G Model
CCLET 4654 No. of Pages 5
L. Zhang et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2018) xxx–xxx
3
Table 1
Optimization for reaction conditions of intermediate 4.
Entry
Base
2:Aa:Bb(mol)
Temp. (ꢁC)
Time (h)
Conversion rate (%)
Yield (%)c
3
4
C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Piperidine
DABCO
Et3N
DIPEA
Diethylamine
Pyrrole
Piperazine
Morpholine
NMM
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:3.0:2.5
1.0:2.5:2.5
1.0:4.0:2.5
1.0:5.0:2.5
1.0:6.0:2.5
1.0:4.0:2.5
1.0:4.0:2.5
1.0:4.0:2.5
1.0:4.0:2.5
1.0:4.0:2.5
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
25
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
96
41
64
41
41
>99.9
98.4
98.8
96.2
99.8
>99.9
99.5
>99.9
93.3
>99.9
98.3
98.0
87.4
62.5
62.8
82.0
80.7
73.1
55.0
58.9
52.2
trace
22.3
23.2
16.0
64.5
69.4
36.4
3.2
12.3
78.4
20.0
15.4
9.7
trace
3.6
4.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21.2
8.3
6.2
6.0
9.5
20.4
24.2
13.2
52.3
19.0
24.2
24.4
6.5
9
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
DBU
DBN
20.7
11.3
7.4
0
Imidazole
Na2CO3
KHCO3
K2CO3
Cs2CO3
NaHCO3
DBU
DBU
DBU
DBU
DBU
83.1
77.1
18.1
0
11.4
13.0
4.5
14.3
8.2
6.1
0
22.5
21.7
18.3
52.0
50.3
34.1
36.1
25.7
74.3
>99.9
96.7
96.4
92.4
66.2
83.2
93.3
87.3
11.8
12.4
20.2
20.9
20.0
trace
11.6
11.5
16.2
20.0
DBU
DBU
DBU
DBU
50
50
60
70
4.1
12.3
96.9
a
2-Aminoacetic acid methyl ester hydrochloride.
Base.
Yield was determined by the analysis of HPLC.
b
c
that it was important to choose mild room temperature while
extended the reaction time to improve the selectivity (entries 23–
27). After the optimization, 4 could be given with high selectivity
despite of the decreased conversion rate. In summary, when
compound 2 was treated with A (4.0 equiv.) and DBU (2.5 equiv.)
(entry 23) in MeCN at room temperature for 96 h, the reaction
proceeded effectively, affording 4 in 52%.
Target products 5aꢀs, 6aꢀe were synthesized from compound 4
and acyl chloride (Scheme 2). For substituted phenyl amide,
different substituents were introduced into phenyl ring including
halogen, methyl, methoxyl, cyano, trifluoromethoxyl and so on. The
spectrum data of representative compound 4 and 6a were given as
follows.
DMSO-d6): d 168.5, 156.1, 151.7, 149.0, 146.6, 138.7, 129.7, 124.8,
120.5, 119.3, 115.0, 52.5, 50.2, 43.1, 24.5; HRMS (EI+) calcd. for
C
C
15H1435ClN5O4 (M)+: 363.0734; Found: 363.0730; Calcd. for
15H1437ClN5O4 (M)+: 365.0705; Found: 365.0729.
Bioassays were performed on representative test organisms
grown in the laboratory. The insecticidal activities of the synthetic
compounds against Tetranychus cinnabarinus, Aphis craccivora,
Prodenia litura and Nilaparvata lugens were tested according to our
previous reported procedure [26–28], and detailed procedures are
given in the Supporting information.
TheresultsofbioassayaredepictedinTable 2, precursorcompound4
showed100% mortalityagainstA.craccivoraandN.lugensat500 mg/
L. Compounds 5aꢀs, 6aꢀe were the derivatives of compound 4. No
substituent (5a), moderate electron-donating and electron-with-
drawing (5c, 5g, 5h) had good activity against A. craccivora and N.
lugens. However, electron-withdrawing Cl group (5b) and strong
electron-donating (5d, 5e), showed low activity. Meanwhile, when
introducing disubstituted and polysubstituted groups into benzene
ringexcept5i, 5l, 5m, 5n, 5o, 5p, 5q, the othercompounds exhibited
the insecticidal activity. For aliphatic amide, derived alkyl groups
(6a, 6b, 6e) exhibited 90%–100% mortality against A. craccivora and
N. lugens. Compounds 5f, 5s and 6a showed 95% mortality against T.
cinnabarinus. Among them, only 6a still kept the activity against A.
craccivora and N. lugens, besides T. cinnabarinus.
6-Amino-1-((6-chloropyridin-3-yl)methyl)-8-nitro-2,3-dihy-
droimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-5(1H)-one (4). Red powder, yield 49.3%;
IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3436, 3337, 1671, 1630, 1574, 1449, 1396, 1332,1274,
1236, 1203; Mp 181.9–182.4 ꢁC; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
8.40 (d, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 7.86 (dd, 1H, J1 = 2.4 Hz, J2 = 8.4 Hz), 7.52 (d,
1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.03 (s, 1 H), 4.91 (s, 2H), 4.70 (s, 2H), 4.13–3.83 (m,
4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d 157.0, 149.6, 149.4, 146.6,
139.4, 132.6, 129.9, 124.5, 114.7, 106.7, 52.6, 51.2, 43.7; HRMS (ESI+)
calcd. for C13H12ClN5O3 (M + Na)+: 344.0526; Found: 344.0521.
N-(1-((6-Chloropyridin-3-yl)methyl)-8-nitro-5-oxo-1,2,3,5-
tetrahydroimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-6-yl)acetamide (6a). Yellow
powder, yield 93.0%; IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3481, 1651, 1619, 1526,
1466, 1400, 1320, 1284; Mp 220.7–222.0 ꢁC; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
Furthermore, the compounds with 100% mortality at 500 mg/L
compounds4,5a,5c,5g,5h,5j,5r,6b,6ewereselectedtoinvestigate
their activity at lower concentration. As shown in Table 3, the result
was undesirable, most compounds almost completely lost the
DMSO-d6):
d 8.97 (s, 1H), 8.38 (s, 1H), 7.81-7.77 (m, 2H), 7.37 (d, 1H,
J = 8.0 Hz), 4.74 (s, 2H), 4.27–3.82 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
Please cite this article in press as: L. Zhang, et al., Synthesis and insecticidal bioactivities of 2,3-dihydroimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-5(1H)-one