Silica-Supported Ni(II)–DABCO Complex: An Eicient and Reusable Catalyst for the Heck Reaction
obtained upon catalyst removal. The ICP analysis in good
agreement with these results, because only 0.043 ppm of Ni
being obtained in the hot iltrate aqueous solution. On the
other hand, TEM image of the reused catalyst demonstrates
that the structure of Ni/silica has no signiicant change in
comparison with fresh catalyst (Fig. 6c), Also, the observed
ICP analysis from the aqueous solution of reaction mixture
(after 6th run) displayed only a low amount of nickel metal
(0.088 ppm) was leach out from the catalyst, indicating
that the attachment between nickel nanoparticles and silica
matrix is suiciently strong (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7 Reusability of the catalyst in the Suzuki–Miyaura
4 Conclusions
products in excellent yields. Also, for the less active chlo-
robenzene and its derivatives a longer time was needed to
obtain a moderate yields. The electronic efect on the yields
and reaction times was also examined in this reaction sys-
tem. Overall, the coupling reaction of methyl aclylate with
electron withdrawing aryl halides gave better conversions
in shorter reaction times. In order to clarify the efect of
grafted DABCO on the catalyst performance, a new cata-
lytic system based on nickel immobilized onto silica sur-
face (Ni@SiO2) was easily prepared without the use of
DABCO section. This catalytic system was then applied
to the Heck coupling of various aryl halides with methyl
acrylate (Table 2, entry 12–15). It can be clearly seen that
our catalyst is superior to ligand-Free Ni@SiO2 catalyst
system in terms of reaction condition, reaction time and
yield, indicating that the DABCO as an important func-
tional entity acts as a highly stable linker or/and a chela-
tor to graft catalysts onto silica and increases the stability
and reactivity of Ni(II) species during the production pro-
cess by synergistic efect of coordination and electrostatic
interactions.
In conclusion, silica-DABCO-Ni(II) complex nanocatalyst
was successfully synthesized and well characterized by dif-
ferent techniques. The obtained product was then used as
heterogeneous catalyst for Heck–Mizoroki cross-coupling
reaction and exhibited a high catalytic activity and could be
easily recovered at least six times.
Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge the funding sup-
port received for this project from the Isfahan University of Technol-
ogy (IUT), IR of Iran, and Isfahan Science and Technology Town
(ISTT), IR of Iran. Further inancial support from the Center of Excel-
lence in Sensor and Green Chemistry Research (IUT) is gratefully
acknowledged.
References
1. Diederich F, Stang PJ (2008) John Wiley & Sons, New York
2. Tsuji J (2002) John Wiley & Sons, New York
3. Jana R, Pathak TP, Sigman MS (2011) Chem Rev
111:1417–1492
4. Wang L, Li P, Zhang Y (2004) Chem Commun 5:514–515
5. Yang CT, Zhang ZQ, Liu YC, Liu L (2011) Angew Chem Int Ed
123:3990–3993
The level of recyclability of catalyst is highly prefer-
able for its industrial applications. In order to studied this
issue, the recovery of the catalyst was examined by using
bromobenzene and methyl acrylate under optimized reac-
tion conditions. For this, after each run, the catalytic sys-
tem was separated from the reaction mixture by iltration
and washed with acetone several times, dried at 70°C, and
used for the next cycle. As shown in Fig. 5, this catalyst
system could be reusable at least for 6 times without any
signiicant decreasing in its catalytic performance until
the ifth reuse. However, the yield of the reaction in the
6th run declined to 74%. To probe the nature of the active
species, i.e., surface or leached Ni, a hot-iltration test was
performed by using of bromobenzene and methyl acrylate
as coupling partners. The solid catalyst was separated
from the reaction mixture after 1 h (34%, analyzed by GC)
and the iltrate was continued for an additional 3 h. After
this time, no further improvement in isolated yield was
6. Zhang L, Zuo Z, Leng X, Huang Z (2014) Angew Chem Int Ed
53:2696
7. Adeli M, Mehdipour E, Bavadi M (2010) J Appl Polym Sci
116:2188–2196
8. Magano J, Dunetz J (2011) Chem Rev 11:2177–2250
9. Nicolaou KC, Bulger PG, Sarlah D (2005) Angew Chem Int Ed
44:4442–4489
10. Bobes FG, Fu GC (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128:5360–5361
11. Leowanawat P, Zhang N, Resmerita AM, Rosen BM, Percec V
(2011) J Org Chem 76:9946–9995
12. Knappke CEI, von Wangelin AJ (2010) Angew Chem Int Ed
49:3568–3570
13. Hu X (2011) Chem Sci 2:1867–1886
14. Zultanski SL, Fu GC (2013) J Am Chem Soc 135:624–627
15. Zhang N, Hofman DJ, Gutsche N, Gupta J, Percec V (2012) J
Org Chem 77:5956–5964
16. Xian YL, Guo WH, He GZ, Pan Q, Zhang X (2014) Angew
Chem Int Ed 53:1
17. Matsubara R, Gutierrez AC, Jamison TF (2011) J Am Chem Soc
133:19020–19023
1 3