View Article Online
Table 2 Hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde using various catalyst systemsa
Pressure/MPa
Selectivity (%)
Catalyst
precursor
Solvent
system
Conversion
(%)
Run Reaction type
Ligand
scCO
2
H
2
UOL
SAL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
a
Homogeneous
Homogeneous
Biphasic
Biphasic
Biphasic
Biphasic
SAPC
RuCl
RuCl
RuCl
RuCl
RhCl
3
3
3
3
3
PPh
PPh
3
toluene
—
140
—
140
140
140
—
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
29
1.5
11
38
35
22
13
44
92
89
92
99
—
—
93
96
8
11
8
3
scCO
toluene–water
2
TPPTS
TPPTS
TPPTS
TPPTS
TPPTS
TPPTS
scCO
scCO
scCO
2
2
2
–water
–water
–water
0.5
100
100
7
Pd(OAc)
2
RuCl
RuCl
3
toluene–water
scCO –water
SAPC
3
2
140
4
3
Reaction conditions: Catalyst precursor: 0.012 mmol; ligand/Ru: 8; T = 40 °C; cinnamaldehyde: 7.8 mmol; toluene (for 1,3,7): 25 cm ; time: 2 h; water:
3
0.5 cm ; silica (for 7,8): 1.5 g.
by using flourous substituents.12 Biphasic catalytic
–water (runs 4–6) give much better
conversion than conventional biphasic reactions (11 to 38%)
and normal homogenous modes of operation (29 to 38%). This
catalyst system differs from conventional gas–liquid and gas–
liquid–liquid catalytic hydrogenation, since gas–liquid and gas–
liquid–liquid mass transfer are completely eliminated in the
back pressure regulator. The reaction was started by stirring the mixture
with a magnetic stirrer and continued for 2 h. After reaction, the pressure
was released and the reaction mixture was analyzed via GC (Shimadzu GC-
scCO
systems such as scCO
2
2
8
A, Ucon Oil 8HB 2000 Uniport B, 6 m). Details of the experimental
apparatus and procedures are described elsewhere (ref. 14).
1
Chem. Rev., 1999, 99; G. Kaupp, Angew. Chem., 1994, 106, 1519;
Angew Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 1452; M. Poliakoff, S. M.
Howdle and S. G. Kazarian, Angew. Chem., 1995, 107, 1409; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 1275; P. G. Jessop, T. Ikaria and R.
Noyori, Science, 1995, 269, 1065.
case of scCO
supercritical mixture of H
is 3.2 M, while the concentration of H
pressure is only 0.4 M.13 This property of scCO
2
as solvent. The concentration of hydrogen in a
(85 bar) and CO (120 bar) at 50 °C
in THF under the same
allows a
2
2
2
2
2 P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Nature, 1994, 368, 231; A.
Furstner, D. Koch, K. Langemann, W. Leitner and C. Six, Angew
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 2466; J. W. Rathke, R. J. Klingler and
T. R. Krause, Organometallics, 1991, 10, 1350.
reduction in viscosity and an increase in diffusion rate as
compared with the liquid phase, so that transport to and from the
catalyst phase is no longer a limiting factor. This causes
significant rate enhancement as observed in Table 2 and might
3
Applied Homogeneous Catalysis by Organometallic Complexes, ed. B.
Cornils and W. A. Herrmann, VCH, Weinheim, 1996; B. Cornils, W. A.
Herrmann and R. W. Eckl, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1997, 116 27; W. A.
Herrmann and B. Cornils, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36,
be advantageous in improving selectivity performance. RuCl
as metal precursor gives 99% selectivity towards UOL (run 4),
while RhCl and Pd(OAc) give 100% selectivity towards SAL.
3
3
2
1
048.
Earlier investigators have already examined this feature.
Supported aqueous phase catalysis (SAPC) in which the metal
complex is supported on a solid surface like silica has been
successfully used for biphasic reactions which have substrate
4
R. M. Deshpande, Purwanto, H. Delmas and R. V. Chaudhari, Ind.
Chem. Eng. Res., 1996, 35, 3927; Purwanto and H. Delmas, Catal.
Today, 1995, 24, 135.
5 H. Ding and B. E. Hanson, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 2747;
H. Ding, B. E. Hanson and J. Bakos, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995,
2
solubility limitations. SAPC can also be used in scCO as
3
4, 1645.
solvent and better activity and selectivity were observed when
compared with toluene as solvent (12.4 to 44%). Although the
application of SAPC is not particularly attractive in the case of
hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde (since it has finite solubility
in the catalyst phase), it may be more attractive in the case of
water insoluble substrates.
6
7
R. V. Chaudhari, B. M. Bhanage, R. M. Deshpande and H. Delmas,
Nature, 1995, 373, 501; US Pat. 5498801 (1996); 5650546 (1997).
J. P. Arhancet, M. E. Davis, J. S. Merola and B. E. Hanson, Nature, 1989
3
39, 454; J. P. Arhancet, M. E. Davis, J. S. Merola and B. E. Hanson,
J. Catal., 1990, 121, 327.
8 K. T. Wan and M. E. Davis, Nature, 1994, 370, 449.
In conclusion, scCO
2
–water was shown to be a good
9 P. Gallezot and D. Richard, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 1998, 40, 81 and
references cited therein; V. Ponec, Appl. Catal. A., 1997, 149, 27.
0 M. Arai, H. Takahashi, M. Shirai, Y. Nishiyama and T. Ebina, Appl.
Catal. A., 1999, 176, 229; M. Arai, A. Obata, K. Usui, M. Shirai and Y.
Nishiyama, Appl. Catal. A., 1996, 146, 381; M. Arai, K. Usui, M. Shrai
and Y. Nishiyama, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1995, 91, 923; M. Arai, K.
Usui and Y. Nishiyama, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1993, 1853.
1 J. M. Grosselin, C. Mercier, G. Allmang and F. Grass, Organometallics,
alternative solvent system for conventional biphasic catalytic
systems. This eliminates gas–liquid–liquid mass transfer limita-
tions due to the very high solubility of reactant gases in
1
2
scCO .
We thank the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS)
for financial support.
1
1
991, 10, 2126; M. Hernandez and P. Kalck, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1997, 116,
1
17 and 130; A. J. Carrasquel, J. Marino, F. A. Lopez, D. E. Paez, I.
Notes and references
Rojas and N. Valecia, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1997, 116, 157; F. Joo, J.
Kovacs, A. C. Benyei and A. Katho, Catal. Today, 1998, 42, 441.
†
Typical experimental procedure for an experiment involving the scCO
2
–
water biphasic catalytic system is as follows: RuCl (0.012 mmol) and
TPPTS (0.096 mmol) dissolved in water (0.5 cm ) were charged to a 50 cm
3
12 D. Koch and W. Leitner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 13398; D. R.
Palo and C. Erkey, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1998, 37, 4203.
13 Hydrogen and Deuterium, ed. C. L. Young, Solubility Data Series,
Pergamon, Oxford, 1981, vol. 5/6.
14 Y. Ikushima, N. Saito, K. Hatakeda, S. Ito, M. Arai and K. Arai, Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res., 1992, 31 569; Y. Ikushima, N. Saito and M. Arai,
J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 2293.
3
3
reactor maintained at 40 °C. Hydrogen (10 bar) was introduced into the
reactor and left for 1 h. Cinnamaldehyde (7.8 mmol) was introduced into the
reactor after depressurizing the hydrogen. Hydrogen (40 bar) and liquid
carbon dioxide were subsequently introduced into the reactor using a
JASCO Model 880-PU syringe pump and compressed to the desired
pressure (180 bar). The pump delivered the CO
ml min . Pressure control was achieved using a JASCO Model 880-81
2
at a flow rate of 3.5
21
Communication 9/03528A
1278
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1277–1278