Paper
Catalysis Science & Technology
Elemental analysis was performed using a Shimadzu
Acknowledgements
ICPS-7500 inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spec-
troscope (ICP-AES) after the samples were dissolved in dilute
hydrochloric acid (1 : 1).
The morphology of the samples was investigated using a
field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Zeiss
Supra 55 with an accelerating voltage of 20 kV) which was
combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX)
performed using an Oxford Instruments INCA analyzer for
determination of the metal composition.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution
TEM (HRTEM) were carried out using a JEM-2100F electron
microscope (JEOL, Japan) operated at an accelerating voltage
of 200 kV.
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of the samples were
obtained with a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 sorptometer appa-
ratus at −196 °C. All samples were outgassed prior to analysis
at 200 °C before adsorption measurements. The total specific
surface areas were evaluated by the multipoint Brunauer–
Emmett–Teller (BET) method. The mesopore size distribution
and average pore diameter were determined by the Barrett–
Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method applied to adsorption isotherms.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were recorded
using a VG ESCALAB 2201 XL spectrometer with monochro-
matic Al Kα X-ray radiation (1486.6 eV photons). Binding
energies were calibrated based on the graphite C 1s peak at
284.5 eV.
The reduction behavior of calcined samples was studied
by hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR)
using a Micromeritics ChemiSorb 2720 instrument. A 0.1 g
sample, which was placed in a quartz U-tube reactor, was
degassed at 200 °C for 2 h under argon flow (40 mL min−1).
Then TPR was conducted in a stream of 10% (v/v) H2/Ar
(50 mL min−1) with a heating rate of 5 °C min−1 up to 1000
°C. The effluent gas was analyzed by a thermal conductivity
detector (TCD).
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the
973 Program (2011CBA00506), the National Natural Science
Foundation of China, the Program for Changjiang Scholars
and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT1205), and a
project from the Beijing Engineering Center for Hierarchical
Catalysts.
Notes and references
1 R. Alcántara, L. Canoira, P. G. Joao, J. M. Santos and I. Vázquez,
Appl. Catal., A, 2000, 203, 259.
2 M. Ghiaci, Z. Sadeghi, M. E. Sedaghat, H. Karimi-Maleh,
J. Safaei and A. Gil, Appl. Catal., A, 2010, 381, 121.
3 V. R. Choudhary, J. R. Indurkar and V. S. Narkhede, J. Catal.,
2004, 227, 257.
4 S. E. Dapurkar, H. Kawanami, T. Yokoyama and Y. Ikushima,
Catal. Commun., 2009, 10, 1025.
5 S. K. Jana, Y. Kubota and T. J. Tatsumi, J. Catal., 2007,
247, 214.
6 K. Bahranowski, R. Dula and M. Gasior, Appl. Clay Sci.,
2001, 18, 93.
7 S. Vetrivel and A. Pandurangan, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.,
2004, 217, 165.
8 K. George and S. Sugunan, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 149.
9 S. Vetrivel and A. Pandurangan, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2005,
44, 692.
10 X. G. Li, J. Wang and R. He, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2007, 18, 1053.
11 C. Guo, Q. Peng, Q. Liu and G. Jiang, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.,
2003, 192, 295.
12 C. Lu, Z. Fu, Y. Liu, F. Liu, Y. Wu, J. Qin, X. He and D. Yin,
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2010, 331, 106.
13 M. Arshadi and M. Ghiaci, Appl. Catal., A, 2011, 399, 75.
14 D. Habibi and A. R. Faraji, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2013, 276, 487.
15 D. Habibi, A. R. Faraji, M. Arshadi, H. Veisi and A. Gil,
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2014, 382, 41.
16 M. Arshadia, M. Ghiacia, A. A. Ensafia, H. Karimi-Maleh and
Steven L. Suib, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2011, 338, 71.
17 D. Habibi, A. R. Faraji, M. Arshadi, S. Heydari and A. Gil,
Appl. Catal., A, 2013, 466, 282.
18 R. Wang, B. Gao and W. Jiao, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2009, 255, 4109.
19 K. O. Xavier, J. Chacko and K. K. M. Yusuff, Appl. Catal., A,
2004, 258, 251.
20 K. O. Xavier, J. Chacko and K. K. M. Yusuff, J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem., 2002, 178, 275.
21 K. M. Parida and S. Soumya Dash, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.,
2009, 306, 54.
22 S. Vetrival and A. Pandurangan, Appl. Catal., A, 2004, 264,
243.
23 S. S. Bhoware, S. Shylesh, K. R. Kamble and A. P. Singh,
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2006, 255, 123.
Selective oxidation of EB
The oxidation of EB was conducted in a glass reactor equipped
with a condenser and magnetic stirrer. Typically, EB (10 mmol)
and a certain amount of catalyst were added, followed by
70% aqueous TBHP with a desired EB/TBHP molar ratio. The
reaction was performed at a certain temperature for a certain
period with continuous magnetic stirring at 1000 rpm. The
catalysts were separated by centrifugation. The yield of prod-
ucts was analyzed using an Agilent (GC-7890B) gas chromato-
graph with an HP-5 column and FID detector. The products
formed in the reactions were further characterized by GC-MS
analysis. The TON value was calculated based on the moles
of EB converted per mole of Co. In addition, leaching of
the metal during the course of the reaction was verified
by resubmission of the filtrate for further reaction under
the same reaction conditions. In the reusability tests, the
catalysts were removed from the reaction mixtures, washed
with ethyl alcohol and acetone, and dried at 80 °C for 12 h.
Then, fresh EB was employed in the repeated tests.
24 P. S. Singh, K. Kosuge, V. Ramaswamy and B. S. Rao,
Appl. Catal., A, 1999, 177, 149.
25 S. Devika, M. Palanichamy and V. Murugesan, Appl. Catal., A,
2011, 407, 76.
Catal. Sci. Technol.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014