a result, N,N′-disubstituted cyclic ureas are often prepared
by deprotonation and alkylation of their unsubstituted
analogues.11
Catalytic oxidative carbonylation of diamine substrates
would provide an alternative route to cyclic ureas in which
CO could be used as the carbonyl source. Oxidative
carbonylation of primary amines to acyclic ureas has been
report the catalytic oxidative carbonylation of R,ω-diamines
to cyclic ureas. Both primary and secondary diamines are
substrates for the reaction, with secondary diamines being
converted directly to the corresponding N,N′-disubstituted
cyclic ureas. To our knowledge, this simple procedure is the
first example of a transition metal-catalyzed method to
convert both primary and secondary diamines to cyclic ureas
using carbon monoxide as the carbonyl source.
1
2
13
14
reported to be catalyzed by complexes of Ni, Co, W,
15
16
17
Mn, Ru, and Pd. However, the transition metal-catalyzed
reactions generally require high temperatures and pressures,
and yields tend to be much lower for aliphatic amines than
When the primary diamines H
0-2) were reacted with CO (100 atm) in the presence of
catalytic amounts of W(CO) and nearly stoichiometric I
2 2 2 n 2 2
NCH (CH ) CH NH (n )
6
2
,
1
8
for aromatic ones. Main group elements such as sulfur and
the diamines were converted to the corresponding cyclic
selenium19 can also serve as catalysts.
22
ureas (eq 1). Note that the reactions were run at room
The formation of cyclic ureas by catalytic carbonylation
has been much less well explored than the acyclic cases.
Catalytic carbonylation of diamines with carbon monoxide
to form cyclic ureas in high yields has been reported to
proceed in the presence of elemental selenium; however, the
reaction generates hydrogen selenide as a byproduct and
certain substrates such as 2-(2-aminoethylaniline) only form
the cyclic urea in the presence of stoichiometric or excess
temperature, in contrast to the 100-200 °C ranges that are
typical for catalytic oxidative carbonylation. The yields are
1
9
selenium. Prior reports of transition metal-catalyzed car-
bonylation of diamines cite cyclic ureas only as very minor
significantly improved by addition of excess K
2 3
CO to
scavenge the byproduct HI. Because the competitive forma-
or side products. As an example, Mn
carbonylation of the diamines H N(CH NH
) yielded no cyclic products when n ) 2, 4, or 6 and only
2
(CO)10-catalyzed
1
7c
tion of oligomers is favored by high concentrations of
diamine, it was necessary to employ high dilution conditions.
The results for a series of primary diamines are shown in
Table 1. Preparation of the five-, six-, and seven-membered
cyclic ureas was achieved in moderate to good yields. The
highest isolated yield was obtained for the six-membered
cyclic urea, while only trace amounts of the eight-membered
2
)
2 n
2
(n ) 2-4 and
6
6
% of the six-membered urea when n ) 3.1 Carbonylation
5b
of ethylenediamine catalyzed by Ni(CO)
4
yielded 2-imida-
20
zolidinone as a minor product in 10% yield. In addition to
the catalytic cases involving CO, there is also a report of
carbonylation of both primary and secondary diamines to
cyclic ureas in moderate to good yields using CO
carbonyl source and Ph SbO/P
10 as catalyst.21
We recently reported the catalytic oxidative carbonylation
2 2
of primary amines to ureas using either [(CO) W(NPh)I ]
2
as the
3
4
S
Table 1. Catalytic Carbonylation of Primary R,ω-Diamines to
Cyclic Ureas
2
6 2
or W(CO) as the catalyst and I
as the oxidant.1 We now
4b
(11) See, for example: Nugiel, D. A.; Jacobs, K.; Worley, T.; Patel,
M.; Kaltenbach, R. F.; Meyer, D. T.; Jadhav, P. K.; DeLucca, G. V.; Smyser,
T. E.; Klabe, R. M.; Bacheler, L. T.; Rayner, M. M.; Seitz, S. P. J. Med.
Chem. 1996, 39, 2156-2169.
(12) Giannocaro, P.; Nobile, C. F.; Mastrorilli, P.; Ravasio, N. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1991, 419, 251-258.
13) Bassoli, A.; Rindone, B.; Tollari, S.; Chioccara, F. J. Mol. Catal.
990, 60, 41-48.
14) (a) McCusker, J. E.; Abboud, K. A.; McElwee-White, L. Organo-
(
1
(
metallics 1997, 16, 3863-3866. (b) McCusker, J. E.; Logan, J.; McElwee-
White, L. Organometallics 1998, 17, 4037-4041.
(
15) (a) Calderazzo, F. Inorg. Chem. 1965, 4, 293-296. (b) Dombek,
B. D.; Angelici, R. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1977, 134, 203-217.
16) Mulla, S. A. R.; Rode, C. V.; Kelkar, A. A.; Gupte, S. P. J. Mol.
Catal. A. 1997, 122, 103-109.
(
(
17) (a) Pri-Bar, I.; Alper, H. Can. J. Chem. 1990, 68, 1544-1547. (b)
Gupte, S. P.; Chaudhari, R. V. J. Catalysis 1988, 114, 246-258. (c) Dahlen,
G. M.; Sen, A. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 1784-1786.
(18) (a) Franz, R. A.; Applegath, F.; Morriss, F. V.; Baiocchi, F.; Bolze,
C. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 3309-3312. (b) Franz, R. A.; Applegath, F.;
Morriss, F. V.; Baiocchi, F. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 3306-3308. (c) Franz,
R. A.; Applegath, F.; J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 3304-3305.
(19) (a) Sonoda, N.; Yasuhara, T.; Kondo, K.; Ikeda, T.; Tsutsumi, S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 6344. (b) Yoshida, T.; Kambe, N.; Murai, S.;
Sonoda, N. Bull. Soc. Chem. Jpn. 1987, 60, 1793-1799. (c) Yoshida, T.;
Kambe, N.; Murai, S.; Sonoda, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 3037-3040.
(
20) Martin, W. E.; Farona, M. F. J. Organomet. Chem. 1981, 206, 393-
3
97.
21) Nomura, R.; Hasegawa, Y.; Ishimoto, M.; Toyosaki, T.; Matsuda,
H. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 7339-7342.
a
(
Isolated yield per equivalent of starting diamine.
962
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 7, 1999