4
eutectic solvent: (a) Lee KS, Anisur RM, Kim KW, Kim WS,
Park T-J, Kang EJ, Lee IS. Chem. Mater. 2012; 24: 682–687. (b)
Azizi N, Rahimi Z, Alipour M. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 61191–61198.
13. Liu X, Ma Z, Xing J, Liu H. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2004; 270: 1–
6.
14. (a) Sauerbrey S, Majhi PK, Daniels J, Schnakenburg G, Brändle
GM, Scherer K, Streubel R. Inorg. Chem. 2011; 50: 793–799. (b)
Howson SE, Allan LEN, Chmel NP, Clarkson GJ, Deeth RJ,
Faulkner AD, Simpson DH, Scott P. Dalton Trans. 2011; 40:
10416–10433.
In conclusion, we prepared
a
magnetite-supported
imidazolium hydrogen carbonate. By employing the magnetite-
supported imidazolium hydrogen carbonate as an NHC catalyst,
the cyanosilylation of aldehydes and ketones proceeded at 60 °C.
Moreover, the magnetic catalyst was readily recovered by use of
an external magnet and could be reused up to five times for
cyanosilylation.
15. Selected Data for Compound 5
Black powder. IR (KBr): 3402, 2924, 2855, 1767, 1636, 1504,
Acknowledgments
-1
1373 cm . Anal.; found (%): C, 4.31; H, 0.77; N, 0.44; I, 0.82.
The loading of 5 was estimated from the difference between the
residual iodine content of 5 and the iodine content of 4, which is
shown in the Supporting Information. An X-ray diffraction pattern
is also shown in the Supporting Information.
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number
26410200 and the New Energy and Industrial Technolohy
Development Organization (NEDO).
16. From the results of an elemental analysis of iodine of 5,15 it was
found that 5 contains a small amount of a residual imidazolium
iodide unit.
Supplementary Material
17. 2-Propanol is the most effective solvent for the NHC-catalyzed
22
carboxylative cyclization of propargylic amine with CO2 and for
Supplementary data (experimental procedures, analytical data
1
of 1, 3, 4 and 5, H and 13C NMR data of 1, 3 and 7, X-ray
diffraction patterns of magnetite, 4 and 5) associated with this
the
NHC-catalyzed
tautomerization
of
5-alkylidene-2-
oxazolidinone to 2-oxazolone.23 Thus, the low chemical yield of
the trimethylsilylated cyanohydrin 7a is probably because
trimethylsilyl cyanide, rather than the catalyst 5, was consumed by
an excess amount of 2-propanol.
article can be found, in the online version , at http://
.
References and Notes
18. Typical Procedure (Table 1, entry 6)
To
a mixture of benzaldehyde 6a (637 mg, 6.01 mmol),
1. (a) Flanigan DM, Romanov-Michailidis F, White NA, Rovis T.
Chem. Rev. 2015; 115: 9307–9387. (b) Naumann S, Dove AP.
Polym. Chem. 2015; 6: 3185–3200. (c) Fèvre M, Pinaud J,
Gnanou Y, Vignolle J, Taton D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013; 42: 2142–
2172. (d) Marion N, Díez-González S, Nolan SP. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 2988–3000.
2. Dröge T, Glorius F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 6940–6952.
3. (a) Hollóczki O, Terleczky P, Szieberth D, Mourgas G, Gudat D,
Nyulászi L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 780–789. (b) Denk MK,
Rodezno JM, Gupta S, Lough AJ. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001;
617–618: 242–253.
trimethylsilyl cyanide (607 mg, 6.12 mmol) and degassed hexane
(6 mL) was added the magnetite-supported imidazolium hydrogen
carbonate 5 (9.6 mg, 0.0012 mmol) under an argon atmosphere.
The reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 30 min under an
argon atmosphere. The magnetic catalyst 5 was separated by
magnetic decantation using an external magnet, and the reaction
mixture was then transferred out of the reaction vessel, followed
by washing of the magnetic catalyst 5 with hexane four times
under an argon atmosphere, and the rinse solution was combined
with the reaction mixture. The chemical yield of trimethylsilylated
cyanohydrin 7a was determined by integration of 1H NMR
absorptions with reference to 1,3,5-tri-t-butylbenzene as an
internal standard, which was added to the combined mixture
(>99% yield).
4. Nair V, Bindu S, Sreekumar V. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004; 43:
5130–5135.
5. (a) Van Ausdall BR, Glass JL, Wiggins KM, Aarif AM, Louie J.
J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 7935–7942. (b) Delaude L. Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem. 2009; 1681–1699. (c) Csihony S, Culkin DA, Sentman AC,
Dove AP, Waymouth RM, Hedrick JL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;
127: 9079–9084. (d) Nyce GW, Csihony S, Waymouth RM,
Hedrick JL. Chem. Eur. J. 2004; 10. 4073–4079. (e) Duong HA,
Tekavec TN, Arif AM, Louie J. Chem. Commun. 2004; 112–113.
6. (a) Fèvre M, Pinaud J, Leteneur A, Gnanou Y, Vignolle J, Taton
D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 6776–6784. (b) Fèvre M,
Coupillaud P, Miqueu K, Sotiropoulos J-M, Vignolle J, Taton D.
J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 10135–10144.
19. The reaction in Table 2 was carried out according to the procedure
in Table 1, entry 6.18 In the case of the isolation of 7 (Table 2,
entries 1 and 8 in parentheses), the collected hexane solution of 7
by magnetic decantation was evaporated under reduced pressure,
and the residue was purified by HPLC (JAI LC-908; JAIGEL-1H,
2H column, chloroform as eluent).
20. Li Y, Wang J, Wu Y, Zhu H, Samuel PP, Roesky HW. Dalton
Trans. 2013; 42: 13715–13722.
21. The magnetically recovered catalyst 5, which was washed with the
solvent after the prior cyanosilylation,18 was reused for the
subsequent cyanosilylation by the addition of benzaldehyde 6a,
trimethylsilyl cyanide, and hexane to the reaction vessel under an
argon atmosphere.
7. (a) Wang D, Deraedt C, Ruiz J, Astruc D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015;
48: 1871–1880. (b) Baig RBN, Nadagouda MN, Varma RS. Cood.
Chem. Rev. 2015; 287: 137–156. (c) Dalpozzo R. Green Chem.
2015; 17: 3671–3686. (d) Rossi LM, Costa NJS, Silva FP,
Wojcieszak R. Green Chem. 2014; 16: 2906–2933. (e) Baig RBN,
Varma RS. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 752–770. (f) Polshettiwar
V, Luque R, Fihri A, Zhu H, Bouhrara M, Basset J-M. Chem. Rev.
2011; 111: 3036–3075. (g) Schätz A, Reiser O, Stark WJ. Chem.
Eur. J. 2010; 16: 8950–8967.
22. Fujita K, Fujii A, Sato J, Onozawa S, Yasuda H. Tetrahedron Lett.
2016; 57: 1282–1284.
23. Fujita K, Sato J, Yasuda H. Synlett 2015; 26: 1106–1110.
8. Fujita K, Fujii A, Sato J, Yasuda H. Synlett 2016; 27: 1941–1944.
9. (a) Fujita K, Umeki S, Yasuda H. Synlett 2013; 24: 947–950. (b)
Fujita K, Umeki S, Yamazaki M, Ainoya T, Tsuchimoto T,
Yasuda H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 3137–3140.
10. Previously reported polymer-supported NHC catalysts: (a) Seo
UR, Chung YK. RSC Adv. 2014; 4: 32371–32374. (b) Coupillaud
P, Pinaud J, Guidolin N, Vignolle J, Fèvre M, Veaudecrenne E,
Mecerreyes D, Taton D. J. Polym. Sci. Part A. Polym. Chem.
2013; 51: 4530–4540. (c) Powell AB, Suzuki Y, Ueda M,
Bielawski CW, Cowley AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 5218–
5220. (d) Pinaud J, Vignolle J, Gnanou Y, Taton, D.
Macromolecules 2011; 44: 1900–1908. (e) Pawar GM,
Buchmeiser MR. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010; 352: 917–928. (f) Tan
M, Zhang Y, Ying JY. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009; 351: 1390–1394.
11. Previously reported NHC-catalyzed cyanosilylations of aldehydes
and ketones: (a) Suzuki Y, Bakar AMD, Muramatsu K, Sato M.
Tetrahedron 2006; 62: 4227–4231. (b) Fukuda Y, Maeda Y, Ishii
S, Kondo K, Aoyama T. Synthesis 2006; 4: 589–590. (c) Song JJ,
Gallou F, Reeves JT, Tan Z, Yee NK, Senanayake CH. J. Org.
Chem. 2006; 71: 1273–1276.
12. Recently reported Fe3O4/MnO hybrid nanocrystals-catalyzed
cyanosilylations and Fe3O4-catalyzed cyanosilylations in a deep