2
138
GOLOUNIN et al.
Table 2. Composition of the reaction mixture obtained after
60°C. In the process, the mixture was bubbled with
–
1
ultrasonic treatment of a benzene solution of naphthalene in
air for 30 min at a rate of 200 ml min . After the treat-
ment completion, water was added, the mixture was
shaken, the aqueous solution was separated, and the tar
precipitated on the beaker walls was washed out with
benzene and acetone. The organic solutions were com-
–
1
the presence of 10% AlBr
.5 h)
3
(air flow 200 ml min , 60°C,
0
Compound
MW Yield, %
Naphthalene
-Phenylacetic acid
128
136
230
284
210
204
206
208
7.7
18.7
0.8
bined, dried over CaCl , filtered, and vacuum-evaporated.
2
The yield was quantitative. To evaluate the contribu-
tion from benzene condensation to the tar formation,
we subjected a solution of aluminum bromide in ben-
zene to ultrasonic treatment. No significant amount of
tar was formed upon 30-min treatment. The results of
GC/MS analysis of the tar are listed in Table 2.
2
Hexadecanoic acid
Oleic acid
0.7
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
,4-Diphenylbutane
-Phenylnaphthalene
0.8
4.6
0.7
4.7
The tar composition was determined on an HP
6
890A gas chromatograph equipped with an HP 5972A
mass-selective detector, using NIST CSD database
275000 compounds). We used an HP-5MS quartz col-
,2-Dihydro-1-phenylnaphthalene
,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-1-phenylnaphthalene
-Phenylnaphthalene
(
umn, 30 m long, 0.25 mm i.d., coated with a 0.3-μm
layer of 5% diphenyl–95% dimethylsiloxane copolymer.
204
280
254
254
178
312
252
258
278
8.9
1.0
1.5
5.3
0.4
0.5
0.2
2.1
0.5
,7-Diphenylnaphthalene
Conditions of GC/MS analysis: initial column
temperature 70°C, 4 min; linear heating at a rate of
1
,2 -Binaphthyl
1
–1
,2 -Binaphthyl
100 deg min ; final temperature 300°C, 5 min; vapor-
izer temperature 280°C; sample volume 1 μl. The mass
spectra were recorded with electron impact ionization
Phenanthrene
,10-Diphenylphenanthrene
Perylene
9
(
70 eV). The scanning rate was 1 scan per second, and
the scanning range, 40–600 amu.
1
1
1
1
1
The organic compounds were identified by com-
parison of the experimental mass spectra with those
from the NIST CSD database using the ChemStation
standard system for GC/MS data processing. Poly-
cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were analyzed in
the mode of selective detection of individual ions, with
identification by characteristic ions and retention
times, using solutions of reference substances.
1
9
,2 ,3 ,4 -Tetrahydro-1,2 -binaphthyl
1
1
,10-Dihydrobenz[1 , 2 ]-anthracene
Benz[j]fluoranthene
Benz[k]fluoranthene
Tetrahydro[k]fluoranthene
Benz[e]pyrene
252
252
256
252
252
258
260
0.1
0.3
0.7
0.1
2.4
0.1
0.3
According to the chromatogram, the stripping oil
contained (%) naphthalene 18.7, alkylated naphthale-
nes 45, dibenzofuran 11.5, acenaphthene 7.6, and fluo-
rene about 2. High-boiling carcinogenic compounds
were absent (Table 1).
Benz[a]pyrene
Tetrahydrobenz[a]pyrene
Octahydrobenz[a]pyrene
After the cavitation treatment, the oil composition
changed considerably: The amount of naphthalene and
methylnaphthalenes decreased, and di- and trimethyl-
naphthalenes virtually disappeared. At the same time,
the amount of 2-ethylnaphthalene and dibenzofuran
increased, which suggests their relative inertness under
the experimental conditions. The appearance of benz[a]-
pyrene in the reaction mixture points to the occurrence
of polycondensation. Apparently, benz[a]pyrene is
not chromatographically detectable changes. There-
fore, we performed a combined cavitation-catalytic
treatment of naphthalene. The procedure was as follows.
A glass beaker was charged with 1 g of naphtha-
lene and 20 ml of benzene, after which 0.1 g of AlBr3
was added. A plate-type emitter was immersed, and
the UZDN-2T device was switched on. The tempera-
ture increased in the course of the treatment from 20 to
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 81 No. 12 2008