Published on Web 06/10/2003
Formation, Structure, and Structural Properties of a New
Filamentary Tubular Form: Hollow Conical-Helix of Graphitic
Boron Nitride
Fang-Fang Xu,* Yoshio Bando, Renzhi Ma, Dmitri Golberg, Yubao Li, and
Masanori Mitome
Contribution from the AdVanced Materials Laboratory and Nanomaterials Laboratory,
National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan
Received January 3, 2003; E-mail: xu.fangfang@nims.go.jp
Abstract: A novel tubular form of graphitic boron nitride (BN) displaying a hollow conical-helix was
discovered. It was generated via wrapping a single beltlike filament according to the geometry of an
Archimedes spiral. Cone apex angles of helical-conical nanotubes (HCNTs) were found to exhibit specific
values, each of which refers to a certain coincidence site lattice. A unique structural property of HCNTs
was observed, displaying the transformation of apex angles during the annealing process. The observed
apex angles were reduced with decreasing annealing temperature, which is in accordance with an estimated
HCNT strain energy decrease for a given tubular radius. It is suggested that the curvature and apex angle
of a HCNT are determined by a sole dynamic element, that is, enthalpy (∆H), whereas the HCNT disclination
configuration changes through helical sliding of the filament.
Introduction
forming high densities of coincidence lattice sites between
overlapping layers;2b,c they were observed to be 13.2°, 21.8°,
A graphitic-like filament may form various curved structures
such as fullerenes, nanotubes, and cones. Among these, graphitic
nanotube is perhaps the most intriguing nanomaterial that has
been proven to possess unmatched physicochemical properties
and remarkable application potential. Cylindrical C and boron
nitride (BN) nanotubes are composed of graphene sheets parallel
to the tube axis independent of its chirality.1 By contrast,
turbostratic nanofibers of C and BN exhibit abundant morphol-
ogies, for example, so-called jellyfish, backbone, herringbone,
horsetail, and bamboo-like. The last two morphologies contain
cone-shaped compartments, whereas the herringbone-like fibers
are the solid cones.
It has been indicated that the apex angle (θapex) of a stacked
(i.e., nonhelical) cone can only display a limited number of
values, which are determined by the disclination angles (θD) of
multiple n of 60° (where n is a positive integer between 1 and
5).2 Theoretically, due to the higher stability of B-N bonds
relative to B-B and N-N bonds, there is a further restriction
for θD in “hat-stacked” BN cones, which thus show angles of
120° and 240° only.3 However, for helical cones, the apex angles
have a somewhat broad selection due to the introduction of an
overlap angle (θover) in addition to the n60° disclination issue.
The overlap angles are determined according to the criteria of
and 27.8° in overlapping h-BN platelets.3,4
Although curved filamentary nanostructures are fairly clear,
their nucleation and growth mechanisms have not yet been well
understood. Among the various formation models, the ring-
stacking model5 suggested creation of curved surfaces via the
selective assembly of monocyclic rings. In the case of the conical
shape, it has been found that a single polygon defect, for
example, a two- to five-membered atomic ring, is sufficient to
form a twisted nucleus followed by further lateral growth of
hexagons.2,4b This could be the case for solid cone particles. In
the case of conical-shaped bamboo-like fibers with round conical
caps, several reports have claimed similar formation mechanisms
relying on growth on the conical catalytic particles.6,7 Thus, cone
apex angles have been suggested to strongly depend on the shape
of the catalytic templates.
In the present paper, the synthesis of novel BN HCNTs with
high purity is reported. Helical-conical BN nanotubes having
no caps were observed. Because no catalytic particles were
detected at the bottom of the cones, a new formation mechanism
is proposed.
(4) (a) Bourgeois, L.; Bando, Y.; Shinozaki, S.; Kurashima, K.; Sato, T. Acta
Crystallogr., Sect. A 1999, 55, 168. (b) Bourgeois, L.; Bando, Y.;
Kurashima, K.; Sato, T. Philos. Mag. A 2000, 80, 129.
(5) Wakabayashi, T.; Achiba, Y. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 190, 465.
(6) (a) Chen, Y.; Chadderton, L. T.; Gerald, J. F.; Williams, J. S. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 1999, 74, 2960. (b) Chadderton, L. T.; Chen, Y. J. Cryst. Growth
2002, 240, 164. (c) Gerald, J. F.; Chen, Y.; Conway, M. J. Appl. Phys. A
2003, 76, 107.
(7) (a) Blank, V. D.; Gorlova, I. G.; Hutchison, J. L.; Kiselev, N. A.; Ormont,
A. B.; Polyakov, E. V.; Sloan, J.; Zakharov, D. N.; Zybtsev, S. G. Carbon
2000, 38, 1217. (b) Terrones, H.; Hayashi, T.; Munoz-Navia, M.; Terrones,
M.; Kim, Y. A.; Grobert, N.; Kamalakaran, R.; Dorantes-Davila, J.;
Escudero, R.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Endo, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 343,
241.
(1) (a) Iijima, S. Nature 1991, 354, 56. (b) Chopra, N. G.; Luyken, R. J.;
Cherrey, K.; Crespi, V. H.; Cohen, M. L.; Louie, S. G.; Zettle, A. Science
1995, 269, 966. (c) Loiseau, A.; Willaime, F.; Demoncy, N.; Hug, G.;
Pascard, H. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1996, 76, 4737.
(2) (a) Double, D. D.; Hellawell, A. Acta Metall. 1974, 22, 481. (b) Amelinckx,
S.; Luyten, W.; Krekels, T.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Van Landuyt, J. J. Cryst.
Growth 1992, 121, 543. (c) Krishnan, A.; Dujardin, E.; Treacy, M. M. J.;
Hugdahl, J.; Lynum, S.; Ebbesen, T. W. Nature 1997, 388, 451.
(3) Bourgeois, L.; Bando, Y.; Han, W. Q.; Sato, T. Phys. ReV. B 2000, 61,
7686.
9
8032
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2003, 125, 8032-8038
10.1021/ja030003m CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society