C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
via binding to an accessory binding site located near the catalytic
site of IDO.14 To investigate if the IDE binding site coincides with
the aforementioned Si site, we examined the hIDO activity in the
presence of 2.5 and 5.1 mM IDE. As shown in Figure 2a, the
presence of IDE led to higher activity and less pronounced substrate
inhibition. The best fit of data with eq 1 indicates IDE does not
affect kcat and Km but causes the elevation of Ksi from 0.17 to 0.48/
1.0 mM (for 2.5/5.1 mM IDE, see Table 1), indicating IDE
competes with L-Trp for the Si site. As IDE bound to the Si site,
unlike L-Trp, does not retard the active site catalysis, the apparent
activity is higher than that in its absence. The data clearly
demonstrate that IDE acts as an effector by binding to the Si site,
thereby blocking it from L-Trp binding, instead of by facilitating
kcat, as generally believed.
MtoC, a quinone-containing natural product from Streptomyces,
has been widely used as a chemotherapy drug for several types of
cancer.15 It is believed that the antitumor activity of MtoC is a
result of its ability to generate oxygen radicals upon reduction,
thereby inhibiting DNA synthesis. The recent findings that hIDO
is a potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment and that quinone
is a potent pharmacophore for hIDO inhibition16-18 prompted us
to investigate if hIDO could function as a pharmacological target
of MtoC. We examined the hIDO activity as a function of MtoC
concentration. The Lineweaver-Burk plot of the data (Figure 2b)
shows MtoC indeed inhibits hIDO in an uncompetitive fashion with
an inhibition constant (Ki) of ∼25 µM. The data indicate that, as
an uncompetitive inhibitor, MtoC binds only to the L-Trp-bound
enzyme, not the substrate-free enzyme. We propose that L-Trp
binding in the active site induces structural changes to the Si site
to accommodate the MtoC molecule and that the occupancy of the
Si site by MtoC inhibits the active site catalysis.
Figure 2. Michaelis-Menten plots of the hIDO reaction at pH 7.4, in the
absence or presence 2.5 or 5.1 mM IDE (a) and the Lineweaver-Burk
plots of the steady-state activities of hIDO in the presence of various
concentrations of MtoC (b) and L-1MTrp (c).
Recently, hIDO has emerged as a therapeutic target for cancer,4
leading to an active search for potent inhibitors. Our data show
MtoC effectively inhibits hIDO, calling for re-evaluation of the
action mechanism of this commonly used antitumor chemothera-
peutic agent. They also suggest the newly discovered quinone-
containing hIDO inhibitors,16-18 like MtoC, may selectively bind
to the Si site. Taken together the data presented in this work provide
the first glimpse of the Si site that offers potential guidelines for
future development of more efficient hIDO inhibitors.
Acknowledgment. We would like to thank Dr. Denis L.
Rousseau for valuable discussions.
Supporting Information Available: The Materials and Methods, the
absorption spectra of the substrate-free and L-Trp-bound ferric hIDO and the
associated L-Trp titration data, as well as the Michaelis-Menten plot with
respect to L-1MTrp and a cartoon illustrating the Si site of hIDO. This material
As a control experiment, the inhibitory effect of 1MTrp was
examined. 1MTrp has been widely used as an hIDO inhibitor.19
As shown in Figure 2c, the L-isomer acts as a competitive inhibitor,
with a Ki of 32 µM, while the D-isomer exhibits no inhibitory effect
(data not shown), consistent with that reported by Hou et al.20
Additional studies show, in the absence of L-Trp, L-1MTrp itself
can act as a substrate, although kcat is 50-fold lower than that of
L-Trp (Figure S2), similar to that reported by Chauhan et al.21 In
addition, our data show that L-1MTrp exhibits substrate-inhibition
behavior, indicating, like L-Trp, L-1MTrp binds to the Si site at
elevated concentrations, thereby inhibiting hIDO activity. The 29-
fold higher Ksi value, as compared to that of L-Trp (Table 1),
indicates the bulky methyl group on the indole nitrogen significantly
lowers its affinity toward the Si site.
References
(1) Takikawa, O. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 338, 12–19.
(2) Sono, M.; Roach, M. P.; Coulter, E. D.; Dawson, J. H. Chem. ReV. 1996,
96 (7), 2841–2888.
(3) Yamamoto, S.; Hayaishi, O. J. Biol. Chem. 1967, 242 (22), 5260–6.
(4) Muller, A. J.; DuHadaway, J. B.; Donover, P. S.; Sutanto-Ward, E.;
Prendergast, G. C. Nat. Med. 2005, 11 (3), 312–9.
(5) Sono, M.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Hayaishi, O. J. Biol. Chem. 1980,
255 (4), 1339–45.
(6) Papadopoulou, N. D.; Mewies, M.; McLean, K. J.; Seward, H. E.;
Svistunenko, D. A.; Munro, A. W.; Raven, E. L. Biochemistry 2005, 44
(43), 14318–28.
(7) Macchiarulo, A.; Nuti, R.; Bellocchi, D.; Camaioni, E.; Pellicciari, R.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1774 (8), 1058–68.
(8) Copeland, R. A. Enzymes, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2000.
(9) Torres, M. I.; Lopez-Casado, M. A.; Lorite, P.; Rios, A. Clin. Exp. Immunol.
2007, 148 (3), 419–24.
(10) Bunn, H. F.; Poyton, R. O. Physiol. ReV. 1996, 76 (3), 839–85.
(11) Ishimura, Y.; Nozaki, M.; Hayaishi, O. J. Biol. Chem. 1970, 245 (14), 3593–
602.
In summary, our data demonstrate that hIDO possesses two
substrate binding sites, an active binding site and a Si site (as
illustrated in a cartoon shown in Figure S3). The binding of L-Trp
in the substrate binding site introduces a conformational change to
the Si site to allow it to accommodate molecules with a wide variety
of structures, including L-Trp, 1MTrp, IDE, and MtoC. We
demonstrated that, by binding to the Si site, these molecules can
act as either an effector or an inhibitor. It is important to note that
L-Trp-binding induced conformational changes to hIDO have been
implicated in the crystallographic data,22 as well as molecular
dynamics simulations,7 while the allosteric structural transition
induced by the binding of L-Trp, L-1MTrp, or MtoC in the Si site,
which gives rise to the inhibition of the active catalysis, remains
to be further investigated. Nonetheless, the data presented in this
work offer new mechanistic insights into the substrate-inhibition
behavior of hIDO, as well as the functional mechanisms of its
effector, IDE, and inhibitor, MtoC.
(12) Rengasamy, A.; Johns, R. A. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996, 276 (1), 30–3.
(13) Jones, D. P.; Mason, H. S. J. Biol. Chem. 1978, 253 (14), 4874–80.
(14) Sono, M. Biochemistry 1989, 28 (13), 5400–7.
(15) Carter, S. K.; Crooke, S. T. Mitomycin C: current status and new
deVelopments; Academic Press: New York, 1979.
(16) Kumar, S.; Malachowski, W. P.; DuHadaway, J. B.; LaLonde, J. M.; Carroll,
P. J.; Jaller, D.; Metz, R.; Prendergast, G. C.; Muller, A. J. J. Med. Chem.
2008, 51 (6), 1706–18.
(17) Carr, G.; Chung, M. K.; Mauk, A. G.; Andersen, R. J. J. Med. Chem. 2008,
51 (9), 2634–7.
(18) Volgraf, M.; Lumb, J. P.; Brastianos, H. C.; Carr, G.; Chung, M. K.; Munzel, M.;
Mauk, A. G.; Andersen, R. J.; Trauner, D. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008, 4 (9), 535–7.
(19) Cady, S. G.; Sono, M. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1991, 291 (2), 326–33.
(20) Hou, D. Y.; Muller, A. J.; Sharma, M. D.; DuHadaway, J.; Banerjee, T.;
Johnson, M.; Mellor, A. L.; Prendergast, G. C.; Munn, D. H. Cancer Res.
2007, 67 (2), 792–801.
(21) Chauhan, N.; Thackray, S. J.; Rafice, S. A.; Eaton, G.; Lee, M.; Efimov,
I.; Basran, J.; Jenkins, P. R.; Mowat, C. G.; Chapman, S. K.; Raven, E. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (12), 4186–7.
(22) Sugimoto, H.; Oda, S.; Otsuki, T.; Hino, T.; Yoshida, T.; Shiro, Y. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103 (8), 2611–6.
JA9029768
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 36, 2009 12867