ChemComm
Communication
pyridinic-N (398.3 eV), pyrrolic-N (400.2 eV), graphitic-N (401.1 eV) the carbon catalysis research to exclude the effects of the metal
and nitrogen-oxides (403.3 eV).14,18,19 In order to regulate the impurities in the carbon catalyst.28
nitrogen content, resorcinol (R) was added into the reaction
In conclusion, using MAP as a carbon and nitrogen co-precursor,
system, because R was usually used to synthesize OMC.17,20,21 nitrogen-containing ordered mesoporous carbon has been success-
The N content decreases with the rise of carbonization tempera- fully synthesized via a co-assembly process between MAP and F127.
ture and the molar ratio of R/MAP (Fig. 3D). For example, the N Our results show that this approach is simpler for direct introduc-
content of NOMC-800 changes from 3.3 to 0.9 at% upon tuning tion of nitrogen into the OMC compared with traditional NH3
the weight fraction of R from 0 to 100 wt%. We propose that NH3 post-treatment, step-by-step strategies and other hard-templating
from ammonia water or the hydrolysis of HMT is also partially methods. Furthermore, this work enlarges the application of OMC
involved in the polymerization and/or co-assembly.22 Therefore, in catalysis especially by using OMC as a metal-free catalyst.
there is still some N remaining when only R is used. Nevertheless,
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
the main source of N comes from MAP molecules (Fig. S4, ESI†). Foundation of China (21203214, 21133010, 51221264, and
Alternatively, small XRD patterns (Fig. S5, ESI†), N2 adsorption– 21261160487), MOST (2011CBA00504), the ‘‘Strategic Priority
desorption isotherms (Fig. S6, ESI†), TEM images (Fig. S7 and S9, Research Program’’ of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant
ESI†) and XPS characterization data (Fig. S8 and S10, ESI†) of No. XDA09030103), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foun-
other products given in the ESI† also confirm that we successfully dation (2012M520652). Dr Zhenhua Sun is gratefully acknowl-
synthesized NOMC with a tunable N content.
edged for his stimulating discussions.
NOMC has been used in adsorption, separation, and energy
storage/conversion, but there are few reports of NOMC as a
metal-free catalyst.4,23 It has been demonstrated that N in
N-doped graphene plays a vital role in the C–H activation.24
This progress encouraged us to test the produced NOMC in
selective liquid-phase oxidation of ethylbenzene. The results of
various carbon catalysts are summarized in Table 1. In our
experiment, acetophenone (AcPO) is the main product with
benzaldehyde, benzoic acid and 1-phenyl-ethylalcohol as
the by-products, which is in line with CNTs and/or N-doped
graphene as catalysts.24,25 The blank test indicates that there is a
low reaction activity because of the EB autoxidation.26 CMK-3
exhibits higher catalytic performance than that observed in the
blank test, indicating that the mesoporous carbon material itself
has a certain catalytic ability for the formation of AcPO. However,
O-CMK-3 (CMK-3 treated with HNO3) has a lower activity than
CMK-3, which may be attributed to the side-effects of oxygen-
functional groups introduced via HNO3-treatment.25,27 There is
an obvious increase of catalytic performance when NOMC-800 is
used as a catalyst. We propose that N introduced into the OMC
plays a very important role in the reaction, which is in agreement
with a previous report.24 Moreover, although NOMC prepared
via a similar literature method14 exhibits approximate activity
(see properties of NH3-OMC-800 in Table S2, ESI†), in the view of
the synthesis process, NOMC-800 prepared in this work has an
advantage over the NH3 treatment. It is worth noting that no
metal is induced into the material which is very important for
Notes and references
1 T. Y. Ma, L. Liu and Z. Y. Yuan, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 3977.
2 C. Liang, Z. Li and S. Dai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 3696.
3 J. Lee, J. Kim and T. Hyeon, Adv. Mater., 2006, 18, 2073.
4 W. Z. Shen and W. B. Fan, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 999.
5 Z. Wu, P. A. Webley and D. Y. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 11379.
6 (a) A. H. Lu, A. Kiefer, W. Schmidt and F. Schu¨th, Chem. Mater., 2004,
16, 100; (b) C. M. Yang, C. Weidenthaler, B. Spliethoff, M. Mayanna
and F. Schu¨th, Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 355; (c) A. Vinu, S. Anandan,
C. Anand, P. Srinivasu, K. Ariga and T. Mori, Microporous Mesoporous
Mater., 2008, 109, 398; (d) W. R. Li, D. H. Chen, Z. Li, Y. F. Shi, Y. Wan,
G. Wang, Z. Y. Jiang and D. Y. Zhao, Carbon, 2007, 45, 1757;
(e) A. Vinu, P. Srinivasu, D. P. Sawant, T. Mori, K. Ariga,
J. S. Chang, S. H. Jhung, V. V. Balasubramanian and Y. K. Hwang,
Chem. Mater., 2007, 19, 4367.
7 A. Vinu, K. Ariga, T. Mori, T. Nakanishi, S. Hishita, D. Golberg and
Y. Bando, Adv. Mater., 2005, 17, 1648.
8 D. Liu, J. H. Lei, L. P. Guo and K. J. Deng, Carbon, 2011, 49, 2113.
9 L. Liu, F. Y. Wang, G. S. Shao and Z. Y. Yuan, Carbon, 2010, 48, 2089.
10 Y. Huang, H. Cai, D. Feng, D. Gu, Y. Deng, B. Tu, H. Wang,
P. A. Webley and D. Zhao, Chem. Commun., 2008, 2641.
11 Y. Meng, D. Gu and D. Y. Zhao, Chem. Mater., 2006, 18, 4447.
12 C. F. Xue, B. Tu and D. Y. Zhao, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2008, 18, 3914.
13 M. Florent, C. Xue, D. Zhao and D. Goldfarb, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24, 383.
14 X. Wang, C. G. Liu, D. Neff, P. F. Fulvio, R. T. Mayes, A. Zhamu,
Q. Fang, G. Chen, H. M. Meyer, B. Z. Jang and S. Dai, J. Mater. Chem.
A, 2013, 1, 7920.
15 C. Feng, H. Li and Y. Wan, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2009, 9, 1558.
16 J. Zhao, W. Niu, L. Zhang, H. Cai, M. Han, Y. Yuan, S. Majeed,
S. Anjum and G. Xu, Macromolecules, 2013, 46, 140.
17 D. Liu, J. H. Lei, L. P. Guo, D. Qu, Y. Li and B. L. Su, Carbon, 2012, 50, 476.
18 R. Arrigo, M. Havecker, R. Schlogl and D. S. Su, Chem. Commun.,
2008, 40, 4891.
19 S. Kundu, W. Xia, W. Busser, M. Becker, D. A. Schmidt, M. Havenith
and M. Muhler, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 4351.
20 X. Q. Wang, C. D. Liang and S. Dai, Langmuir, 2008, 24, 7500.
21 A. H. Lu, B. Spliethoff and F. Schuth, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 5314.
22 L. Liu, Q. F. Deng, X. X. Hou and Z. Y. Yuan, J. Mater. Chem., 2012,
22, 15540.
23 K. Kwon, Y. J. Sa, J. Y. Cheon and S. H. Joo, Langmuir, 2012, 28, 991.
24 Y. Gao, G. Hu, J. Zhong, Z. Shi, Y. Zhu, D. S. Su, J. Wang, X. Bao and
D. Ma, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 2109.
25 J. Luo, F. Peng, H. Yu, H. Wang and W. Zheng, ChemCatChem, 2013,
5, 1578.
26 I. Hermans, J. Peeters and P. A. Jacobs, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 3057.
27 H. Yu, F. Peng, J. Tan, X. W. Hu, H. J. Wang, J. Yang and
W. X. Zheng, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 123, 4064.
Table 1 Catalytic activity of different carbon materials for the liquid phase
oxidation of ethylbenzenea
b
Sample
Conversion (%) Selectivity (%) Rs (mmol mÀ2 hÀ1
)
Blank
13.8
40.8
34.9
63.3
14.1
40.2
30.7
84.1
86.1
—
40.8
39.1
168.7
108.1
CMK-3
O-CMK-3c
NOMC-800
NH3-OMC-800 63.1
a
The conversion and selectivity for (AcPO) were determined by GC.
b
c
Yield rate of AcPO per m2 of the catalyst surface at 12 h. CMK-3 is
28 J. Zhang, X. Liu, R. Blume, A. Zhang, R. Schlogl and D. S. Su, Science,
2008, 322, 73.
treated with concentrated HNO3 for 3 h, at 60 1C and denoted as O-CMK-3.
9184 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 9182--9184
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014