1276
M. J. Bhanushali et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 1273–1276
5. (a) Emerson, W. S. In Org. React.; Wiley, 1948; Vol. 4, p.
174; (b) Lane, C. F. Synthesis 1975, 135; (c) Hutchins, R.
O.; Hutchins, M. K. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis;
Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991;
Vol. 8, pp 25–78; (d) Tarasevich, V. A.; Kozlov, N. G.
Russ. Chem. Rev. 1999, 68, 55; (e) Baxter, E. W.; Reitz, A.
B. In Org. React.; Wiley, 2002; Vol. 59, p 1 and references
cited therein.
To evaluate the general applicability of this reagent,
a variety of aldehydes and ketones were reductively
aminated with aliphatic and aromatic amines (Table 2,
entries 1–22).19 The reaction of aniline with benzalde-
hyde (entry 1) gave a 94% yield of N-benzylaniline with-
in 1.5 h. Similarly, primary and secondary aliphatic
amines (entries 2, 8–12) when reacted with benzaldehyde
afforded the corresponding N-benzyl derivatives in
excellent yields. Another important feature of this
protocol was the survival of a variety of reducible func-
tional groups such as chloro, cyano, nitro and methoxy
(entries 3–7). The system also allowed the DRA of cin-
namaldehyde, to N-cinnamyl aniline in an excellent yield
without affecting the double bond (entry 15). Similarly
aliphatic aldehydes such as valeraldehyde and isobutyr-
aldehyde were also aminated effectively (entries 13–14).
6. Hutchins, R. O.; Natale, N. R. Org. Prep. Proced. Int.
1979, 11, 201.
7. (a) Pelter, A.; Rosser, R. M.; Mills, S. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 717; (b) Bomann, M. D.; Guch,
I. C.; DiMare, M. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5995; (c)
Moorman, A. E. Synth. Commun. 1993, 23, 789.
8. Yoon, N. M.; Kim, E. G.; Son, H. S.; Choi, J. Synth.
Commun. 1993, 23, 1595.
9. Micovic, I. V.; Ivanovic, M. D.; Paitak, D. M.; Bojic, V.
Dj. Synthesis 1991, 1043.
10. Brussee, J. R.; van Benthem, A. T. M.; Kruse, C. G.; van
der Gen, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1990, 1, 163.
11. Bhattacharyya, S.; Chatterjee, A.; Duttachowdhury, S. K.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 1.
12. Abdel-Magid, A. F.; Carson, K. G.; Harris, B. D.;
Maryanoff, C. A.; Shah, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3849.
13. Ranu, B. C.; Majee, A.; Sarkar, A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
370.
14. (a) Shibata, I.; Suwa, T.; Sugiyama, E.; Baba, A. Synlett
1998, 1081; (b) Shibata, I.; Moriuchi-Kawakami, T.;
Tanizawa, D.; Suwa, T.; Sugiyama, E.; Matsuda, H.;
Baba, A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 383.
15. Borch, R. F.; Bernstein, M. D.; Durst, H. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1971, 93, 2897.
To check the overall compatibility of this protocol, the
direct reductive amination of ketones was also carried
out. A variety of ketones such as acetone, butan-2-one
and cyclohexanone were efficiently aminated with
various aliphatic and aromatic amines under mild condi-
tions to afford the corresponding amines (entries 16–22)
in good to excellent yields.
In summary, bis(triphenylphosphine) copper(l) tetra-
hydroborate has proved to be an excellent reagent for
direct reductive amination of both aldehydes and
ketones having different steric and electronic properties.
The ease of making, handling, storing and using 1,
together with its compatibility with a large number of
functional groups, makes this reagent an attractive and
general alternative to the present range of methods for
the direct reductive amination procedures. There is also
considerable scope for modifying the reagent with a
chiral phosphine ligand with the prospect of asymmetric
induction.
16. (a) Fleet, G. W. J.; Harding, P. J. C. Tetrahedron Lett.
1979, 20, 975; (b) Sorrell, T. N.; Pearlman, P. S. J. Org.
Chem. 1980, 45, 3449.
17. Fleet, G. W. J.; Harding, P. J. C.; Whitcombe, M. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 4031.
18. Preparation of bis (triphenylphosphine) copper(I) tetra-
hydroborate: Finely powdered copper(I) chloride (10 g,
0.1 mol) was added to a stirred solution of triphenylphos-
phine (54 g, 0.205 mol) in chloroform (375 ml) over 5 min.
The reaction mixture was stirred until the copper chloride
had dissolved (15 min), then treated with a suspension of
sodium tetrahydroborate (3.8 g, 0.1 mol) in ethanol
(40 ml) and stirred for a further 15 min, and then added
to water (75 ml). The chloroform layer was washed with
water (2 · 65 ml), dried (magnesium sulphate) and treated
with diethyl ether (500 ml). Bis(triphenylphosphine) cop-
per(I) tetrahydroborate precipitated immediately and was
collected by filtration and washed with ether to give white
needles of 1, mp 172–174 ꢁC.
Acknowledgement
Financial assistance from TEQIP—Government of
India is kindly acknowledged.
References and notes
19. Typical procedure for DRA of aldehydes and ketones: To a
solution of carbonyl compound (6 mmol), amine (5 mmol)
and sulfamic acid (5 mmol) in 15 ml of methanol was
added Cu(PPh3)2BH4 (5 mmol) over a period of 5 min.
The reaction mixture was magnetically stirred at room
temperature. After completion of the reaction (monitored
by TLC), the reaction mixture was filtered and the filtrate
was evaporated to yield a crude product, which was
purified using silica gel (60–120 mesh) column chroma-
tography with petroleum ether–ethyl acetate as the eluent
to afford the pure amine.
1. Bradshaw, J. S.; Krakowiak, K. E.; Izatt, R. M. Tetra-
hedron 1992, 48, 4475.
2. (a) Merla, B.; Risch, N. Synthesis 2002, 1365; (b) Gordon,
E. M.; Barrett, R. W.; Dower, W. J.; Fodor, S. P. A.;
Gallop, M. A. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1385.
3. Kleeman, A.; Engel, J.; Kutscher, B.; Reichert, D. In
Pharmaceutical Substances, 3rd ed.; Thieme: Stuttgart,
1999.
4. Henkel, T.; Brunni, R. M.; Mueller, H.; Reichel, F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 38, 643.