hydrogen peroxide will lead to a facilitated nucleophilic
attack and heterolytic oxygen transfer. We have now found,
that one can simply carry out oxidation reactions with
hydrogen peroxide in inert and easy to recycle, low boiling
point, perfluorinated alcohols as solvents without the addition
the absolute selectivity to the epoxide product. Other terminal
alkenes such as 1-heptene and 1-decene reacted in a
practically identical manner. As expected the more nucleo-
philic 2-octene was more reactive, and there was no loss of
selectivity. With a yet more nucleophilic and reactive alkene,
2,3-dimethyl-2-butene, reactivity increased significantly;
however, the product epoxide reacted further in acid-
catalyzed type reactions to yield the ring-opened diol and
the rearranged pinocolone (3,3-dimethyl-2-butanone). For
cyclic alkenes, the reactivity was cyclopentene ∼ cyclooctene
> cyclododecene ∼ cyclohexene. Except for cyclohexene
oxide, which proved to be sensitive to further acid-type-
catalyzed reactions, the epoxides were stable under the
reaction conditions. The oxidation of styrene yielded mostly
the carbon-carbon bond cleaved product, benzaldehyde, and
products attributable to acid-catalyzed ring opening of the
epoxide, R-hexafluoropropyloxy-â-hydroxyethylbenzene, and
the rearranged phenylacetaldehyde. Interestingly, meta sub-
stitution with an electron-withdrawing, deactivating nitro
moiety led to selective formation of 3-nitrobenzaldehyde.
Three further observations are worth pointing out. First, the
addition of buffers or basic amines in order to prevent
undesired reactions of acid sensitive compounds led to
deactivation and no reaction. Second, the use of perfluoro-
7
of any metal or nonmetal catalyst. Selective epoxidation of
alkenes and the Baeyer-Villiger oxidation of ketones is
1
17
shown. From the H and O NMR spectra, we deduce that
the strong electron-withdrawing properties of fluorine along
with the hydrogen bonding properties of the O-H hydrogen
atom lead to formation of an electrophilically activated
hydrogen peroxide intermediate, roughly delineated in
Scheme 1. As expected reactivity is increased as a function
Scheme 1
3 3
tert-butyl alcohol, (CF ) COH, as solvent gave virtually the
3 3
of fluorine substitution; CF CHOHCF (1,1,1,3,3,3-hexaflu-
same results in terms of both reactivity and selectivity as
HFIP. Finally, no oxidation products of the perfluorinated
alcohols such as 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoracetone were obtained
under the reaction conditions as measured by GC-MS.9
oroisopropyl alcohol (HFIP) is more active than CF
OH (2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, TFE).
3 2
CH -
First, alkenes were reacted with a slight excess of 30% or
0% H in both TFE and HFIP as solvents. A preliminary
survey of the reactivity of the alkenes is presented in Table
6
2 2
O
The activation of hydrogen peroxide in HFIP was also very
8
1
. Epoxidation of an exemplary difficult to epoxidize
successfully used for the Baeyer-Villiger oxidation of
8
terminal, aliphatic, acyclic alkene, 1-octene, clearly showed
that activity in HFIP was greater than in TFE. Use of non-
fluorine-containing alcohols as solvents such as ethanol and
ketones, Table 2. Thus, cyclic ketones were cleanly con-
verted to lactones in high yield. As is typical for this reaction,
acyclic ketones were much less reactive. Finally, although
2
-propanol showed no activity. Raising the temperature and/
2 2
the oxidation of sulfides to sulfoxides with H O in HFIP
has already been disclosed, it is valuable to state that in
TFE reactions are slower and slightly less selective than those
1
0
or using more concentrated hydrogen peroxide easily in-
creased the conversion. This was possible without comprising
Table 1. Alkene Epoxidation in Perfluorinated Alcoholsa
conversion, mol %, selectivity, mol epoxide/total products
HFIP at 22 °C
TFE at 60 °C
HFIP at 60 °C
substrate
30% H2O2
60% H2O2
30% H2O2
60% H2O2
30% H2O2
60% H2O2
cyclopentene
cyclohexene
cyclooctene
56 (100)
37 (53)c
66 (100)
7 (100)
0
37 (100)
96 (11)d
-
99 (100)
65 (48)e
98 (100)
39 (100)
14 (100)
77 (100)
-
44 (100)
25 (100)
61 (100)
40 (100)
4 (100)
33 (100)
100 (57)f
-
93 (100)
91 (61)g
100 (100)
80 (100)
21 (100)
73 (100)
-
99 (90)f
82 (26)h
99 (100)
85 (100)
30 (100)
74 (100)
-
-
-
-
-
cyclododeceneb
1
2
2
-octene
-octene
,3-diMe-2-butene
59 (100)
97 (100)
-
100l
39k
j
styrene
-nitrostyrene
-
-
-
-
74
13k
3
-
-
a
b
Reaction conditions: 1.2 mmol of substrate, 2 mmol of H2O2, 1 mL of perfluoro alcohol, 20 h. The given mixture of 80:20 cis/trans cyclododecane
c
d
e
gave the same epoxide ratio. 23% 1-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyloxy)-2-hydroxycyclohexane, 24% 1,2-cyclohexanediol. 89% 2,3-dimethyl-2,3-butanediol. 31%
-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyloxy)-2-hydroxycyclohexane, 21% 1,2-cyclohexanediol. 34% 2,3-dimethyl-2,3-butanediol, 9% pinocolone. 39% 1-(1,1,1,3,3,3-
hexafluoroprop-2-yloxy)-2-hydroxycyclohexane. 10% cyclopentanediol. 89% cyclohexanediol. 47% benzaldehyde, 15% phenylacetaldehyde, 32% R-(1,1,1,3,3,3-
hexafluoroprop-2-yloxy)-â-hydroxyethylbenzene, 6% phenol. 100% 3-nitrobenzaldehdye. 53% benzaldehyde, 29% phenylacetaldehyde, 13% R-(1,1,1,3,3,3-
hexafluoroprop-2-yloxy)-â-hydroxyethylbenzene, 9% phenol.
f
g
1
h
i
j
k
l
2862
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 18, 2000