7
92 Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. Vol. 79, No. 5 (2006)
Ó 2006 The Chemical Society of Japan
Table 1. Preliminary Results of Acetophenon and Propio-
phenon Reduction with Ni–Al Alloy in Water (H2O and
D2O)
Ni-Al alloy
H O
2
H2
a)
1
1
20 °C
0 min
O
Ni-Al alloy
H pressure
R
R
2
water
oil bath heating
microwave heating
165 kPa
207 kPa
microwave (50 W)
Entry
R
Water
Time/min
Yield/%
Scheme 2.
1
2
3
4
Me
Et
Me
Et
H2O
H2O
10
10
30
30
quant
81
quant
quant
6
4
2
0
0
0
0
D O
2
D2O
a) Conditions: starting ketones (200 mg), Ni–Al alloy (1.0 g),
and water (2 mL) were used.
should be very useful since the reaction proceeds very rapidly
and can be used as a deuteration.
Experimental
The Ni–Al alloy (50 wt % of Ni and Al, Wako Chemical Ltd.)
was used as received. Other chemicals purchased were used as
received without further purification. D2O (99% D-content) was
used for the deuteration reaction. The microwave apparatus
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
irradiation power / W
Fig. 2. Plots of conversion against irradiation power in the
reaction of Ni–Al alloy and water.
(
CEM Discover, 2.45 GHz frequency, CEM Corporation, NC
U.S.A.) was used for irradiation. GC analyses were performed us-
ing a Shimadzu GC-14A with a capillary column (DB-1, 50 m).
The GC-MS measurements were conducted with a Nippon Denshi
SUN-200 spectrometer (electron impact system with a 70 eV ion-
ization energy).
A typical microwave irradiation experiment (i.e. Scheme 1)
used 200 mg (1.67 mmol) of acetophenone, 1.0 g of Ni–Al alloy,
and 2 mL of H2O in a pressure resistant glass ampoule equipped
with a rubber septum and an aluminum cap. The loaded ampoule
As previously mentioned, to generate isothermal reaction
conditions, the irradiation power was automatically fluctuated.
Therefore, we investigated this microwave-assisted reduction
under the conditions at constant power with continuous irradi-
ation in more detail.
Figure 2 plots the microwave irradiation power against the
acetophenone conversion. Although the acetophenone conver-
sion was increased as the microwave irradiation power increas-
ed up to 50 W, more powerful irradiation did not affect the
conversion. When the reaction of the Ni–Al alloy with water
was conducted with continuous microwave irradiation of 50 W
under the same conditions described in Scheme 2, the hydro-
gen pressure was 413 kPa.
(
10 mL capacity) was introduced into the cavity of the microwave
ꢀ
apparatus and irradiated with microwaves for 60 min at 120 C.
The ampoule was cooled in an ice/water bath and the organic ma-
terials were extracted with ether. The ether fraction was analyzed
by GC and GC-MS to identify and quantify the products.
Table 1 lists the results of acetophenone and propiophenone
reduction using the Ni–Al alloy catalyst in water (H2O and
D2O) under continuous microwave irradiation at 50 W. When
microwaves were continuously irradiated at a fixed power
References
1 P. T. Anastas, J. C. Warner, in Green Chemistry: Theory
and Practice, Oxford University Press, New York, 1988, p. 24.
2
3
4
5
6
E. L. Martin, Org. React. 1942, 1, 155.
E. Vedjes, Org. React. 1975, 22, 401.
D. Todd, Org. React. 1948, 4, 378.
L. K. Keefer, Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 459.
K. Ishimoto, Y. Mitoma, S. Nagashima, H. Tashiro, G. K. S.
(
50 W), the reaction time was up to 10 min shorter than the
ꢀ
isothermal conditions (120 C) and the corresponding alkyl-
benzenes were obtained in good yields (Entries 1 and 2). D2O
was also applicable to this reaction as a deuterium source and
solvent. Although the reaction required a longer time than
H2O, the expected ethylbenzene-d5 and n-propylbenzene-d7
were obtained in quantitative yields (Entries 3 and 4). GC-
MS analysis was used to determine the amount of deuterium
introduced.
Prakash, G. A. Olah, M. Tashiro, Chem. Commun. 2003, 514.
7
8
L. Perreux, A. Loupy, Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9199.
P. Lidstr o¨ m, J. Tierney, B. Wathey, J. Westman, Tetra-
hedron 2001, 57, 9225.
9
C. O. Kappe, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6250.
In summary, we have demonstrated the convenient reduc-
tion of acetophenones using a Ni–Al alloy with water under
microwave irradiation. The presently developed method
10 J. W. Walkiewicz, G. Kazonich, J. L. McGill, Miner.
Metall. Process. 1988, 5, 39.
11 J. H. P. Tyman, J. Appl. Chem. 1970, 20, 179.