C.I. Fernandes et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 384 (2010) 84–93
85
in solution, while the latter optimize recovery and recycling of the
catalysts [13,14].
correlation given by Becke’s three-parameter hybrid functional
with Lee, Yang and Parr’s gradient-corrected correlation functional
[18]. The basis set for Mo and I consisted of the standard SDD basis
set [19] augmented with a f polarization function in all calculations
[20], while the 6-311G** basis set [21] was used on all remaining
atoms. The starting geometries of 2 and of 3 were based on spectro-
scopic and Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) [22] data and were
optimized without any symmetry constraints. Frequency calcula-
tions were performed at the same level of theory to confirm the
nature of the stationary points, yielding no imaginary frequencies
for the minima.
The tailoring of the catalyst based on both the supporting mate-
rial and the incorporation of the organometallic precursor must be
continuous. In particular, porous materials are very promising can-
didates for such purposes, as they offer a large surface area inside
the pores, but must be designed having in mind the need to afford
a stable (and reactive) material without blocking the access to the
catalytic active sites, so that the reaction can proceed and a good
contact between reactants is promoted.
In this work we have prepared amino acid containing clays,
which were consequently derivatized with organometallic Mo
cores. The resulting materials were tested in the catalytic epoxi-
dation of olefins where the heterogeneous performed better than
the corresponding complexes in homogeneous phase catalysis. All
this will be reported and discussed in more detail in the following
sections.
2.2. Preparation of the complexes and clay materials
2.2.1. General procedure for preparation of complexes
[MoI (CO) L] (L = trpH or pheH) (2, 3)
2
3
A solution of [MoI (CO) (NCCH ) ] (0.50 mmol) in MeOH
2
3
3 2
(10 mL) was treated with a solution of the desired ligand, either
trpH or pheH (1 mmol), in MeOH (5 mL). The resulting solution was
stirred for 14 h at room temperature. The desired complex pre-
cipitated and the solvent was filtered off. The complex was then
washed with hexane and dried under vacuum. All manipulations
were carried out under N2 atmosphere.
2
. Experimental
2.1. Materials
All preparations and manipulations were performed using
standard Schlenk techniques under nitrogen. Commercial grade
solvents were dried and deoxygenated by standard procedures,
distilled under nitrogen and kept over 4 Å molecular sieves
2.2.2. General procedure for preparation of amino acid
intercalated clay materials HT–L (L = trp or phe) (4, 5)
A
mixture of trpH (7.30 mmol) or pheH (7.30 mmol) in
(
3 Å for CH CN). Tryptophane (trpH) and phenylalanine (pheH),
freshly distilled dmf (10 mL) and deionized water (20 mL) with
1 equivalent of KOH was stirred until complete solubilization. This
solution was then added to a suspension of calcined HT (1.00 g)
in freshly distilled dmf (25 mL) at 343 K. The reaction mixture was
stirred at the same temperature for 48 h. All manipulations were
carried out under N2 atmosphere to prevent the uptake of car-
bonate anions. The resulting material was then filtered off, washed
three times with deionized water (3× 20 mL), and dried in a desic-
cator under vacuum.
3
Mg,Al-hydrotalcite (HT), tert-butylhydroperoxide (TBHP), and
cyclooctene (cy8) and styrene (sty), were purchased from Aldrich
and used as received. Prior to the intercalation experiments com-
mercial hydrotalcite was calcined (823 K for 4 h) in order to
eliminate all the carbonate anions [9]. The precursor organometal-
lic complex [MoI (CO) (NCCH ) ] (1) was prepared according to
2
3
3 2
the literature methods [8,15].
Powder XRD data were collected on a Phillips PW1710 diffrac-
tometer using Cu K␣ radiation filtered by graphite. FTIR spectra
were measured with a Nicolet Nexus 6700 FTIR spectrometer using
KBr pellets (for complexes) in transmission mode and also using dif-
fuse reflectance (for clay materials). All FTIR spectra were measured
2.2.3. General procedure for preparation of organometallic clay
materials HT–L–Mo (L = trp or phe) (6, 7)
A solution of [MoI (CO) (NCCH ) ] (1) (0.34 g, 0.65 mmol) in dry
2
3
3 2
−1
using 2 cm resolution.
CH Cl (5 mL) was added to a suspension of 1.00 g of the HT inter-
2 2
UV/vis spectra were measured with a Shimadzu UV-2450PC
spectrometer equipped with a temperature controlled cell. All
calated material HT–L (4 or 5) in dry CH Cl2 (20 mL). The reaction
mixture was stirred under a N2 atmosphere, at room temperature,
for 24 h. The resulting material was then filtered off, washed twice
2
−4
spectra were measured as 10 M solutions using CH CN as solvent
3
in the 190–900 nm range.
with CH Cl2 (2× 20 mL), and dried in a desiccator under vacuum.
2
1H and 13C solution NMR spectra were obtained at 400.13 MHz
and 100.62 MHz, respectively, with a Bruker Avance 400 spectrom-
2.3. Characterization of complexes and clay materials
eter using CD OD or (CD ) SO as solvent. Chemical shifts are quoted
3
3 2
in ppm from TMS.
2.3.1. [MoI (CO) (trpH)] (2)
2
3
13C solid state NMR measurements were performed at room
temperature on a Bruker MSL 300P spectrometer operating at
Yield: 92%. C14H12N O5I Mo (639.95) calcd.: C 26.26, H 1.89, N
2 2
4.38; found: C 26.17, H 2.12, N 4.54.
7
5.47 MHz. The standard magic angle spinning (MAS) cross-
IR (KBr, ꢀ cm−1): 3455 (vs), 1986 (vw) (s), 1932 (m), 1892 (s),
1754 (s), 1627 (vs), 1496 (w), 1455 (w), 1030 (m).
polarization–dipolar decoupling RF pulse sequence (CP–DD) was
used under about 3.8 kHz spinning rate. 13C spectra were recorded
UV/vis [10 M in CH CN, ꢁ nm (ε M cm )]: 282 (30460), 345
−4
−1
−1
3
◦
with a pulse duration of 5 s (corresponding to 90 magnetiza-
(5640), 440 (1870).
1
tion tip angle), 2 ms contact time, 4 s recycling delay and a number
of scans of about 15000. The Hartmann–Hahn condition was opti-
mized using glycine, also the external reference to set the chemical
H NMR (400.13 MHz, CD OD, r.t., ı ppm): 7.70 (d, H ,
3
9
J8,9 = 8.6 Hz), 7.35 (d, H , J = 8.7 Hz), 7.16 (s, H5), 7.09 (t, H ), 7.01
6
6,7
8
(t, H7, J7,8 = 8.0 Hz), 3.58–3.62 (m, H ), 3.33 (m, H3b), 2.86–2.98 (m,
2
1
3
shift scale ( CO at 176.1 ppm).
H3a).
13
Microanalyses for CHN and Mo quantification were performed
at CACTI, University of Vigo. CHN analyses were performed on a
Fisons EA 1108; Mo quantification was performed on a Perkin Elmer
Optima 4300DV using In as internal standard.
C NMR (100.62 MHz, CD OD, r.t., ı ppm): 178.9 (COOH), 136.9
3
(C11), 127.5 (C10), 123.3 (C5), 121.0 (C ), 118.3 (C ), 118.1 (C7), 110.9
8
9
(C ), 110.2 (C ), 56.2 (C ), 30.2 (C ).
6
4
2
3
DFT calculations [16] were performed using the Gaussian03 [17]
program, revision C02, with the B3LYP hybrid functional, which
includes a mixture of Hartree–Fock exchange with DFT exchange-
2.3.2. [MoI (CO) (pheH)] (3)
2 3
Yield: 89%. C12H11NO5I Mo (600.78) calcd.: C 23.97, H 1.85, N
2
2.33; found: C 23.58, H 1.88, N 2.21.