om Ben zyl Isocya n id es by
Tr i-n -bu tyltin Ra d ica l a t 80 °C
ing carbanions which experience dispersion of the nega-
tive charge into nitro group. However, such delocalization
could not occur and the charge localizes instead on the
carbon atom for the corresponding TS. The fractional
benzylic anion moiety of TS 3 could behave similarly so
that the negative charge may not conjugate with the
phenyl ring. The validity of F-σ correlation in Table 1
could be thus soley derived from the inductive effects
caused by the substituents (Y). On the other hand, the
structure of cationic portion of 3 could be equivalent to a
resonance hybrid of A, B, and C. In particular, C could
significantly reduce the free energy of activation for 3.
Y
relative
rates
p-OCH3
p-CH3
H
1
p-Cl
p-CN
a
kY/kH
0.63
0.80
2.04
3.12
F ) 0.77b (r ) 0.979);c kH/kD ) 1.112
d
a
Error limits are less than 3% with average deviations of more
b
than three runs. The values of σ were taken from Ritchie, C. D.;
Sager, W. F. Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1964, 2, 334. c Correlation
coefficient. kH/kD ) kH/kp-CH × kp-CH /kD ) 0.89/0.80 ) 1.112.
d
3
3
nides quantitatively (over 98%) accounts for the produc-
tion of corresponding toluenes. Application of steady
state approximation to the radical concentrations for
YC6H4CH2• and C6H5CH2• could lead to eq 12. The
The cyanide abstractions by tri-n-butyltin radical show
a relatively large Hammett constant (F ) 0.77) which
indicate also the similar polarization to that of 3, that is
[YC6H4Cδ-H2‚‚‚NdC‚‚‚Snδ+(n-Bu)3], 4. TS 4 could draw
more charge separations than 3. Here again the negative
charge stays on the benzylic carbon atom. The cationic
part of 4 resembles tri-n-butyltin cation. The bond
dissociation energy of n-Bu3Sn-H is 74 kcal.13 The
ionization potential of n-Bu3Sn• could be roughly 143 kcal
which is actually the oxidation potential of Me3Sn•.14 The
bond strength of C6H5-H is 112 kcal15 and ionization
potential of C6H5• is 212 kcal.16,17 Tri-n-butyltin cation,
n-Bu3Sn+, could be thereby 107 kcal below the phenyl
cation, C6H5+, in terms of the heat content. The vigorous
stabilization of tri-n-butyltin cation could provoke decent
NdC‚‚‚Snδ+(n-Bu)3 bond formation for 4, which may be
then translated into the equivalent YC6H4Cδ-H2‚‚‚NdC
bond breaking. Accordingly, 4 could involve more bond
cleavage than 3. This is eminently consistent with the
larger figures of Hammett constant and secondary R-deu-
terium kinetic isotope effect for the tin radical (F ) 0.77;
kY/kH ) [YC6H4CH3]/[C6H5CH3] ×
[C6H5CH2NC]o/[YC6H4CH2NC]o (12)
relative rates (kY/kH) and Hammett correlations have
been accordingly calculated (refer to Table 2). Tri-n-
butyltin radical could react with C6H5CD2NC and
p-CH3C6H4CH2NC with rate constants kD and kCH
respectively. The relative rates (kH/kCH and kD/kCH ) were
,
3
3
3
similarly obtained by the competition method using
p-CH3C6H4CH2NC as the standard. The secondary R-deu-
terium kinetic isotope effect has been thus available from
kH/kD ) kH/kCH × kCH /kD and is shown in Table 2.
3
3
Discu ssion
kH/kD ) 1.112) than for the phenyl radical (F ) 0.24; kYH
kYD ) 1.075).
/
When phenyl radical was derived from thermolysis of
benzoyl peroxide, weakly nucleophilic character had been
disclosed for hydrogen atom abstractions from toluenes
(F ) 0.18)8 and for bromine atom abstractions from benzyl
bromides (F ) 0.13).9 Our F ) 0.24 of Table 1 is thus
consistent with those observations8,9 and suggests the
The structure of polar TS i.e. 3 and 4 must not be a
resonance hybrid of the reactants and the products of eq
1. The polar TS is thereby displaced from the “interme-
diate configuration”. The phenomenon of such displace-
ment has been rationalized as the Perpendicular Effect.18
Due to the Perpendicular Effect,18 the polarity of 3 and
4 may not be adequately correlated with the entities
inherent in the corresponding reactants and products.
The Marcus theory19 also maintains that the intrinsic
barrier is independent of the free energy of reaction.
When a σ bond is located at position â to a phenyl ring
and involved with the atom transfer reactions, the TS
could take a polar structure. The direction of the
polarization could be critically influenced by the character
polar transition state (TS) structure: [YC6H4Cδ-
-
H2‚‚‚NdC‚‚‚C6δ+H5], 3. The small F value could be
associated with modest degree of the polarization. In
case of electrophilic radicals,10,11 the hydrogen abstraction
reactions usually exhibit F+-σ+ Hammett correlations
with F+ < 0. The negative sign of F+ tells that the polarity
of the TS is opposite to that of 3. F+-σ+ relations also
testify to the conjugation of the positive charge on the
benzylic carbon atom with the adjacent phenyl ring.
The deprotonations of nitroalkanes (CH3NO2, MeCH2-
NO2, Me2CHNO2) by the bases12 could yield correspond-
(12) (a) Bordwell, F. G.; Boyle, W. J ., J r.; Yee, K. C. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1970, 92, 5926. (b) Bordwell, F. G.; Boyle, W. J ., J r. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1975, 97, 3447.
(13) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 1st Student ed.; CRC
Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1988.
(14) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Guerra, M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
2854.
(8) Suehiro, T.; Suzuki, A.; Tsuchida, Y.; Yamazaki, J . Bull. Chem.
Soc. J pn. 1977, 50, 3324.
(9) Migita, T.; Nagai, T.; Abe, Y. Chem. Lett. 1975, 543.
(10) Russell, G. A. Free Radicals; Kochi, J . K., Ed.; Wiley: New York,
1973; Vol. 1, Chap. 7.
(11) (a) Kim, S. S.; Sohn, S. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 3703.
(b) Kim, S. S.; Koo, H. M.; Choi, S. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 891.
(c) Kim, S. S.; Choi, S. Y.; Kang, C. H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107,
4234. (d) Kim, S. S.; Seo, J . S.; Yoon, M. H. J . Org. Chem. 1987, 52,
3691. (e) Kim, S. S.; Lee, C. S.; Kim, C. C.; Kim, H. J . J . Phys. Org.
Chem. 1990, 3, 803. (f) Kim, S. S.; Kim, S. Y.; Ryou, S. S.; Lee, C. S.;
Yoo, K. H. J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 192. (g) Kim, S. S.; Kim, H. R.;
Kim, H. B.; Youn, S. J .; Kim, C. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2754.
(15) Davico, G. E.; Bierbaum, V. M.; DePuy, C. H.; Ellison, G. B.;
Squires, R. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2590.
(16) Ades, H. F.; Companion, A. L.; Subbaswamy, K. R. J . Phy.
Chem. 1991, 95, 6502.
(17) Fisher, I. P.; Palmer, T. F.; Lossing, F. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1964, 86, 2741.
(18) Thornton, E. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 2915.
(19) Marcus, R. A. J . Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 891.