Organic Process Research & Development 2000, 4, 270−274
Vanadium-Catalysed Oxidative Bromination Using Dilute Mineral Acids and
Hydrogen Peroxide: An Option for Recycling Waste Acid Streams
Gadi Rothenberg and James H. Clark*
York Green Chemistry Group, Clean Technology Centre, Chemistry Department, The UniVersity of York,
Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Abstract:
can reduce these risks. Several recent publications2a,4 cite
toxicity of Br and HBr as the incentive to investigate various
complex oxybromination reagents, but, in real life, two
situations have to be distinguished: (a) When molecular
bromine is available on-site (as in the Dead Sea Works in
Israel, for example), it is the cheapest and most enViron-
mentally friendly bromination reagent. Used in conjunction
Vanadium pentoxide, V
2 5
O
, catalyses the two-electron oxidation
2
-
+
of Br to Br , using aqueous hydrogen peroxide under dilute
acidic conditions. In this system, kinetic studies show that HBr
can be replaced with a combination of an alkali bromide salt
(NaBr, KBr) and a dilute mineral acid (e.g., HCl, H
2 4 3
SO , HNO ,
H
3
PO ). The salt/acid/peroxide system may be used for in situ
4
or ex situ oxidative bromination, e.g. of various aromatic
compounds. The application of the above concept towards the
recycling of industrial acid waste is discussed. The cost ef-
fectiveness, E factors, and hazard factors for several bromina-
tion and oxidative bromination reagent systems are compared.
with H
+ Br w 2 ArBr + 2 H
reagent has to shipped to the site, only four reagents are
2
O
2
, the stoichiometry would then be H
2
O
2
+ 2 ArH
1a
2
2
O. (b) When a bromine-containing
cheap enough to matter for large-scale manufacturing: Br
HBr (48% aqueous), KBr, and NaBr.
2
,
Obviously, it is much safer and cheaper to transport and
store large quantities of alkali bromide salts (NaBr, KBr)
Introduction
than either Br
2
or HBr. The drawback is that oxidation of
Bromination of organic compounds is one of the reactions
performed today on a very large scale, often resulting in
stoichiometric pollutant streams. Classical bromination of
aromatics, for example, utilizes only 50% of the halogen,
with the other half forming HBr waste (eq 1).
bromide to bromine requires acidic conditions (eq 2), so that
in the reaction H O + 2 Br w 2 BrO + 2 OH , only
2 2
small amounts of hypobromite are produced.
-
-
-
Although it is known that enzymes such as vanadium
bromoperoxidase (VBPO) catalyse brominations under sea-
5
water conditions, large-scale enzymatic bromination is
ArH + Br f ArBr + HBr
(1)
6
2
problematic. A more realistic industrial option in the near
future, would be to use simple catalysts and in-plant existing
technologies, especially considering the tight profit margins
associated with large-scale halogenation. For example, glacial
acetic acid was used, together with KBr and Mo(VI), to effect
Theoretically, it is possible to reoxidise the HBr, e.g. with
, and achieve high bromine utilization, between 90 and
2 2
H O
1
95% (eq 2).
4
b
oxybromination of various activated aromatics. An analo-
gous investigation using nitric acid and metal chloride salts,
however, required a 10-fold molar excess of acid and salt
2
HBr + H O f Br +2H O
(2)
2
2
2
2
Thus, activated aromatics, such as phenols, anisoles, and
7,3
for the oxidative chlorination of acetanilide.
2
anilines, may be oxybrominated without a catalyst, while
inactive (benzene, toluene) but not deactivated (e.g., ni-
trobenzene) ones, have been oxybrominated in the presence
of quaternary ammonium salts. In practice, however, HBr
recycling is rarely performed in industrial plants, as the
additional step and the corrosiveness of HBr necessitate
2
reactor costs that exceed those of purchasing more Br .
(
4) (a) Barhate, N. B.; Gajare, A. S.; Wakharkar, R. D.; Bedekar, A. V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6349-6350. (b) Choudary, B. M.; Sudha, Y.;
Reddy, P. N. Synlett 1994, 450.
3
(5) For a recent review, see Butler, A.; Walker, J. V. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93,
1937-1944.
(
6) Enzymatic oxybromination processes are popular research subjects, and
several novel ideas have been published. See, for example: (a) Sels, B.;
De Vos, D.; Butinx, M.; Pierard, F.; Kirsch-De Mesmaeker, A.; Jacobs, P.
Nature 1999, 400, 855-857. (b) Bhattacharjee, M.; Ganguly, S.; Mukherjee,
J. J. Chem. Res. (S) 1995, 80-81. (c) Martinez-Perez, J. A.; Pickel, M. A.;
Caroff, E.; Woggon, W.-D. Synlett 1999, 1875-1878. However, imple-
mentation of enzymatic processes has serious drawbacks, not least because
such reactions are carried out in very dilute solutions, and thus require
enormous reaction tanks, meaning high capital costs in a market where the
current technology is well-established and retains size advantage. Several
VBPO mimics have been reported, but it is unlikely that in the near future
they would lead to an enzymatic oxybromination process, which would have
to compete on a very narrow profit margin.
Transportation and storage of large quantities of molecular
bromine and HBr is extremely hazardous. Bromide recycling
*
Author for correspondence. E-mail: jhc1@york.ac.uk.
(
1) (a) Johnson, R.; Reeve K. Spec. Chem. 1992, 11, 292-299. (b) Ho, T.-L.;
Gupta, B. G. B.; Olah, G. A. Synthesis 1977, 676-677. (c) For a recent
monograph see Jones, C. W. Applications of Hydrogen Peroxide and
Derivatives; In RSC Clean Technology Monographs; Clark, J. H., Ed.; Royal
Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 1999; pp 59-61.
(
2) (a) Barhate, N. B.; Gajare, A. S.; Wakharkar, R. D.; Bedekar, A. V.
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 11127-11142. (b) Mukhopadhyay, S.; Ananthakrish-
nan, S.; Chandalia, S. B. Org. Process Res. DeV. 1999, 3, 451-454. (c)
L u¨ bbecke, H.; Boldt, P. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1577-1579.
(7) (a) Jerzy, G.; Slawomir, Z. Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 3291-3299.
Generally, for oxychlorination a large excess of HCl is required, see: (b)
Thirumalai, P.; Bhatt, M. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 33, 3099-3100. (c)
Mukhopadhyay, S.; Chandalia, S. B. Org. Process Res. DeV. 1999, 3, 10-
16.
(3) Dakka, J.; Sasson, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987, 1421-1422.
2
70
•
Vol. 4, No. 4, 2000 / Organic Process Research & Development
10.1021/op000020l CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society and The Royal Society of Chemistry
Published on Web 06/17/2000