7326 Zheng et al.
Asian J. Chem.
Table-1. The fermentations with wild and mutant isolates
shared the similar cell growth and glycerol uptake pattern (Figs.
3 and 4), indicating that knocking out of GDHt resulted in the
redistribution of the carbon flux. K. pneumoniae has the
sophisticated mechanism to maintain the substrate uptake and
cell growth. The product spectra may change under the diffe-
rent genetic or chemical conditions. 75.61 g lactate L-1 was
obtained in fed-batch with B1.9131, whereas only 40.99 g L-1
lactate was produced with CGMCC 1.9131. Ethanol formation
was also greatly enhanced in the first 24 h. Succinate production
remained almost at the same level, while 1,3-propanediol and
2,3-butanediol production decreased by about 56 and 75 %,
respectively.
Conclusion
This work attempts to understand GDHt's role in glycerol
consumption and 1,3-propanediol synthesis with a GDHt-
deficient mutant. GDHt-deficiency influence the activities of
other two dha regulon coding enzyme, 1,3-propanediol oxido-
reductase and glycerol dehydrogenase. 1,3-Propanediol
oxidoreductase activity deceased by 62 % in cultures with
mutant isolate, while the glycerol dehydrogenase activity
increased by 36 %. This is accompanied by that more carbon
is redistributed to lactate and ethanol formation. Cell growth
and glycerol uptake were not influnced during the culture with
GDHt-deficient isolate, suggesting K. pneumoniae metabolic
pathway is flexible to adapt genetic perturbation. However,
1,3-propanediol and 2,3-butanediol production decreased by
56 and 75 %, respectively. Therefore, GDHt is not indispens-
able in glycerol metabolism but is crucial for 1,3-propanediol
efficient production. Blocking of lactate and ethanol formation
may be a plausible approach to promoting 1,3-propanediol
production.
The gdh and gdhr genes encode GDHt and DDHt in K.
pneumoniae, respectively. K. pneumoniae ATCC 25955 can
produce both GDHt and DDHt, which are distinguishable in
vitro, whereas K. pneumoniaeATCC 8724 forms only DDHt5.
Although the two types of dehydratases have high sequence
homology, GDHt is a soluble cytosolic enzyme, whereas DDHt
is a low-solubility enzyme associated with carboxysome-like
polyhedral organelles6. To broaden knowledge on the diversity
of glycerol dehydratases, comprehensive sequence and mole-
cular modelling analyses of these enzymes were performed16.
The sequence analysis showed that GDHt and DDHt are not
related, suggesting that they evolved from different ancestors.
A gene fusion event occurred between α and β subunits of
GDHt in several bacteria during enzyme evolution. This is
confirmed by characterizing of GDHt expressed relying on
fusion of α- and β-subunits17. The fusion protein GDHALB/C
had the greatest catalytic activity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was supported by National Science and
Technology Support Program (2012BAA09B01), National
Natural Science Foundation of China (50976032), Natural
Science Foundation of Beijing (3101001) and the Fundamental
Research Funds for the Central Universities (12MS43).
REFERENCES
1. J. Kurian, J. Polym. Environ., 13, 159 (2005).
2. M. Emptage, S.L. Haynie, L.A. Laffend, J.P. Pucci and G. Whited, Process
for the Biological Production of 1,3-Propanediol with High Titer, US
Patent 6514733 (2003).
Some researchers concentrate to comparison of glycerol
dehydratases. GDHt and DDHt are isofunctional enzymes and
undergo mechanism-based inactivation by a physiological
substrate glycerol during catalysis. Inactivated holoenzymes
are reactivated by their own reactivating factors that mediate
the ATP-dependent exchange of an enzyme-bound, damaged
cofactor for free adenosylcobalamin through intermediary
formation of apoenzyme18. DDHt-reactivating factor cross-
reactivates the inactivated GDHt, GDHt-reactivating factor did
not cross-reactivate the inactivated DDHt. Interestingly, GDHt-
based chimeric enzymes which carried N-terminal portions
of the β and γ subunits of DDHt in the corresponding subunits
of glycerol dehydratase was constructed, resulting change of
solubility of the enzyme6. Recently, quantum mechanical/
molecular mechanical calculations of GDHt catalysis consi-
dered the electrostatic coupling between the quantum-mecha-
nical and molecular-mechanical subsystems and two alternative
mechanisms, demonstrating the importance of electrostatic
catalysis and hydrogen-bonding in enzyme-catalyzed radical
reactions19.
3. A.P. Zeng, H. Biebl, H. Schlieker andW.D. Deckwer, Enzym. Microbiol.
Technol., 15, 770 (1993).
4. T. Toraya, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 57, 106 (2000).
5. R. Daniel, T.A. Bobik, G. and Gottschalk, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 22,
553 (1998).
6. T. Tobimatsu, T. Nishiki, M. Morimoto, R. Miyata and T. Toraya, Arch.
Microbiol., 191, 199 (2009).
7. J.R. O'Brien, C. Raynaud, C. Croux, L. Girbal, P. Soucaille and W.N.
Lanzilotta, Biochemistry, 43, 4635 (2004).
8. T. Sakai, A.Yamasaki, S. Toyofuku, T. Nishiki, M.Yunoki, N. Komoto,
T. Tobimatsu and T. Toraya, J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol., 53, 102 (2007).
9. V.L. Miller and J.J. Mekalanos, J. Bacteriol., 170, 2575 (1988).
10. Z.M. Zheng, Y.Z. Xu, H.J. Liu, N.N. Guo, Z.Z. Cai and D.H. Liu,
Biotechnol. Bioeng., 100, 923 (2008).
11. S.J. Circle, L. Stone and C.S. Boruff, Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed., 17,
259 (1945).
12. T. Toraya, K. Ohashi and S. Fukui, Biochemistry, 14, 4255 (1975).
13. Y.Z. Xu, N.N. Guo, Z.M. Zheng, X.J. Ou, H.J. Liu and D.H. Liu,
Biotechnol. Bioeng., 104, 965 (2009).
14. Z.M. Zheng, K.K. Cheng, Q.L. Hu, H.J. Liu, N.N. Guo and D.H. Liu,
Biochem. Eng. J., 39, 305 (2008).
15. J. Hao, W. Wang, J. Tian, J. Li and D. Liu, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,
35, 735 (2008).
However, roles of GDHt and DDHt in 1,3-propanediol
production was less studied. GDHt mutant K. pneumoniae was
constructed via knocking out dhaB-α. GDHt mutant isolate is
used to study glycerol uptake and 1,3-propanediol synthesis
in fed-batch cultures. The enzymatic analysis indicated both
GDHt and DDHt were involved in the fermentation of glycerol.
This is confirmed by the occurrence of 1,3-propanediol forma-
tion in GDHt-deficient mutant cultures.
16. Y. Liu,A.A. Gallo, R.K. Bajpai,A. Chistoserdov,A.T. Nelson, L.N. Segura
and W. Xu, Int. J. Bioinf.. Res. Appl., 6, 484 (2010).
17. X.D. Wang, X.E. Zhang,Y.C. Guo, Z.P. Zhang, Z.A. Cao andY.F. Zhou,
Biotechnol. Lett., 31, 711 (2009).
18. H. Kajiura, K. Mori, N. Shibata and T. Toraya, FEBS J., 274, 5556
(2007).
19. Y. Liu, A.A. Gallo, J. Floria´n, Y.S. Liu, S. Mora and W. Xu, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 114, 5497 (2010).