3
Structure of Bromotrinitrosyl Iron, [Fe(NO) Br]
the FeϪN bond length and also for the FeϪNϪO,
NϪFeϪN and NϪFeϪX bond angles. The calculated ν˜ NO
wavenumbers are by ϳ100 cm higher than the experimen-
tal values and agree well if a linear scaling factor of 0.95
is applied.
B3LYP level of theory, using Becke’s three parameter functional
where the local and non-local correlation is provided by the LYP
(the correlation functional of Lee, Yang, Parr) expression [19Ϫ21].
For N, O and Cl a polarized valence triple-zeta basis set of the type
Ϫ1
6-311G(2df) was used.
For iron, bromine and iodine energy-consistent pseudopotentials
were used [22]. The energy-consistent pseudopotentials of the
Stuttgart/Cologne group are semi-local pseudopotentials adjusted
to reproduce atomic valence-energy spectra. The adjustment of the
pseudopotential parameters has been done in fully numerical calcu-
lations, valence basis sets have been generated a-posteriori via en-
ergy optimization. In this study we used quasirelativistic multielec-
tron-fit Wood-Boring (MWB) pseudopotentials for bromine
Experimental Section
3 2 3
[Fe(NO) Br] from FeBr /Fe and NO [Fe(NO) Br] was synthesized
using the apparatus described earlier [5, 15]. A slow stream of puri-
fied (using 50 % KOH solution and solid NaOH) nitrogen monox-
ide (Aldrich) was passed through a glass tube over a ceramic con-
2
tainer with a mixture of ϳ 2g anhydrous, sublimed FeBr and
excess Fe powder (Aldrich). The electric oven was heated to
ϳ150 °C and then allowed to cool down to ϳ100 °C within 3 h.
Black fine needles sublimed to the colder part of the tube which
were collected under NO atmosphere and immediately used for
X-ray structure determination and IR spectra.
(
ECP28MWB) [23] and iodine (ECP46MWB) [23] and a relativistic
multielectron-fit Dirac-Fock (MDF) potential for iron
ECP10MDF) [24].
(
The bromine (7), iodine (7) and iron (16) valence electrons were
treated with valence basis sets of the following contraction: Br,
(14s10p2d1f)/[3s3p2d1f]; [25]; I,(14s10p3d1f)/[3s3p2d1f] [8]; Fe,
IR spectra (Perkin Elmer Spectrum One, CH
899 w ([Fe(NO) Br]); 1766 w, 1817 w ([Fe (NO)
cm (decomposition product?).
2
Cl
2
): νNO ϭ 1794 vs,
1
3
2
4
Br ]); 1735 w-m,
2
Ϫ1
(
8s7p6d1f)/[6s5p3d1f] [24].
[
Fe(NO) Br] from [Fe(CO) Br ] and NO (see [4])
Acknowledgements. We are grateful to the Ludwig-Maximilian
University Munich and to Wacker-Chemie, München for support.
We thank Dr. Armin Enzmann and Gunnar Spiess for valuable help.
3
4
2
A slow stream of purified NO (from NaNO
Kipp apparatus was passed over a vessel with a mixture of ϳ1 g
Fe(CO) Br ] [16] and excess iron powder (from Fe(CO) ) in a glass
2 2 4
and 50 % H SO in a
[
4
2
5
tube which was heated to 60 °C. NO is consumed. If the heating is
made to quickly, sudden reaction with glowing of the solid may
occur. When the consumption of NO is finished the temperature is
raised to 115 °C. After 6 h bright, 1Ϫ2 cm long, black needles were
sublimed to the colder part of the tube in a slow stream of NO.
References
[
[
[
1] W. Beck, A. Enzmann, P. Mayer, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2004,
631, 105.
3
[Fe(NO) Br] (225.79) Calc.
2] T. W. Hayton, W. S. McNeil, B. O. Patrick, P. Legzdins, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12935.
3] Herbert Fischer, PhD thesis, 1937, Technische Hochschule
München “Zur Kenntnis der Eisennitrosyl-Verbindungen”
Fe 24.74, Br 35.40, Found Fe 25.2, Br 35.6 %.
[
Fe(NO) Cl] from [Fe(CO) Cl ] and NO
3 4 2
(
under the supervision of W. Manchot).
As described above for [Fe(CO)
and Fe powder treated with NO affords the complex [Fe(NO)
in an exothermic reaction.
4
Br
2
]/Fe a mixture of [Fe(CO)
4
Cl
2
]
[4] W. Hieber, W. Beck, Z. Naturforsch. 1958, 13b, 194.
[5] W. Hieber, R. Nast, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1940, 244, 23.
[6] L. F. Dahl, E. R. de Gie, R. D. Feltham, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1969, 91, 1653; R. H. Summerville, R. Hoffmann, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 7240.
3
Cl]
3
[Fe(NO) Cl] (181.32) Calc.19.56, Found Cl 19.73 %.
[7] H. Soling, R. W. Asmussen, Acta Chem. Scand. 1957, 11, 1534.
X-ray Structure Determination of [Fe(NO) Br]
[8] B. Haymore, R. D. Feltham, Inorg. Synth. 1973, 14, 81; P. L.
Maxfield, Inorg .Nucl. Chem. Letters 1970, 6, 709; D. Huchette,
B. Thery, F. Petit, J. Mol. Catal. 1978, 4, 433.
3
The data in table 2 were collected on a NONIUS KAPPA CCD
with a rotating anode using Mo-K radiation. The structure was
α
[9] W. Beck, H. G. Fick, K. Lottes, K. H. Schmidtner, Z. Anorg.
solved with direct methods by applying the program SIR 97 [17];
for the refinement the program SHELX 97 was used.
Allg. Chem. 1975, 416, 99.
10] W. Beck, A. Melnikoff, R. Stahl, Chem. Ber. 1966, 99, 3721;
[
J. G. Bullitt, F. A. Cotton, Inorg. Chim. Acta 1971, 5, 637; F.
A. Cotton, G. Wilkinson, Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 5
Ed., Wiley, New York 1988, 1036.
Further details on the crystal structure investigation may be ob-
tained from the Fachinformationszentrum Karslruhe, 76344
Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (fax: (ϩ49) 7247-808-606;
e-mail: crysdata@fiz-karlsruhe.de), on quoting the depository num-
ber CSD 416028
th
[
[
11] W. Beck, K. Lottes, Chem. Ber. 1965, 98, 2672.
12] W. Hieber, R. Kramolowsky, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1963,
3
21, 94.
13] R. H. Summerville, R. Hoffmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976,
8, 7251.
[
[
9
Methods
14] F. L. Alkinson, H. E. Blackwell, N. C. Brown, N. C. Connelly,
J. G. Crossley, A. G. Orpen, A. L. Rieger, P. W. Rieger, J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1996, 3491 and references therein.
All calculations were carried out using the Gaussian G03W (re-
vision B.03) program package [18]. The structures and analytical
frequencies were computed at the hybrid density functional (DFT)
[15] W. Hieber, R. Marin, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1939, 240, 247.
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2006, 417Ϫ420
2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim zaac.wiley-vch.de 419