188
M.R. Maurya et al. / Polyhedron 54 (2013) 180–188
Table 9
S1/IC-32/2010). MB acknowledges the Council of Scientific and
Industrial Research (CSIR) for a NET–Junior Research fellowship.
Effect of different catalysts on the oxidation of diphenyl sulfide, conversion, TOF and
product selectivity.
Catalyst (g)
TOF (hꢂ1
)
Conversion (%)
Selectivity (%)a
Appendix A. Supplementary material
dpso
dpsn
[VVO(hap-dahp)]-Y
[VVO(hap-dahp)]-Yb
[VVO(hap-dahp)]-Yc
[VVO(hap-dahp)]
Blank
488
–
–
450
–
81
77
75
75
5
82
80
79
85
90
18
20
21
15
10
CCDC 888645 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://
Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ,
UK; fax: +44 1223 336 033; or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
a
b
c
Abbraviations: dpso = diphenyl sulfoxide, dpsn = diphenyl sulfone.
First cycle of used catalyst.
Second cycle of used catalyst.
References
and the reaction was carried out at room temperature. For
10 mmol (1.86 g,) of diphenyl sulfide, 0.075 g of catalyst and a H2-
O2:diphenyl sulfide molar ratio of 1:1 in 15 mL of acetonitrile, the
reaction was found to give a maximum of 81% conversion of diphe-
nyl sulfide in 7 h of reaction time at room temperature. The selec-
tivity of sulfoxide and sulfone at this conversion is 82% and 18%,
respectively.
[1] D. Rehder, Coord. Chem. Rev. 182 (1999) 297.
[2] M.R. Maurya, Coord. Chem. Rev. 237 (2003) 163.
[3] D. Rehder, J. Inorg. Biochem. 80 (2000) 133.
[4] R.R. Eady, in: H. Sigel, A. Sigel (Eds.), Metal Ions in Biological Systems, vol. 31,
Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995.
[5] A. Butler, in: J. Reedijk, E. Boiwman (Eds.), Bioinorganic Catalysis, second ed.,
Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999 (Chapter 5).
[6] D. Rehder, Bioinorganic Vanadium Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York,
2008. p. 115.
Analysis of the conversion as a function of time, along with the
selectivity of the reaction products (Fig. 9), shows that the initial
selectivity of ca. 92% for the formation of diphenyl sulfoxide at
ca. 25% conversion of diphenyl sulfide in the first hour of the reac-
tion time slowly decreases with the elapse of time. After 7 h it
reaches 82%, with a maximum conversion of 81% in 7 h. No further
conversion or change in the selectivity of the products was noted
after 7 h.
Again, the catalyst shows only partially loss in its catalytic
activity after the recycling process (Table 9). A blank reaction un-
der similar conditions gave only 5% conversion. The neat complex
[VVO(hap-dahp)] (1) also exhibits a very good conversion (75%) of
diphenyl sulfide with a very similar selectivity of the different
products as obtained for the encapsulated complex.
[7] M.R. Maurya, A. Kumar, M. Ebel, D. Rehder, Inorg. Chem. 45 (2006) 5924 (and
references therein).
[8] L. Canali, D.C. Sherrington, Chem. Soc. Rev. 28 (1999) 85.
[9] H. Gröger, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 2795.
[10] P.G. Cozzi, Chem. Soc. Rev. 33 (2004) 410.
[11] M.R. Maurya, J. Costa Pessoa, J. Organomet. Chem. 696 (2011) 244.
[12] P. Adão, J. Costa Pessoa, R.T. Henriques, M.L. Kuznetsov, F. Avecilla, M.R.
Maurya, U. Kumar, I. Correia, Inorg. Chem. 49 (2009) 3542.
[13] M.R. Maurya, A. Kumar, J. Costa Pessoa, Coord. Chem. Rev. 255 (2011) 2315.
[14] K.J. Balkus Jr., A.K. Khanrnamedova, K.M. Dixon, F. Bedioui, Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
143 (1996) 159.
[15] S.P. Verkey, C. Ratnasamy, P. Ratnasamy, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 135 (1998)
295.
[16] C.R. Jacob, S.P. Varkey, P. Ratnasamy, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 22
(1998) 465.
[17] T. Joseph, D. Srinivas, C.S. Gopinath, S.B. Halligudi, Catal. Lett. 83 (2002) 209.
[18] M.R. Maurya, M. Kumar, S.J.J. Titinchi, H.S. Abbo, S. Chand, Catal. Lett. 86 (2003)
97.
[19] J. Poltowicz, K. Pamin, E. Tabor, J. Haber, A. Adamski, Z. Sojka, Appl. Catal. A:
Gen. 299 (2006) 235.
[20] H.M. Alvarez, L.F.B. Malta, M.H. Herbst, A. Horn Jr., O.A.C. Antunes, Appl. Catal.
A: Gen. 326 (2007) 82.
4. Conclusions
The oxidovanadium(V) complex [VVO(hap-dahp)] (1), where
H3hap-dahp is the O3N2 donor Schiff base obtained by the conden-
sation of 2-hydroxyacetophenone and 1-3-diamino-2-hydroxypro-
pane, has been synthesized and its molecular structure determined
by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, confirming its distorted octahe-
dral geometry. Complex 1 has been encapsulated in the super
cages of zeolite Y and used as a catalyst for the oxidation of sty-
rene, methyl phenyl sulfide and diphenyl sulfide with aqueous
H2O2 as an oxidant. A maximum of 82% conversion of styrene
has been achieved under optimized reaction conditions, where
the selectivity of the obtained five reaction products varies in the
order: benzaldehyde (49%) > 1-phenylethane-1,2-diol (25%) > ben-
zoic acid (15%) > styrene oxide (6%) > phenylacetaldehyde (5%).
Under the optimized reaction conditions, a maximum of ca. 98%
conversion of methyl phenyl sulfide, and ca. 81% of diphenyl sul-
fide has been achieved with significant amounts of the correspond-
ing sulfoxide. The neat complex [VVO(hap-dahp)] is also a good
catalyst for these substrates, along with a similar selectivity for
the various products, but with significantly lower turnover fre-
quencies. The encapsulated complex is recyclable at least up to
two cycles of catalytic oxidation, but with a partial loss of activity.
[21] M.R. Maurya, A.K. Chandrakar, S. Chand, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 270 (2007) 225.
[22] M. Salavati-Niasari, M.R. Ganjali, P. Norouzi, J. Porous Mater. 14 (2007) 423.
[23] M.R. Maurya, B. Singh, P. Adão, F. Avecilla, J. Costa Pessoa, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
(2007) 5720.
[24] M.R. Maurya, P. Saini, A. Kumar, J. Costa Pessoa, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2011)
4846.
[25] M.R. Maurya, P. Saini, C. Haldar, F. Avecilla, Polyhedron 31 (2012) 710.
[26] K.L. Smith, L.L. Borer, M.M. Olmstead, Inorg. Chem. 42 (2003) 7410.
[27] R.A. Row, M.M. Jones, Inorg. Synth. 5 (1957) 113.
[28] G.M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97: An Integrated System for Solving and Refining
Crystal Structures from Diffraction Data (Revision 5.1), University of
Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
[29] S. Mukherjee, T. Weyhermüller, E. Bothe, P. Chaudhuri, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
(2003) 1956.
[30] A.P.A. Marques, E.R. Dockal, F.C. Skrobot, I.L.V. Rosa, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 10
(2007) 255.
[31] D. Rehder, C. Weidemann, A. Duch, W. Priebsch, Inorg. Chem. 27 (1988) 584.
[32] D. Rehder, in: P.S. Pregosin (Ed.), Transition Metal Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance, Elsevier, New York, 1991.
[33] A.G.J. Ligtenbarg, R. Hage, B.L. Feringa, Coord. Chem. Rev. 237 (2003) 89.
[34] A. Butler, M.J. Clague, G.E. Meister, Chem. Rev. 94 (1994) 625.
[35] M.R. Maurya, A.A. Khan, A. Azam, S. Ranjan, N. Mondal, A. Kumar, F. Avecilla, J.
Costa Pessoa, Dalton Trans. 39 (2010) 1345.
[36] R. Irie, Y. Ito, T. Katsuki, Synlett (1991) 265.
[37] V. Hulea, E. Dumitriu, Appl. Catal. A 277 (2004) 99.
[38] S.B. Kumar, S.P. Mirajkar, G.C.G. Pais, P. Kumar, R. Kumar, J. Catal. 156 (1995)
163.
[39] M.R. Maurya, M. Bisht, A. Kumar, M.L. Kuznetsov, F. Avecilla, J. Costa Pessoa,
Dalton Trans. 40 (2011) 6968.
[40] L.F. Vilas Boas, J. Costa Pessoa, in: G. Wilkinson, R.D. Gillard, J.A. McCleverty
(Eds.), Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry, Oxford, Pergamon, 1987, pp.
453–583.
[41] M.A. Anderson, A. Willets, S. Allenmark, J. Org. Chem. 62 (1997) 8455.
[42] H.B. ten Brink, H.E. Schoemaker, R. Wever, Eur. J. Biochem. 268 (2001) 132.
Acknowledgements
M.R.M. is thankful to the Department of Science and Technol-
ogy, Government of India, New Delhi for financial assistance (SR/