62
A. Quintanilla et al. / Journal of Catalysis 257 (2008) 55–63
HMDS was the most efficient silylating agent, providing the
most hydrophobic Pd/SiO2 surface. It is also the most stable among
those investigated (Fig. 3). Comparing the DTG profiles of the fresh
and used silylated catalysts (Fig. 3), we can deduce that the HMDS-
silylated catalyst lost only a small fraction of the methyl groups
during the hydrogenation reaction.
DDMS did not act as a stable silylating agent for the hydrogena-
tion of aromatic ketones. The DTG results showed a complete ab-
sence of methyl groups after the reaction. Moreover, in the DRIFT
spectra of the used DDMS-silylated catalyst (not shown), a new
−1
band appeared at 3740 cm , attributed to terminal or geminal
silanol groups. This can be explained by the interaction between
Si–CH3 groups and water produced on the hydrogenation reaction,
resulting in hydrolysis of the O–Si bonds. This structure is known
to be less stable in the presence of water [24].
◦
During the in situ reduction (at 100 C and 10 atm) of Pd/SiO2,
the dispersion decreased by 50% and it decreased no further dur-
ing the reaction (Table 1). It is significant that this did not affect
the activity; the activity of the Pd/SiO2 catalyst was fully recovered
after regeneration (Fig. 7).
Fig. 10. Correlation of the relative adsorption strength of 4-IBPE to 4-IBAP with the
selectivity at 30% of 4-IBAP conversion. Conditions: CIBAP ≈ 0.12 mol/L, CIBPE ≈
0
.12 mol/L, CIBEB ≈ 0.12 mol/L, T = 293 K, p = 1 bar, t = 4 h, wcat = 0.05 g, VL =
.1 mL, solvent n-decane.
Silylation did not promote Pd sintering. Spent silylated cata-
lysts exhibited a similar decrease in dispersion as the untreated
catalysts except when amines and methyl groups were poisoning
the Pd sites, as in the HMDS-silylated catalyst, in which case Pd
sintering seemed to be suppressed (Table 1). Only silylation with
HMDS, with no post-treatment, affected the textural properties of
the Pd/SiO2 catalyst. The HMDS-silylated catalyst had a slightly re-
duced specific surface area and pore volume, due to the presence
of alkylsilane groups at the surface of the pores, in agreement with
previous reports [3,7].
1
relative adsorption of 4-IBPE/4-IBAP on the initial overall selectiv-
ity. The regenerated Pd/SiO2 catalyst demonstrated a high relative
adsorption 4-IBPE/4-IBAP value compared with the fresh catalyst,
but with a decrease in selectivity.
The silylating agent had a strong impact on the selectivity of
fresh and regenerated catalysts. Only HMDS, the most effective
silylating agent, improved the selectivity of the untreated catalyst.
The most remarkable finding is that the properly silylated catalysts
Silylation did not provoke Pd leaching under the conditions
used here in any of the agents except DDMS. In this case, to avoid
strong leaching of Pd (ca. 70%), the silica support was first sily-
lated, followed by Pd application. As a result, the Pd loading was
lower than the target value due to the smaller amount of anchor-
ing centers for Pd in the silica surface.
(
HMDS and DDMS) remained selective after regeneration (Fig. 8).
This can be explained in terms of the adsorption strength of re-
actants and products on the support, not on the Pd sites (Figs. 3
and 10). In these regenerated silylated catalysts, the adsorption of
4
-IBPE relative to 4-IBAP did not change as much (CAT-HMDS) or
even decreased (CAT-DDMS) compared with their fresh counter-
parts. Their behavior on regeneration was even more spectacular,
with selectivity remaining at ca. 80% (Fig. 10).
4
.2. Selective hydrogenation
Based on these findings, we can conclude that the competi-
tive adsorption of the reactant and product on the catalyst had an
important effect on the selectivity of this hydrogenation reaction,
a correlation illustrated in Fig. 10. Silylation reduced the polarity
of the surface and thus the adsorption of ketone 4-IBAP and al-
cohol product 4-IBPE. The likelihood of alcohol forming hydrogen
bridges with the surface was reduced significantly, so that the rel-
ative composition of the adsorbed phase on the metal changed
in favor of the ketone by equilibria such as shown in Eq. (10).
This increased the first hydrogenation step [Eq. (4)] relative to the
undesired second hydrogenation [Eq. (7)], resulting in a more fa-
vorable yield of alcohol. Apparently, silylation also stabilized the
relative adsorption of the product 4-IBPE to the reactant 4-IBAP on
regeneration of the catalyst, in contrast with the situation for the
untreated Pd/SiO2 catalyst, in which this changed unfavorably on
regeneration (Fig. 9), promoting the consecutive reaction and re-
sulting in low selectivity.
Previously, silylation to reduce the surface polarity of catalysts
has been applied mainly to selective oxidation reactions, for which
the products obviously are more polar than the reactants and are
more prone to consecutive conversion or strong adsorption. The
present study has demonstrated that this approach can be ap-
plied to certain selective hydrogenations as well, when the prod-
ucts formed interact through hydrogen bridges with the surface
silanol groups, such as in the hydrogenation of a ketone, alde-
hyde, or epoxide to an alcohol. Clearly, in such cases, changing the
hydrophobic properties of catalyst surfaces can improve reaction
selectivity.
Silylation affected the hydrophobic character of the catalysts
and, consequently, the adsorption of organic reactants and prod-
ucts (Fig. 9) and thus the activity (Fig. 7) and selectivity (Fig. 8).
All silylated catalysts would be expected to be less active than the
untreated catalyst, because the Pd active sites are exposed to lower
local concentrations of 4-IBAP (Fig. 9). Our experiments shown in
Fig. 7 confirm this hypothesis, except for the fresh DDMS-silylated
catalyst. This higher activity may be due to a promoting effect of
chlorides remaining on the support after silylation. The low activity
seen in the HMDS-silylated samples can be attributed to poisoning
of the Pd sites by amine groups, as confirmed by comparing the
activity of CAT-HMDS and the heat-treated sample CAT-HMDS520,
in the latter, the fresh catalyst demonstrated greater activity.
The decreased activity in the nonmodified Pd/SiO2 catalyst
from 25 to 1 mol/(kgPd s) in a consecutive run can be attributed
to the large amount of 4-IBAP physisorbed/chemisorbed on the sil-
ica surface and chemisorbed on the Pd sites (Fig. 3). In agreement
with this, DRIFT spectra (Fig. 5) of the untreated Pd/SiO2 catalyst
confirmed the loss of isolated hydroxyl groups on the silica and
the appearance of methyl groups, alkoxy groups, and silyl ether
groups. Hydration of the catalyst also occurred, as indicated by the
−1
increased band range from 3500 to 3400 cm . Thus, Pd/SiO2 cat-
alyst deactivated during the reaction ([16], Fig. 7) due to surface
deposition mainly on the support and also on the Pd.
Although regeneration removed the deposits and allowed the
recovery of activity, it changed the adsorption properties of un-
treated Pd/SiO2 catalyst (Fig. 9). Fig. 10 shows the effect of the