4
H. Zhang et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 834 (2020) 155203
n
in ꢀ n
ðquinolineÞ
out
ðquinolineÞ
in
ðquinolineÞ
X ¼
ꢂ 100%
n
ꢀ
ꢁ . ꢀ
ꢁ
TOF ¼
n
ꢂ X
n
ꢂ t ꢂ D
ðnoble metalÞ
ðquinolineÞ
where X is the conversion of quinoline and nnoble metal, t and D
represent the total moles of noble metal, the reaction time and the
dispersion, respectively. The dispersion can be calculated as
follows:
D ¼ (6n
s
M)/(
p
rNd )
Fig. 5. (a) HAADF-STEM image of PtRuNi/C, (b) STEM-EDX elemental line-scanning
profile of an individual PtRuNi nanoparticle along the red arrow direction, red (Pt),
blue (Ru) and black (Ni). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure
legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Where n
s
signifies the number of metal atoms on the surface per
19
ꢀ2
19
ꢀ2
), M repre-
unit area (Pt: 1.12 ꢂ 10
m
and Ru: 1.63 ꢂ 10
m
g
ꢀ
1
sents the atomic mass of Pt or Ru (195.08
mol
and
ꢀ
1
r
represents the density
(l
¼ 0.154 nm, 40 kV and 30 mA). Transmission electron micro-
ꢀ3
23
ꢀ3
of the metal (
,
Ru ¼ 12.1 g cm ). N is the
scopy images were captured on an FEI TECNAI F30 electron mi-
croscope at 300 kV acceleration voltage. X-ray photoelectron
spectra (XPS) of the samples were recorded on a PHI Quantum 2000
Avogadro’s number (6.023 ꢂ 10 mol ), and d
p
is the average size
ꢀ9
of the metallic particles (d
p
¼ 6.52 ꢂ 10 m, from Fig. 3).
Scanning ESCA Microprobe analyzer with Al
Ka irradiation
3. Results and discussions
(hn
¼ 1486.6 eV), the binding energy of C 1s (284.6 eV) was used as
the internal standard. High-angle annular dark field scanning
transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images and
STEM energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (STEM-EDX) elemental
mapping and line-scanning results of the catalysts were obtained
using a TECNAI F30 electron microscope at 300 kV acceleration
voltage. High-sensitivity low-energy ion scattering (HS-LEIS)
spectra of the catalysts were obtained on an IonTOF Qtac100 low-
energy ion scattering analyzer. The low ion flux was
3
.1. Characterization results of the samples
Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of as-synthesized samples that
were used to analyze the crystallite phase structures and dispersion
of the catalysts. Fig. 1A displays the XRD patterns of Ni/C, Ru/C and
RuNi/C. The diffraction peaks at 2
and 62.7 are assigned to the (001), (110), (101), (102), (110) and
(111) planes of Ni(OH)
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
q
¼ 19.2 , 33.1 , 38.1 , 52.1 , 59.1
ꢁ
ꢀ þ þ
2
4
20
2
, respectively (JCPDS card No. 04-0117) [43].
1
325 pA cm (3 keV He spectra). Ne ions with a kinetic en-
ꢁ
ꢀ
2
In addition, the diffraction peak at 2
q
¼ 44.4 corresponds to the
ergy of 5 keV were applied at a low ion flux of 1600 pA cm (5 keV
4
þ
ꢁ
(111) facet of fcc Ni (JCPDS card No. 04-0850) [44,45]. XRD patterns
indicate that Ni and Ni(OH) crystalline phases are present in Ni/C.
After ruthenium was supported on Ni/C (Fig. 1Ac), the intensity of
Ni(111) and Ni(OH) diffraction peaks decreased slightly. A possible
Ne spectra). The scattering angle was 145 . Scanning electron
2
microscopy (SEM) images and SEM-EDX spectra of the catalysts
were collected in a LEO-1530 scanning electron microscope.
2
reason for this is that ruthenium atoms replace some nickel atoms
during the synthesis of RuNi/C. Similar conclusions could be drawn
by analyzing the XRD patterns of the Ni/C, Pt/C and PtNi/C catalysts
2.4. Catalytic activity test
(Fig. 1B). Fig. 1C shows the XRD patterns of Ni/C, PtRu/C and PtRuNi/
The catalytic performance of as-synthesized catalysts for quin-
C. Only the characteristic diffraction peaks of Ni(OH) and Ni appear
2
oline hydrogenation was tested in an MS-50-316 L stainless steel
autoclave. In the experiment, 10 mL ethanol quinoline solution
in Fig. 1C, while the characteristic diffraction peaks associated with
Ru and Pt are not observed. This is probably because Ru and Pt are
(
0.69 wt%) and 0.0500 g catalyst was placed in the autoclave. After
2
coated on Ni/Ni(OH) nanoparticles in the form of particles too
the reaction device was installed, air in the reactor was replaced
small to be observed or as an amorphous coating.
with hydrogen, the reactor was then filled with hydrogen until the
Fig. 2 displays a HAADF-STEM image of PtRuNi/C (Fig. 2a) and
shows the size distribution of PtRuNi nanoparticles (Fig. 2b). It
demonstrates that the PtRuNi nanoparticles are highly dispersed on
the catalyst support (carbon black). Fig. 2b shows that PtRuNi
nanoparticles with an average diameter of 6.52 nm are obtained
and that the particle size distribution is narrow with small particle
size.
To further explore the nanostructure and morphology of the
catalyst, the PtRuNi/C catalyst was observed by TEM. The four TEM
images in Fig. 3 show the PtRuNi/C catalyst at various magnifica-
tions. In the TEM images of PtRuNi/C, many small black spots can be
observed on the surface of the support (Fig. 3a and b), and the
distribution of the PtRuNi metal nanoparticles is seen to be very
uniform.
ꢀ1
pressure reached 5.0 MPa and the stirring rate reached 870 r min
.
The reaction was conducted at the specified temperature (e.g.,
ꢁ
1
00 C) for a defined period of time (e.g., 1 h). When the reaction
was finished, the sample was quickly cooled to room temperature.
The filtered liquid products were analyzed by gas chromatography
on Shimadzu system using a DB-35 (60 m ꢂ 0.32 mm) capillary
column and a flame ionization detector (FID), and the products
were identified by gas chromatography ~ mass spectrometry using
a Shimadzu system.
The catalytic properties of as-obtained catalysts were deter-
mined by calculating their conversion, selectivity and turnover
frequency (TOF). The Pt and Ru metal loadings were determined by
ICP-MS and the metal atoms were equally distributed on the sur-
face of catalysts. According to the literature [41,42], the dispersion
of the PtRu nanoparticles was calculated according to the equation
below. The Pt and Ru metal loadings were determined by ICP-MS,
and the metal atoms were found to be equally distributed on the
surface of the catalysts.
Typical SEM images of the PtRuNi/C and RuNi/C catalysts and
their SEM-EDX spectra are shown in Fig. 4. The images show that
PtRuNi and RuNi nanoparticles are too small to be detected by SEM,
demonstrating that the metallic nanoparticles are highly dispersed.
To further investigate the distribution of elements in the catalysts,