Communication
Catalysis Science & Technology
−
1
graphene catalyst are presented in Fig. 1A and B. Homoge-
highest TOF of 49.73 h for the cross-coupling of iodo-
7
neous Cu O nanoparticles with mean diameter of about
benzene and phenol. Under the same reaction conditions,
2
8
nm are uniformly dispersed on the surface of graphene
2
the TOF of Cu O/graphene catalyst is about 25 times higher
sheets. The lattice fringe of the nanoparticles has an inter-
planar spacing of 0.25 nm, which is in agreement with the
than that of the nanocomposite. No product was detected
in the absence of Cs CO . It is mainly because that Cs CO
2
3
2
3
(
(
111) plane of cubic Cu
XRD, Fig. 1C), all of the strong diffraction peaks can be
2
O. In the X-ray diffraction patterns
can enhance the nucleophilicity of phenols and accelerate
the detachment of H species in phenols and therefore pro-
mote the coupling reaction.
indexed to the (111), (200), (220), (311) lattice planes of
Cu O, confirming that Cu exists on the graphene sheets pri-
marily as the cuprous phase. X-ray photoelectron spectros-
copy (XPS) of the catalyst can further confirm it. In Fig. 1D,
the binding energies of Cu 2p3/2 at around 932.8 eV and Cu
2
To explore the influence of different substituents on the
coupling reactions of aryl halides with phenols, we employed
various phenols to react with different iodobenzene deriva-
tives. The presence of electron-donating groups such as
methoxy or methyl in iodobenzene can slightly decrease the
reaction yield (Table 1, entries 2–4). In contrast, the electron-
withdrawing groups such as acetyl or nitro in iodobenzene
can increase the reaction yield (entries 5–6). However, the
influences of electron-donating (entries 7–8) and electron-
withdrawing groups (entries 9–10) in phenol are opposite to
those in the aryl halides. When the electron-donating groups
are simultaneously presented in iodobenzene and phenol,
the reaction yield will further decrease (entry 11).
+
0
2
p1/2 at 952.2 eV can be attributed to the Cu and Cu states,
1
2
respectively. The existence of metallic phase Cu indicates
that the catalyst precursor was over-reduced in the prepara-
tion process. Our previous work has demonstrated that
metallic Cu nanoparticles can stably exist on the graphene
sheets. The XPS results presented here further suggest that
some of the metastable nanoparticles can be stabilized by
using graphene as the support.
1
1
We tested several Cu
2
O/graphene catalysts with different
Cu O loadings and found that the 5 wt.% Cu O/graphene
showed the best catalytic activity for the cross-coupling of
phenol and iodobenzene. Therefore, all of the reactions in
Besides aryl iodides, the catalyst can also catalyze the cou-
pling reactions of aryl bromides and chlorides with phenol
derivatives to produce the corresponding aryl ethers. From
the results shown in Table 2, the catalyst showed lower activ-
ity for aryl bromides and chlorides due to their low reactivity
2
2
this work were performed over the 5 wt.% Cu O/graphene
2
catalyst. The reaction results for the cross-coupling of phe-
nols and iodides are summarized in Table 1. All of the reac-
tions were conducted in a sealed reactor under the protection
of argon. The yield of diphenyl ether from the cross-coupling
of phenol and iodobenzene is 96% and the TOF is high, up
4
(entries 1–4).
For comparison, we also prepared graphene-supported Cu
and CuO nanoparticles as the catalysts for the cross-coupling
reaction of phenol and iodobenzene. The CuO/graphene was
prepared by a facile impregnation method. The Cu/graphene
catalyst here was completely the same as that used in our
−
1
to 1282 h (Table 1, entry 1). Saberi et al. collected the TOF
results over different catalysts and found that the carbon
1
1
nanotube-supported α-Fe
2
O
3
@CuO nanocomposite has the
previous work. Under the same reaction conditions, the
TOF values over 5 wt.% Cu/graphene and 5 wt.% CuO/
graphene are 291 (49% iodobenzene conversion) and 393
(
53%), respectively. When only graphene was used as the cat-
alyst, only 3% yield of diphenyl ether was detected. These
results suggest that graphene-supported Cu or CuO nano-
particles also possess considerable catalytic activity for the
cross-coupling. However, the TOF values of both catalysts are
further lower than that of the Cu O/graphene catalyst. There-
2
fore, the active component in the catalyst for the Ullmann
cross-coupling should be Cu O.
2
We investigated the yield of diphenyl ether from the
reaction of phenol and iodobenzene at different times and
found that the reaction just reached its equilibrium at 3 h.
Therefore, the product yield at 3 h was monitored for five suc-
cessive rounds to test the recyclability of the Cu
catalyst. A slight decrease in the catalytic activity was detected
Fig. 2A). The product yield in the first round was 96%, and it
2
O/graphene
(
decreased to 94.4% after 5 rounds. The TEM image (Fig. 2B)
of the catalyst after 5-round usage shows no obvious change
in morphology or aggregation of the Cu
2
O nanoparticles. The
mean diameter of the Cu O particles is still about 8 nm. The
2
Fig. 1 TEM images (A, B), XRD pattern (C) and XPS profile (D) of the
wt.% Cu O/graphene catalyst, and the size distribution of Cu
above results indicate that the Cu O/graphene catalyst has
5
2
2
O
2
nanoparticles (inset of A).
excellent catalytic stability in the reaction.
Catal. Sci. Technol.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014