The resulting ketoester 15 was converted into the chloroisox-
azolinone 5f in the same way as above and subjected to the
nitrosative cleavage to give the desired chloroalkyne 6f in 54%
overall yield for the last three steps.
This approach to 1-chloroalkynes allies simplicity with the
use of readily available substrates and cheap, ecologically
acceptable, reagents. None of the yields has been optimised and
room for improvement certainly exists; nevertheless, in combi-
nation with the numerous routes to ketoester precurors, it
provides a flexible and rapid route to otherwise inaccessible
acetylenes.
Notes and references
1 J. Boivin, L. Elkaim, P. G. Ferro and S. Z. Zard, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1991, 32, 5321; J. Boivin, S. Huppé and S. Z. Zard, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1995, 36, 5737; J. Boivin, S. Huppé and S. Z. Zard, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1996, 37, 8735.
2 L. ElKaim and S. Z. Zard, unpublished observations.
3 A. S. Kende, P. Fludzinski, J. H. Hill, W. Swenson and J. Clardy, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 3551; E. J. Corey and P. Fuchs, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1972, 3769; J. Villieras, P. Perriot and J. F. Normant, Synthesis,
1975, 458.
Scheme 4 Reagents: (i) lauroyl peroxide (5–20 mol%), 1,2-dichloroethane,
reflux; (ii) lauroyl peroxide (80 mol%), propan-2-ol, reflux; (iii)
NH2OH·HCl, AcONa, MeOH, reflux; (iv) TMSCl, Bu4NBr (Cat.), DMSO,
THF; (iii) NaNO2, FeSO4, AcOH, H2O, 5 °C.
4 J. I. Dickstein and S. I. Miller, in The Chemistry of the Carbon–Carbon
Triple Bond, ed. S. Patai, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1978, ch. 19,
pp. 813–955; V. Jäger, in Methoden Org. Chem. (Houben-Weyl), Georg
Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 1977, Vol. 5/2a; L. Brandsma, Preparative
Acetylenic Chemistry, Elsevier Science, New York, 1992; H. Hopf and
B. Witulski, in Modern Acetylene Chemistry, ed. J. Stang and F.
Diederich, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1995, pp. 48–66.
5 K. Sonogashira, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed. B. M. Trost
and I. Fleming, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991, vol. 3, pp. 521–561.
6 J. B. Carr, H. G. Durham and D. K. Hass, J. Med. Chem. Soc., 1977, 20,
934.
into isoxazolinone 2e with hydroxylamine. Chlorination was
accomplished by a combination of trimethylchlorosilane,
DMSO and a catalytic amount of Bu4NBr. This reagent system,
reported by Fraser and Kong,8 turned out to be superior in
general to sulfuryl chloride for the chlorination of the
isoxazolinones. Finally, nitrosation of 5e furnished the desired
chloroalkyne 6e in 53% yield.
As shown by the sequence in Scheme 4, we were able to
combine this approach to chloroalkynes with a powerful process
for the creation of carbon–carbon bonds based on the radical
chemistry of xanthates.9,10 Thus, addition of xanthate 13
derived from commercially available ethyl 4-chloroacetoacetate
to 10-undecyl pivalate gave the expected adduct 14 in 81%
yield. Reductive removal of the xanthate group was achieved by
portion-wise addition of stoichiometric amounts of lauroyl
peroxide to a refluxing solution of 14 in isopropyl alcohol.11
7 Y. Oikawa, K. Sugano and O. Yonemitsu, J. Org. Chem., 1978, 43,
2083.
8 R. F Fraser and F. Kong, Synth. Commun., 1988, 18, 1071.
9 S. Z. Zard, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 672; B. Quiclet-Sire
and S. Z. Zard, Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon, 1999, 153–154, 137.
10 P. Boutillier and S. Z. Zard, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1304
11 A. Liard, B. Quiclet-Sire and S. Z. Zard, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37,
5877.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 1894–1895
1895
Typeset and printed by Black Bear Press Limited, Cambridge, England