COMMUNICATION
Scheme 1
Figure 1. ORTEP diagram of 2. Ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability.
For the sake of clarity, the H atoms were omitted.
to low field with respect to 1. Powder magnetism measure-
ments of 2 between 2 and 300 K (Figure S3 of the Supporting
Information) showed that the values and the shape of the
curve are as expected for isolated octahedral CoII ions with
some trigonal distortions.7 Crystals good enough for X-ray
diffraction were obtained by slow evaporation from an
acetone solution of 2.8 A perspective drawing of its crystal
structure with atom numbering is depicted in Figure 1. The
coordination polyhedron around the Ru atom adopts a highly
distorted pseudooctahedral geometry [P1-Ru1-P2 )
99.04(11)°], similar to that observed for piano-stool com-
plexes of the type [RuCpX(L)(L′)]n+,9 such as 1, recently
published by us.3
as a regulating agent for radical polymerization of poly(vinyl
acetate).4
The reaction of 1 with Co(acac)2 in methanol5 led to the
new bimetallic complex [RuClCp(PPh3)-µ-dmoPTA-1κP:
2κ2N,N′-Co(acac-κ2O,O′)2] · H2O (2), which was first char-
acterized by elemental analysis, IR (Figure S1 of the
Supporting Information), and NMR spectroscopy. The
31P{1H} NMR spectrum in CD3OD is constituted by two
doublets at 52.71 and 51.56 ppm (2JPP ) 41.6 Hz), which
had arisen to a field lower than those found in starting
complex 1 [δ(PPh3) ) 46.00 ppm; δ(HdmoPTA) ) -2.93
ppm], while the coupling constant is practically the same
(2JPP ) 42.72 Hz). That effect could be justified by
considering CoII bonded to dmoPTA through both CH3-N
atoms. As expected, the CoII paramagnetic influence on
dmoPTA [∆δ (2-dmoPTA - 1-HdmoPTA ) -54.49
ppm] is bigger than that on the PPh3 [∆δ (2-PPh3 - 1-PPh3
No significant differences were found in the rest of the
bond distances and angles from those found in similar
cyclopentadienyl RuII complexes.3,9 The monodentate
{RuClCp(PPh3)(dmoPTA-1κP)} entity acts as a bidentate
ligand by its CH3-N atoms toward a CoII atom, which
6
1
) 6.71 ppm]. Similarly, its H and 31C{1H} NMR could
(7) Magnetic susceptibility measurements on polycrystalline samples were
carried out in the temperature range 1.9-300 K by means of a
Quantum Design SQUID magnetometer operating at 10 000 Oe.
Diamagnetic corrections of the constituent atoms were estimated from
Pascal’s constants. Experimental susceptibilities were also corrected
for the magnetization of the sample holder.
only be justified by the CoII paramagnetic effect. An
indubitable assignation of the H NMR signals was not
1
possible (Figure S2 of the Supporting Information), while
the 13C{1H} NMR signals for PPh3 (127.8–136.22 ppm) and
Cp (88.24 ppm) were the only ones clearly assigned. It is
interesting to point out that the Cp signal is shifted 8.9 ppm
(8) The structure was determined by direct methods and refined by least-
squares procedures on F2. (a) Altamore, A.; Cascarano, G.; Giaco-
vazzo, C.; Guagliardi, A.; Moliterni, G.; Burla, M. C.; Polidori, G.;
Camalli, M.; Spagna, R. Sir 97 Package Program; 1997. (b) Sheldrick,
G. M. SHELXL, version 6.14; Bruker-AXS: Madison, WI, 2003.
Crystallographic data were collected at 293(2) K on a Bruker APEX
CCD diffractometer (XDIFRACT service of the University of Almería)
with Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.710 69 Å). Crystal data for 2 (CCDC
667604): 0.07 × 0.05 × 0.04 mm3, monoclinic P21/c, Z ) 4, a )
12.154(5) Å, b ) 35.492(5) Å, c ) 9.884(5) Å, R ) 90°, V ) 4082(3)
Å3, -14 e h e 13, -35 e k e 41, -11 e l e 11. Of the 6733
measured independent reflections in the θ range 1.75–24.44°, 3414
have I0 > 2σ(I0), R1 ) 0.0810, wR2 ) 0.1468. The function
(4) (a) For example, see: Reeve, T. B.; Cros, J. P.; Gennari, C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2449. (b) Dickie, D. A.; Schatte, G.; Jennings,
M. C. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 1646. (c) Levitin, I. Y.; Yatsimirsky,
A. K.; Volpin, M. E. Organomet. Chem. U.S.S.R. 1990, 3, 442. (d)
Debuigne, A.; Caille, J.-R.; Jéróme, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005,
44, 1101. (e) Rivera, E. F.; Atakan, B.; Kohse-Hoinghaus, K. J. Phys.
IV 2001, 11, Pr3–629. (f) Granquist, C. G. Handbook of Inorganic
Electrochromic Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
1995.
2
(5) Co(acac)2 (0.0858 g, 0.33 mmol) was introduced into a solution of 1
(0.075 g, 0.0095 mmol) in 6 mL of MeOH. The mixture was first
stirred at room temperature until dissolution of the reactants was
completed and then refluxed for 3.5 h. The solvent was removed until
0.5 mL, and then 5 mL of pentane was added. The obtained pale-
brown precipitated was filtered and washed with water (2 × 5 mL).
The wet powder was recrystallized in EtOH. Yield: 47.7 mg (∼ 55%).
minimized during the refinement was w ) 1/[σ2(Fo ) + (0.0631P)2 +
2
0.0000P], where P ) [(max(Fo ) + 2Fc2)/3]. The H atoms were refined
with isotropic temperature factors. The final Fourier difference maps
showed maximum and minimum height peaks of 1.067 and -0.952
e/Å3.
(9) (a) Romerosa, A.; Campos-Malpartida, T.; Lidrissi, C.; Saoud, M.;
Serrano-Ruiz, M.; Peruzzini, M.; Garrido-Cárdenas, J. A.; García-
Maroto, F. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 46, 1289. (b) Lidrissi, C.; Romerosa,
A.; Saoud, M.; Serrano-Ruiz, M.; Gonsalvi, L.; Peruzzini, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2568. (c) Romerosa, A.; Saoud, M.; Campos-
Malpartida, T.; Lidrissi, C.; Serrano-Ruiz, M.; Peruzzini, M.; Garrido-
Cárdenas, J. A.; García-Maroto, F. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 2803.
(d) Akbayeva, D. N.; Gonsalvi, L.; Oberhauser, W.; Peruzzini, M.;
Vizza, F.; Brüggeller, P.; Romerosa, A.; Sava, G.; Bergamo, A. Chem.
Commun. 2003, 264. (e) Bolaño, S.; Gonsalvi, L.; Zanobini, F.; Vizza,
F.; Bertolasi, V.; Romerosa, A.; Peruzzini, M. J. Mol. Catal. A 2004,
224, 61.
S25°C,H O < 1 mg/mL. Elem anal. Calcd for C40H52N3ClO5P2RuCo
2
(MW ) 912.25 g/mol): C, 52.66; H, 5.70; N, 4.60. Found: C, 52.42;
H, 5.81; N, 4.47. 13C{1H} NMR (CD3OD): δ (ppm) 88.24 (s, Cp),
127.8–136.22 (m, aromatic, PPh3). 31P{1H} NMR (CD3OD): δ (ppm)
52.71 (d, 2JPP ) 41.6 Hz, PPh3), 51.56 (dd, 2JPP ) 41.6 Hz, dmoPTA).
(6) (a) Bertini, I.; Turano, P.; Vila, A. J. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 2833. (b)
Bonadies, J. A.; Kirk, M. L.; Lah, M. S.; Kessissoglou, D. P.; Hatfield,
W. E.; Pecoraro, V. L. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 2037. (c) Bertini, I.;
Luchinat, C. NMR of Paramagnetic Molecules in Biological Systems;
Benjamin-Cumming Publishing Co.: Menlo Park, CA, 1986.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 47, No. 7, 2008 2247