1034
S. V. Malhotra, Y. Wang / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 17 (2006) 1032–1035
Table 2. Results of the 1,4-addition of diethylzinc to enones in the
presence of chiral ionic liquids
2. Penne, J. S. Chiral Auxiliaries and Ligands in Asymmetric
Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1995; 420pp.
3. Soai, K. Enantiomer 1999, 4, 591.
Entry Enone
ChirILa Temperature
Product
4. Knopff, O.; Alexakis, A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3835.
5. Feringa, B. L.; Pineschi, M.; Arnold, L. A.; Imbos, R.; De
Vries, A. H. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 2620.
6. New Methodologies in Asymmetric Catalysis; Malhotra, S. V.,
Ed.; Oxford Press: New York, 2004; p 43.
7. Alexakis, A.; Vastra, J.; Burton, J.; Benhaim, C.; Mangeney,
P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7869.
8. Schinnert, M.; Seitz, M.; Kaiser, A.; Reiser, O. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 4259.
9. Arena, C. G.; Casilli, V.; Faraone, F. Tetrahedron: Asymme-
try 2003, 14, 2127.
10. Hu, X.; Chen, H.; Zhang, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
3518.
11. Chataigner, I.; Gennari, C.; Pairulli, U.; Ceccarelli, S. Chem.
Eur. J. 2001, 7, 2628.
(ꢁC)
Yieldb eec
(%)
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Cyclohexenone
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
À20
0 (23)
À20
0 (23)
À20
0 (23)
À20
0 (23)
À20
0 (23)
À20
0 (23)
90
76
Cyclohexenone
Cyclohexenone
Cyclohexenone
Cyclopentenone
Cyclopentenone
Cyclopentenone
Cyclopentenone
Chalcone
93 (94) 68 (52)
87 35
90 (91) 26 (24)
40 73
39 (46) 55 (50)
48 20
48 (52) 15 (12)
52 61
55 (57) 48 (37)
55 37
57 (58) 28 (23)
10
11
12
Chalcone
Chalcone
Chalcone
12. Shi, M.; Zhang, W. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15,
167.
13. Seebach, D.; Oei, H. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1975,
14, 634.
14. Zhao, H.; Malhotra, S. V. Aldrichim. Acta 2002, 35, 75.
15. Gordon, C. M. Appl. Catal. A: General 2001, 222, 101.
16. Earle, M. J.; McCormac, P. B.; Seddon, K. R. Green Chem.
1999, 1, 23.
a 35 mol % ChirIL mixed with 3 mol % Cu(OTf)2.
b Isolated yield.
c Based on the specific rotation measured using ATUOPOL IV polari-
meter. The ee measurements were also confirmed by HPLC using Chir-
alpak WH column.
can provide the same effect in inducing chirality in a conju-
gate addition, as seen through the combination of an ionic
liquid and a chiral catalyst. Product enantioselectivities
were lower for all three substrates using ChirIL 2. Notice-
able difference between results from 1 and 2 suggests that
the chirality induced by the ‘active species’ is to some
extent, also influenced by the achiral anion. Overall, this
investigation has given us an important insight into the
application of chiral ionic liquids as a source of chiral
induction.
17. Howarth, J.; Hanlon, K.; Fayne, D.; McCormac, P. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3097.
18. Pegot, B.; Thanh, G. V.; Gori, D.; Loupy, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 6425.
19. Wasserscheid, P.; Bosmann, A.; Bolm, C. Chem. Commun.
2002, 3, 200.
20. Levillain, J.; Dubant, G.; Abrunhosa, I.; Gulea, M.; Gau-
mont, A. C. Chem. Commun. 2003, 23, 2914.
21. Zhao, H.; Luo, R. G.; Malhotra, S. V. Bitechnol. Prog. 2003,
19, 1016.
22. Zhao, H.; Malhotra, S. V. Biotech. Lett. 2002, 24, 1257.
23. Brwon, H. C.; Ramachandran, P. V. J. Organomet. Chem.
1995, 500, 1.
3. Conclusion
24. Blaser, H. U. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 935.
25. Chrisman, W.; Camara, J. N.; Marcellini, K.; Singaram, B.;
Goralski, C. T.; Hasha, D. L.; Rudolf, P. R.; Nicholson, L.
W.; Borodychuk, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5805.
26. Goldfuss, B.; Steigelmann, M.; Khan, S. I.; Houk, K. N.
J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 77–82.
We have demonstrated that chiral ionic liquids could be
‘designed’ from a known chiral auxiliary such as a-pinene.
It has been shown that these chiral ionic liquids can be used
as an additive or a co-solvent to achieve asymmetric induc-
tion. Although, currently the enantioselectivity obtained is
moderate to good, several important parameters have been
studied. The useful insight into the understanding of the
application of chiral ionic liquids has led to ‘design’ of
other ChirILs derived from terpenes, which should afford
higher enenioselectivities. The results of these studies will
be reported in due course.
27. (a) Synthesis of isopinocamphelyl oxazolium tetrafluroborate
1 ([IpcOxa]+[BF4]À): Reacting isopinocamphelyl oxazolium
bromide31 with an aqueous solution of sodium tetrafluro-
borate gave product 1 as a viscous liquid. This was washed
with water and acetone. The organic mass was dissolved in
ether and dried on anhydrous MgSO4. Evaporation of the
solvent gave product 1, yield: 83.7%; 1H NMR d: 0.86 (m,
3H, CH3), 0.90 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.19 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.69 (s, 3H,
CH3), 2.12 (1H, CH2), 3.36 (1H, CH), 3.91 (1H, CH), 5.31
(1H, H), 5.43 (1H, H), 5.82 (1H, H). (b) Synthesis of
isopinocamphelyl oxazolium hexafluoro-phosphate 2 ([Ipc-
Oxa]+[PF6]À): Reaction of isopinocamphelyl oxazolium bro-
mide,31 with an aqueous solution of sodium hexafluoro-
phosphate gave product 2 as a viscous liquid. This was
washed first with water and then acetone. The organic mass
was dissolved in ether, dried on anhydrous MgSO4. Evapo-
ration of the solvent gave product 2, yield: 88%; 1H NMR d:
0.88 (m, 3H, CH3), 0.90 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.19 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.69
(s, 3H, CH3), 2.14 (1H, CH2), 3.38 (1H, CH), 3.91 (1H, CH),
5.36/5.37 (1H, H), 5.48/5.46 (1H, H), 5.84 (1H, H).
28. Kurth, M. J.; Decker, O. H. W.; Hpe, H.; Yanuck, M. D.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 443.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Richard DeJianne, for the mass
spectrometric and NMR analysis.
References
1. Jacobsen, E. N.; Pfaltz, A.; Yamamoto, H. Compre-
hensive Asymmetric Catalysis; Springer: New York, 1999;
1105pp.