Mendeleev Commun., 2012, 22, 267–269
Table 1 Synthesis of 3,4-dihydroisoquinolines 2a–c,e–h by the Bishler–
None of the amides 1a–h reacted properly in [bmim][HSO4]
as the IL. Luckily, triflate ILs such as [emim][CF3SO3] and
[bmpyrr][CF3SO3] proved to be efficient reaction media for the
preparation of 3,4-dihydroisoquinoline 2c (2.5 molar excess of
POCl3, entries 7,8). These ILs were also good to prepare 3,4-di-
hydroisoquinolines 2a,b (entries 2,3,5,6). Amide 1d did not
produce 3,4-dihydroisoquinoline 2d in any tested ILs even by
heating at 95–100°C for 40 h. Raising the temperature to 130°C
resulted in the splitting of the amide bond.
Napieralski reaction of N-acyl-2-arylethylamines 1a–c,e–h (1 mmol) with
POCl3 in ILs at 95–100°C.
Initial POCl3/
amide mmol
Yield
of 2 (%) POCl3 (%)
Yield with
Entry
IL
t/h
1
1*
2
1a
1a
1a
1a
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
[bmim][PF6]
1
1
3
3
2a (85)
2a (84)
2a (90)
2a (88)
[bmim][PF6] (regen.)
[emim][CF3SO3]
[bmpyrr][CF3SO3]
74–8023,24,b
3
Similar results were obtained for the Bishler–Napieralski reac-
tion of N-benzoyl-2-arylethylamines 1e–h. Amides 1e and 1f
with MeO activating groups were converted into 3,4-dihydro-
isoquinolines 2e and 2f in [bmim][PF6] in high yields. However,
POCl3:amide molar ratio of 9:1 (Table 1, entries 9,11) and a longer
reaction time for 1f were required. Close results were obtained in
case of [emim][CF3SO3] (entries 10, 12). Conversion of 1f to 2f
proceeds faster in triflate ILs than in [bmim][PF6]. Triflate ILs,
[emim][CF3SO3] and [bmpyrr][CF3SO3], also favoured prepara-
tion of 3,4-dihydroisoquinolines 2g from amide 1g (reaction time
1–2.5 h, entries 13,14). The cyclization of N-benzoyl-2-(4-chloro-
phenyl)ethylamine 1h in triflate ILs was never complete even
within 44 h. However, raising the temperature to 130°C and
POCl3:amide molar ratio to 9:1 in [bmim][PF6] afforded the target
2h in 65% yield (entry 15). The IL [bmim][PF6] was regenerated
and reused in the same reactions without a remarkable drop in the
yield of the product (see entries 1*, 15*).
4
5
6
1b
1b
1b
2.5
2.5
2.5
[bmim][PF6]
[emim][CF3SO3]
[bmpyrr][CF3SO3]
5
6
2b (86)
2b (90) 3612,c
18 2b (82)
7
8
1c
1c
2.5
2.5
[emim][CF3SO3]
[bmpyrr][CF3SO3]
1
1
2c (93)
2c (94)
3512,c, 7525,d
>9027,e
6528,f
9
10
1e
1e
9.0
9.0
[bmim][PF6]
[emim][CF3SO3]
1
2e (83)
12 2e (85)
11
12
1f
1f
9.0
9.0
[bmim][PF6]
[emim][CF3SO3]
18 2f (80)
8
2f (78)
13
14
1g
1g
9.0
9.0
[emim][CF3SO3]
[bmpyrr][CF3SO3]
2.5 2g (75)
1
10a 2h (65)
9028,f
2g (81)
15
15* 1h
1h
9.0
9.0
[bmim][PF6]
[bmim][PF6] (regen.) 10a 2h (63)
5429,g
a Temperature 130°C. b POCl3, refluxing in toluene for 3 h. c POCl3 + P2O5,
refluxing in toluene for 3 h. d POCl3 + P2O5 in toluene, microwave irradiation
for 6 min. ePOCl3, refluxing in MeCN for 2 h. f POCl3 + P2O5, refluxing in
xylene for 4 h. g POCl3 + P2O5, refluxing in xylene for 6 h.
The anion of IL has a significant effect on its catalytic
activity.18,19 However, such studies were carried out only for an
optimization of scarce reactions. Both reported data20,21 and our
previous results4 confirm that ILs are substrate-specific solvents.
The general principles for selection of ILs for different reactions
are absent. Nevertheless, a high acidic-catalytic activity of triflate
ILs was indicated earlier. A series of pyridinium ILs with dif-
ferent anions was investigated for acid-catalysed transesterifica-
tion of Jatropha oil,22 when triflate IL showed the best catalytic
activity. Evidently, our success in the synthesis of 3,4-dihydro-
isoquinolines 2c,g with non-activated aromatic ring can be
rationalized in view of acid-catalytic activity of triflates used.
According to literature data12,23–28 preparation of 3,4-dihydro-
isoquinolines 2 from the corresponding N-acyl-2-arylethyl-
amines 1 in conventional organic solvent with POCl3 as dehydrat-
ing reagent required higher temperature and application of P2O5
additive, whereas the yields of products were usually lower.
In summary, the results obtained in this work exemplifying
the Bishler–Napieralski synthesis of 3,4-dihydroisoquinolines 2
demonstrate the preparative and environmental advantages of
ILs as reaction media and catalysts as compared to conventional
organic solvents.
General procedure for the preparation of 3,4-dihydroisoquinolines 2
in ILs. A mixture of N-acyl-2-arylethylamine 1 (1 mmol), POCl3 (2.5 or
9 mmol) and 2 g of the corresponding IL (Table 1) was heated with a
backflow condenser and protection from moisture at 95–100°C at stirring
until the full consumption of 1 (TLC control). Then the reaction mixture
was cooled to 20°C, diluted with water (3 ml) and NaOH aqueous solu-
tion was added dropwise to pH 10. The liberated 3,4-dihydroisoquinoline
was extracted with diethyl ether (5×3 ml), the ether solution was washed
with water (2×3 ml), dried with MgSO4 and the solvent was evaporated.
The residue was purified by flash chromatography through a short column
with SiO2 or by crystallization.
General procedure for the preparation of 3,4-dihydroisoquinolines 2
with [bmim][PF6] regeneration. To regenerate IL [bmim][PF6] after the
reaction completion, a POCl3 excess was pumped off, 3 ml water was
added, an IL layer was separated, washed with 2 ml water, dried in a vacuum
dessicator over P2O5 and reused in a similar reaction. NaOH aqueous
solution was added to the combined aqueous fraction to achieve pH 10 and
corresponding 3,4-dihydroisoquinoline was isolated as described above.
6,7-Dimethoxy-1-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline 2a: mp 100–102°C
(lit.,29 mp 101–103°C).
This work was supported by Merck KGaA and the Russian
Academy of Sciences.
7-Methoxy-1-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline 2b: yellow oil. IR (n/cm–1):
997, 2938, 2837, 1630, 1609, 1573, 1513, 1496, 1462, 1431, 1372, 1312,
1295, 1245, 1218, 1180, 1082, 1063, 873, 821, 751, 699, 635. 1H NMR
References
3
1 (a) N. N. Makhova, A. V. Shevtsov and V. Yu. Petukhova, Usp. Khim.,
2011, 80, 1087 (Russ. Chem. Rev., 2011, 80, 1035); (b) S. G. Zlotin and
N. N. Makhova, Usp. Khim., 2010, 79, 603 (Russ. Chem. Rev., 2010, 79,
543).
2 I. V. Seregin, L. V. Batog and N. N. Makhova, Mendeleev Commun.,
2002, 83.
3 M. A. Epishina, A. S. Kulikov, N. V. Ignat’ev, M. Schulte and N. N.
Makhova, Mendeleev Commun., 2011, 21, 334.
4 S. G. Zlotin and N. N. Makhova, Mendeleev Commun., 2010, 20, 63.
5 Yu. S. Syroeshkina, V. V. Kuznetsov, V. V. Kachala and N. N. Makhova,
J. Heterocycl. Chem., 2009, 46, 1195.
(CDCl3) d: 2.35 (s, 3H, MeC=N), 2.62 (t, 2H, NCH2CH2, J 7.3 Hz),
3.65 (t, 2H, NCH2CH2, 3J 7.3 Hz), 3.84 (s, 3H, MeO), 6.70 (s, 1H, HAr),
6.85, 7.28 (2d, 2×1H, HAr). 13C NMR (CDCl3) d: 23.00 (MeC=N), 24.99
(NCH2CH2), 47.01 (NCH2CH2), 111.36, 113.84, 115.62, 128.06, 129.28,
129.63, 164.25 (MeC=N). MS, m/z: 175 [M+] (100), 160 [M+ – Me] (12),
144 [M+ – MeO] (29), 131 (24), 121 (24).
1-Methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline 2c: bp 104–107°C (11 Torr) [lit.,30
110–116°C (12 Torr)]. Spectral data are identical to reported in refs. 30,31.
6,7-Dimethoxy-1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline 2e: mp 121–122°C
(lit.,32 120–121°C). Spectral data are identical to reported in ref. 26.
7-Methoxy-1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline 2f: crystallized oil, spectral
data are identical to reported in ref. 33.
6 M. A. Epishina, I. V. Ovchinnikov, A. S. Kulikov, N. N. Makhova and
V. A. Tartakovsky, Mendeleev Commun., 2011, 21, 21.
7 M. A. Epishina, A. S. Kulikov, N. V. Ignat’ev, M. Schulte and N. N.
Makhova, Mendeleev Commun., 2011, 21, 331.
1-Phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline 2g: bp 165–170°C (4 Torr) [lit.,29
150–160°C (2–3 Torr)], spectral data are identical to reported in ref. 34.
7-Chloro-1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline 2h: mp 145–146°C, spectral
data are identical to reported in ref. 28.
8 M. A. Epishina, A. S. Kulikov, N. V. Ignat’ev, M. Schulte and N. N.
Makhova, Mendeleev Commun., 2010, 20, 335.
– 268 –