X.-F. Xu et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 25 (2014) 406–410
407
determinedby1H NMRspectroscopy usingmesityleneasaninternal
standard. When the amount of BF3ꢀEt2O was increased to 0.15 equiv,
increasing yields of 3a were obtained with 0.15 equiv of BF3ꢀEt2O
resulting in a 99% yield (entries 1–5). Nevertheless, further increases
in the amount of BF3ꢀEt2O resulted in dramatically decreasing yields
(entries 6–9). Performances in different solvents were scanned
(entries 10–17), eventually confirming that diethyl ether afforded a
comparative yield (entry 17). Higher temperatures were tolerated
for this reaction (entries 17–19). In an effort to get a milder reaction
condition, studies with prolonged reaction times at room tempera-
ture were tried and, to our delight, an excellent yield was provided
after 2 h in diethyl ether (entry 21), while dichloromethane only led
to lower yield of 82% (entry 22). Therefore, the following optimal
reaction conditions were established: aldehyde 2a (1 mmol), indole
1 (2 equiv), and BF3ꢀEt2O (0.15 equiv) in Et2O (2 mL) at room
temperature for 2 h.
Fig. 1. Structures of R2COꢀ ꢀ ꢀBF3 and R3Nꢀ ꢀ ꢀBF3 complexes.
using a vacuum rotary evaporator. The resulting residue was
purified by column chromatography on silica gel column using
EtOAc/petroleum ether solution (1:15–1:8, v/v) as eluent to afford
the desired product bis(indolyl)phenylmethane 3a. Yield: 290 mg
(90%); pink solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):
d 7.91 (s, 2H), 7.39 (d,
2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.36 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.35 (d, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.28
(t, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.22–7.19 (m, 1H), 7.17 (t, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.00 (t,
2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.66 (d, 2H, J = 1.5 Hz), 5.89 (s, 1H). 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3):
122.1, 120.1, 119.9, 119.4, 111.2, 40.4.
For detailed experimental procedure, crystallographic data,
characterization data of the products, and copies of 1H NMR and
13C NMR, see Supporting information.
d
144.2, 136.9, 128.9, 128.4, 127.2, 126.3, 123.8,
With the optimal conditions in hand, we set about expanding the
scope of aldehydes (Table 2). Aromatic, heteroaromatic, fused,
aliphatic and enal aldehydes are suitable substrates to synthesize
bis(indolyl)methanes with moderate to excellent yields. Aromatic
aldehydes with neutral, electron-donating and electron-withdraw-
ing groups on the phenyl ring were tolerated. Methyl (2b), nitro (2e),
p-chloro (2g), o-chloro (2h) and 2,4-dichloro (2i) substituents
produced the corresponding products in excellent yields of above
89%. Benzaldehydes with oxygen-bearing functional groups, such as
methoxyl (2c) and hydroxy (2d), gave somewhat lower yields,
presumably due to the complexation of oxygen with BF3ꢀEt2O.
Cyanobenzaldehyde 2f with a versatile cyano group in known
organic transformation produced 3f in 63% yield. Reaction of
naphthaldehyde 2j gave 3j which also occurred in good yield of 87%
(entry10) withthe structureof 3j further confirmed by single crystal
X-ray crystallography (Fig. 2) [33]. Heteroaromatic aldehydes, such
as thiophenecarboxaldehyde 2k and furfural 2l provided moderate
yields (entries 11 and 12). Cinnamyl aldehyde 2m was also tested,
and only a low yield was obtained (entries 13). Aliphatic aldehydes,
such as phenylacetaldehyde 2n, formaldehyde 2o and isovaler-
aldehyde 2p afforded the corresponding products 3n, 3o and 3p in
36%, 40% and 72% yields, respectively (entries 14–16). The reactions
of 7-methyl-1H-indole and 5-bromo-1H-indole were also examined
and the corresponding products 3q and 3r were obtained in good
yields of 88% and 92%, respectively.
3. Results and discussion
Initially, we aimed at determining the optimal reaction condi-
tions for the synthesis of bis(indolyl)methanes (Table 1). The
treatment of indole 1 with benzaldehyde 2a was used as a model
reaction to screen various amount of catalysts, diverse solvents, and
different reaction times and temperatures. The yields of 3a were
Table 1
Optimization of reaction conditions.
CHO
H
H
N
.
BF3 Et2O
2
+
solvent, T, t
HN
NH
1
2a
3a
Entrya
BF3.Et2O (equiv.)
Solvent
t (min)
T (8C)b
1H NMR
Furthermore, the less reactive ketonic substrates 4a–f were
chosen to evaluate this methodology with indoles (Table 3).
Aliphatic ketones such as acetone 4a and 2-pentanone 4b were
yield (%)c
1
0
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
DMF
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
60
120
120
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
60
100
r.t.
r.t.
r.t.
3
24c
71
2
0.03
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.30
0.80
1.20
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
3
4
89
5
99 (90)d
59d
59
6
7
8
26
9
3
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
74
CH3OH
CH3CN
Toluene
EtOAc
THF
75
79
85
96
97
t-BuOMe
Et2O
98
99
Et2O
93
Et2O
97
Et2O
90
Et2O
98 (90)d
82
CH2Cl2
a
Reaction conditions: benzaldehyde 2a (1 mmol), indole 1 (2 equiv), BF3ꢀEt2O
(specified amount) in solvent (2 mL).
b
The heating temperature of oil bath.
1H NMR yields, using mesitylene as an internal standard.
c
d
Isolated yield.
Fig. 2. X-ray single crystal structure of 3j.