7638
X. Tong et al. / Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 7634–7639
ꢀ
were obtained under 0.3 MPa at 80 C for 5 h. In oxidation
of styrene, a 77% conversion and 69% selectivity for benz-
Supplementary data
ꢀ
aldehyde were obtained under 0.3 MPa at 80 C for 10 h.
The detailed investigations about reaction mechanisms and
radical intermediates are underway.
It contains general procedure for the detailed GC measure-
ment conditions, explanation to several phenomena, and
GC–MS diagrams for all the products. Supplementary data
4. Experimental
4
.1. Reagents and equipments
References and notes
NHPI, anthraquinone (AQ), and anthraquinone derivates
were purchased from commercial source and purified before
they were employed.
1
2
. Cainelli, G.; Cardillo, G. Chromium Oxidation in Organic
Chemistry; Springer: Berlin, 1984.
. Hudlicky, M. Oxidations in Organic Chemistry; ACS
Monographs 186; American Chemical Society: Washington,
DC, 1990.
. Trost, B. M. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis (Oxidation);
Pergamon: New York, NY, 1991.
. Smith, A. B.; Konopelski, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 4094–
Cyclohexene, styrene, and other olefins were rectified before
they were used as reaction substrates.
3
All of the solvents including CH CN, CCl , PhCF , and
4
3
3
4
0
DMAc (N,N -dimethylacetamide) were analytical reagents.
4
. Muzart, J. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 113–140.
095.
5
6
The products of oxidation were determined by an Agilent
. Medina, J. C.; Gabriunas, N.; Pfiez-Mozo, E. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 1997, 115, 233–239.
. Niassary, M. S.; Farzaneh, F.; Ghandi, M.; Turkian, L. J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 157, 183–188.
6
4
890N GC/5973 MS detector and analyzed by an Agilent
890D gas chromatography.
7
8
4
.2. Oxidation of olefins
. Po1towicz, J.; Serwicka, E. M.; Bastardo-Gonzalez, E.;
Jones, W.; Mokaya, R. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2001, 218,
4
.2.1. General procedure for the oxidation of olefins. All
2
11–217.
oxidation experiments were performed in a closed Teflon-
lined stainless steel autoclave equipped with magnetic stir-
ring and automatic temperature control. Typical procedure
for cyclohexene oxidation was as follows: acetonitrile
9
. Salavati-Niasari, M.; Farzaneh, F.; Ghandi, M. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 2002, 186, 101–107.
1
0. Tong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Xia, C. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
006, 249, 47–52.
1. Lei, Z. React. Funct. Polym. 2000, 43, 139–143.
2
(
(
10 mL) solution of the freshly distilled 1 (2.0 mL), NHPI
5.0 mol %), and DADCAQ (1.25 mol%) were charged
1
1
2. Boghaei, D. M.; Mohebi, S. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 5357–
into the reactor. The atmosphere inside was replaced with
oxygen before the reactor was airproofed. Under stirring,
the autoclave was preheated to 75 C and then oxygen was
5
366.
3. Maurya, M. R.; Kumar, A. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006, 250,
90–198.
4. Sakthivel, A.; Dapurkar, S. E.; Selvam, P. Appl. Catal. A: Gen.
003, 246, 283–293.
5. Mukherjee, S.; Samanta, S.; Chandra Roy, B.; Bhaumik, A.
Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2006, 301, 79–88.
6. Salavati-Niasari, M.; Banitaba, S. H. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
1
1
1
1
1
ꢀ
1
charged to 0.3 MPa and kept for 5 h. After the reaction,
the autoclave was cooled and excess gas was purged. The
products were analyzed with internal standard technique
by Agilent 4890D gas chromatography (OV-1701 capillary
column) with a flame ionization detector (all products
were determined on GC-MC with Agilent 6890N GC/5973
MS detector).
2
2
003, 201, 43–54.
7. Serwicka, E. M.; Po1towicz, J.; Bahranowski, K.;
Olejniczak, Z.; Jones, W. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2004, 275,
4
.2.2. Special analysis procedure for the oxidation of
9
–14.
olefins. The analysis procedure for oxidation of cyclohexene:
after 1 was oxidized, the 4 could decompose to 2 when the
oxidized mixture was injected into gas chromatography;
hereby, to quantify the selectivity of the different products
in the oxidation of 1, the reaction mixture was treated with
excess Ph P for 1 h after the first GC measurement and
3
was analyzed again. Here, Ph P could reduce quantitatively
3
the 4 to 3 at room temperature, so the selectivity of the oxy-
genated products could be accurately attained after a second
GC measurement.
1
1
2
2
2
2
8. Salavati-Niasari, M.; Salemi, P.; Davar, F. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 2005, 238, 215–222.
9. Salavati-Niasari, M.; Hassani-Kabutarkhani, M.; Davar, F.
Catal. Commun. 2006, 7, 955–962.
0. Kim, S.; Zhang, W.; Pinnavaia, T. J. Catal. Lett. 1997, 43,
1
1. Nickerson, D. P.; Harford-Cross, C. F.; Fulcher, S. R.; Wong,
49–154.
L. L. FEBS Lett. 1997, 405, 153–159.
ꢀ
2. Zsigmond, A.; Horv ꢀa th, A.; Notheisz, F. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 2001, 171, 95–102.
3. Liu, J.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Chang, W.; Huang, A. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 2002, 187, 163–167.
Acknowledgements
24. Freitag, J.; N €u chter, M.; Ondruschka, B. Green Chem. 2003, 5,
91–295.
2
This work was financially supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China.
25. Kurek, S. S.; Michorczyk, P.; Balisz, A. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
2003, 194, 237–248.