Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Research Article
tion to generate the phenoxide ion with moderate abundance
produced by two parallel rearrangements and each rearrange-
ment reaction contributes mainly to the intensity of one
product ion. In the following this is proved in two steps, (1) by
testing the feasibility of the rearrangement reactions using IRC
calculations and then (2) by correlating the experimental
intensities and the activation energies in a quantitative manner.
PM3 semiempirical relaxed scans were performed to
explore the potential energy surface using deprotonated N-
benzoylbenzenesulfonamide 2a as a model ion followed by
DFT calculations at the critical points. An IRC calculation was
performed to confirm the located TS saddle point lies on the
minimum energy path between the assumed minima (2a and
(
57%). Similar mechanisms with larger aliphatic acyl groups,
such as propionyl 5 and pentanoyl 6, afford higher product ion
abundances as 75% and 81%, respectively.
N-Acetyl-Substituted Benzenesulfonamide Derivatives.
Substitution effects on the benzene ring of benzenesulfonyl
also were investigated, and N-acetyl-4-methylbenzenesulfona-
mide 7 and N-acetyl-4-bromobenzenesulfonamide 8 provide
their corresponding product ions with abundances at 35% and
36
6
6%, respectively. The results may be rationalized by the ability
of the Br to stabilize the negative charge on oxygen atom of the
product ion. However, the carboxyl group on the benzene ring
for 2-(N-acetylsulfamoyl)benzoic acid 9 provides an abun-
dance of the phenoxide ion at only 23%. The main reason is
that proton loss from the carboxyl group of compound 9
within the ESI source is very facile in negative mode, resulting
in the subsequent loss of a neutral carbon dioxide as the
predominant pathway.
Other Benzenesulfonamide Derivatives. The existence of
an amide bond (CONH ) in the compound structure is critical
2
for giving rise to the rearrangement reaction; in the case of 2-
oxo-S-phenyl-2-(piperidin-1-yl)ethane-1-sulfonamido 10
where a CH is inserted into the amide bond, only 2%
2
abundance of rearrangement ion was observed. Annular
sulfonamide like 1,1-dioxo-1,2-benzothiazol-3-one 11 does
not show the rearrangement behavior due to stability of the
five-membered ring. Even when the normalized collision
energy is raised to 100 no pronounced product ion peaks are
observed. Sulfonylurea compound 12 also does not give the
rearrangement product ion, instead forming the benzenesulfo-
namide and anilide anion as the dominated peaks such as N-
phenyl benzenesulfonamide 1a does.
Theoretical Calculations. As pointed out by Herman and
Figure 6. Intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) diagram of the N−O
3
4
Harrison, at low internal energies, the relative rates of
competing fragmentation reactions are determined largely by
their relative activation energies. Hence, intrinsic reaction
coordinate and activation energy calculations were used to
assess the feasibility of parallel rearrangement reactions
involved in the fragmentation of sulfonamides. Reactions
with multiple product channels have been studied before using
the direct-measurement kinetics method and theoretical
rearrangement and Smiles rearrangement showing the chemical
structures involved in the process, the activation energy (E ), and
a
the thermal result of the reaction. E and ΔH were estimated from the
a
electronic energies; other contributions are too small to be of any
significance. The dashed lines do not represent calculated points and
only serve to guide the eye.
shows the N−O rearrangement is possible, and it produces a
physically reasonable activation energy of 247.5 kJ/mol. Also
note that the rearrangement is kinetically controlled because
both isomers are almost equally thermodynamically stable. The
reaction is barely exothermic with the rearranged ion 2c being
11 kJ/mol more stable than the original anion 2a. These same
calculations were performed for the different rearrangement
reactions of the parent ion.
Figure 6 also shows the IRC path for the Smiles-type
rearrangement. The activation energy for this process is 165.5
kJ/mol, significantly lower than for the N−O rearrangement,
so this mechanism dominates the low energy end of the
spectrum (initial stages), although the intermediate product 2b
(fragment ion + neutral) is thermodynamically less stable by
52.0 kJ/mol. Therefore, the spectrum of 2a is the result of at
least two major rearrangements of the parent ion, a Smiles-type
rearrangement and a N−O rearrangement. (The 3D structures
their electronic energies are given in Table S1 of the
Supporting Information). In addition, Meyerson’s rearrange-
ment directly originated from 2a provides a significant
contribution to the intensity of the ion at m/z 93 in a more
convoluted way (see the discussion below). The spectrum also
3
5
calculations.
In this work, there are several experimental observations that
are not compatible with a single fragmentation pathway. For
−
example, Figure 3 shows that the ion at m/z 93 (C H O )
6
6
appears first and it seems to be produced directly from the
parent ion in the initial stages. This observation goes along
with a Smiles-type rearrangement; however, the Smiles
rearrangement cannot explain the intense peaks at m/z 157
and 141 or the intense peak at m/z 93 in the spectrum of the
labeled compound (Figure 5). On the other hand, a N−O
rearrangement mechanism is appropriate to explain the
product ions at m/z 157 and 141 and it is expected to
contribute marginally to the intensity of the product ion at m/z
3. Also, there is no evidence that the peak at m/z 141 is
produced by the loss of an oxygen atom from benzenesulfonate
m/z 157). The production of these ions runs parallel at a rate
that is approximately an order of magnitude higher for the
product ion at m/z 141. It seems that both ions can be
produced from the same transition state of the N−O
rearrangement depending on the cleavage site to form
sulfonate ion or sulfinate ion. Based on this experimental
evidence, it is likely that the observed fragment ions are
9
(
8
11
J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 32, 806−814