Gonz a´ lez-N u´ n˜ ez et al.
product requires filtration of the reaction mixture to separate
the reduced chromium reagent and then evaporation of the
solvent. However, despite the considerable improvements in the
reaction conditions that these methods achieve, they do not avoid
the use of organic solvents or contamination of the product with
chromium species detached from the solid support under these
reaction conditions. Contamination also extends to the equip-
ment used to perform the reactions that, in the case of large-
scale preparative work, requires additional cleaning operations.
Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2), which has readily
accessible critical conditions (Tc) 31.0 °C, Pc ) 73.8 bar), a
truly benign character, and low cost, is a frequently discussed
FIGURE 1. Anchoring of chromate on the silica support.
lead to the formation of R-chromia (Cr O ), and the reagent
2
3
loses its reactivity in the oxidation of alcohols.
Prior to oxidations in scCO , the supported reagent was
2
4
e
assayed under standard reaction conditions to compare the
results obtained in each case. The reactions were carried out
by treating d-CrO ‚SiO with the corresponding alcohol (1) with
6
alternative reaction medium for chemical synthesis. Further-
3
2
more, there is an existing technology platform for the use of
scCO2 in large-scale applications in both the food and nutrition
industries. These properties have prompted intense research to
further develop the potential of scCO2 as an alternative solvent
for green chemistry.
an initial molar ratio of CrO :ROH 1:1 and a substrate
3
concentration of 0.2 M, in dichloromethane, at room temperature
4
e
for 15 min. The reaction mixture was filtered, and the solid
was thoroughly washed with dichloromethane. In all cases,
evaporation of the organic solvent yielded a pale yellow organic
8
We report here that supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) is
an effective reaction medium for the oxidation of primary and
secondary aliphatic alcohols to the corresponding carbonyl
compounds with chromium trioxide supported on silica. The
reactions were performed by flowing a solution of the alcohol
in scCO2 through a column containing the supported reagent
and recovering the product by depressurization. This method
avoids the use of organic solvents and contamination of the
products with chromium species. Handling of the Cr(VI) reagent
under the reaction conditions described here simply involves
placing a suitable polypropylene container charged with the
supported reagent into the column and removing it once the
reaction is complete.
residue. Flame absorption atomic spectroscopy (FAAS) analysis
of the reaction products determined the presence of 45-940
ppm (mg/Kg) of chromium in the reaction products, depending
on the water content of the organic solvent. In all cases, the
recovered solid was dark brown and loose. The results are shown
in Table 1.
The supported reagent d-CrO ‚SiO proved to be very
3
2
effective for performing the oxidation of alcohols to carbonyl
compounds (Table 1). The oxidation reactions did not lead to
any significant overoxidation of the primary aliphatic alcohols
to give the corresponding carboxylic acids. However, this
reagent is less effective in the oxidation of unsaturated alcohols
such as 5-penten-1-ol (1g) or citronellol (1i) (runs 7 and 9, Table
9
1
). Oxidation of the acid-sensitive citronellol (1i) was accom-
Results and Discussion
pained by acid-catalyzed isomerization giving a mixture of
products containing, among others, citronellal (2i), isopulegol,
isopulegone, and rose oxide.
The oxidation of alcohols with d-CrO3‚SiO2 in scCO2 was
carried out by flowing scCO2 (100 g CO2/h) at 220 bar and 40
The reactions were performed with CrO3 deposited on silica
(d-CrO3‚SiO2) that had been prepared by adding silica to an
aqueous solution of chromium trioxide in water and evaporating
the solvent under vacuum.4 The deposition of CrO3 onto the
silica surface yielded an intense orange solid that was dried
under vacuum until constant weight and stored at room
temperature in a desiccator. The Cr(VI) content of the reagent
was determined by redox titration with a 0.1 M aqueous solution
of Fe(NH4)2(SO4). The reagent used in the oxidation reactions
had a range of 1.0-2.0 mmol CrO3/g.
e
°
C for 4 h through a reservoir containing the substrate (2 mmol)
and then through a column packed with the supported reagent
molar ratio of alcohol:CrO3 1:3 in all cases), both placed in a
50-mL reactor (Figure 2). The system was depressurized
(
2
through a micrometric valve, and the reaction products were
collected in a trap cooled with liquid nitrogen. The procedure
is fully described in the Experimental Section. The organic
residues that were recovered after the trap was slowly heated
to room temperature were colorless, and Zeeman absorption
On the basis of the extensive data reported for the Phillips
7
catalysts and given the method of preparation of Cr(VI) on
silica and the loading of the reagent, the Cr(VI) anchored on
the supported reagent should have mainly a polychromate chain
structure bonded to the silanol groups at the silica surface
through the terminal chromate units (Figure 1). Upon calcination
at temperatures higher than 100 °C, the polychromate chains
8
atomic spectroscopy (ZAAS) analysis of the samples indicated
a chromium content of 0.8-1.7 ppb (µg/Kg). The solid reagent
in the column was dark brown and showed a loose appearance.
The results are shown in Table 1.
The oxidation of alcohols 1 with d-CrO3‚SiO2 in scCO2 was
very efficient, and the corresponding carbonyl compounds 2
were obtained in good yields and without any significant
contamination with chromium species detached from the sup-
ported reagent. Particularly in the case of substrates 1e and 1f,
which carry electron-withdrawing groups, the reactions were
much more efficient in scCO2 than in solution. Although the
oxidation was also effective for simple allylic alcohols, the
reaction became less efficient for unsaturated alcohols with more
distant double bonds. This characteristic can be attributed to
adsorption of the substrate on the reagent through Lewis acid-
(5) (a) Linares, M. L.; S a´ nchez, N.; Alajar ´ı n, R.; Vaquero, J. J.; AÄ lvarez-
Builla, J. Synthesis 2001, 382. (b) Shiney, A.; Rajan, P. K.; Sreekumar, K.
Indian J. Chem. B 1997, 36B, 769. (c) Peltonen, R. T.; Ekman, K. B.;
Nasman, J. H. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 235. (d) Brunelet, T.;
Jouitteau, C.; Gelbard, G. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 4016. (e) Fr e` chet, J. M.
J.; Darling, P.; Farrall, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1728. (f) Fr e` chet, J.
M. J.; Warnock, J.; Farrall, M. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 2618. (g) Cainelli,
G.; Cardillo, G.; Orena, M.; Sandri, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 6737.
(
h) Lee, R. A.; Donald, D. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3857.
(6) (a) Leitner, W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 746. (b) Chemical Synthesis
Using Supercritical Fluids; Jessop, P., Leitner, W., Eds. Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, New York, 1999. (c) McHugh, M.; Krukonis, V. J. Supercritical
Fluid Extraction; Butterworth-Heinemann: Boston, 1994. (d) Wells, S.;
DeSimone, J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 519.
(8) Willard, H. H.; Merritt, L. L., Jr.; Dean, J. A.; Settle, F. A., Jr.
Instrumental Methods of Analysis, 7th ed.l Wadsworth: Belmont, CA 1988.
(9) Corey, E. J.; Suggs, D. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 31, 2647.
(7) Groppo, E.; Lamberti, C.; Bordiga, S.; Spoto, G.; Zecchina, A. Chem.
ReV. 2005, 105, 115.
1040 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 71, No. 3, 2006