Job/Unit: O21008
/KAP1
Date: 03-09-12 12:00:12
Pages: 6
T. Hirashita, Y. Suzuki, H. Tsuji, Y. Sato, K. Naito, S. Araki
SHORT COMMUNICATION
the stereochemical outcome of the propargylation? The Acknowledgments
phosphane ligands might no longer be able to exist on the
allenyl/propargyl indium reagents provided that the trans-
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Cul-
mechanism of the palladium-catalyzed umpolung allyl- ture, Japan (No. 14340195).
metalation is completed. In connection with our study, the
[
12]
[13]
ation
and propargylation
using Et Zn or Et B might
2 3
be helpful for understanding the present reaction. Recently,
η -allylpalladium species are proposed as intermediates for
the enantioselective allylations that cannot be reconciled
1
[1] a) S. Araki, T. Hirashita in Main Group Metals in Organic Syn-
thesis Vol. 1 (Eds.: H. Yamamoto, K. Oshima), Wiley, New
York, 2004, pp. 323–386; b) S. Araki, T. Hirashita in Compre-
hensive Organometallic Chemistry III (Eds.: R. Crabtree, M.
Mingos), Elsevier, Oxford, 2007, pp. 649–751.
with the initially proposed mechanism involving allylic zinc
or allylic boron reagents through transmetalation.[
14,15]
Di-
metallic Pd–Zn complexes have also been proposed for [2] a) J. A. Marshall, L. M. McNulty, D. Zou, J. Org. Chem. 1999,
propargylation by a computational study.[
16]
64, 5193–5200; b) S. Araki, T. Kamei, T. Hirashita, H. Yama-
mura, M. Kawai, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 847–849.
A similar
mechanism based on the umpolung of the propargylnickel
intermediates under the influence of low-valent indium is
apparently a plausible explanation for the present reaction.
The preferred stereochemical mode of propargylation
[
3] a) U. Anwar, R. Grigg, M. Rasprini, V. Savic, V. Sridharan,
Chem. Commun. 2000, 645–646; b) U. Anwar, R. Grigg, V.
Sridharan, Chem. Commun. 2000, 933–934; c) I. R. Cooper, R.
Grigg, W. S. MacLachlan, M. Thornton-Petta, V. Sridharana,
Chem. Commun. 2002, 1372–1373; d) L. a. T. Cleghorn, I. R.
Cooper, R. Grigg, W. S. MacLachlan, V. Sridharan, J. Or-
ganomet. Chem. 2003, 687, 483–493; e) L. a. T. Cleghorn, I. R.
Cooper, R. Grigg, W. S. MacLachlan, V. Sridharan, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 2003, 44, 7969–7973; f) I. R. Cooper, R. Grigg, M. J.
Hardie, W. S. MacLachlan, V. Sridharan, W. A. Thomas, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2283–2285; g) I. R. Cooper, R. Grigg,
W. S. MacLachlan, V. Sridharana, M. Thornton-Petta, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 2003, 44, 403–405; h) L. a. T. Cleghorn, R. Grigg,
C. Kilner, W. S. MacLachlan, V. Sridharan, Chem. Commun.
with allenyl/propargyl metals depends on the intrinsic prop-
erties of the counter metal and the circumstances.[
17,18]
Al-
though
a general approach to anti-homopropargylic
alcohols, including the Pd-catalyzed InI-mediated proparg-
ylation, has been well established, little is known about
accessing syn isomers. The present propargylation provides
a facile and efficient route to these compounds by using
only nickel catalysts instead of palladium catalysts, which
give the anti isomers predominantly.
2
005, 3071–3073; i) R. Grigg, S. McCaffrey, V. Sridharan,
C. W. G. Fishwick, C. Kilner, S. Korn, K. Bailey, J. Blacker,
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 12159–12171; j) L. a. T. Cleghorn, R.
Grigg, V. Savic, M. Simic, Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 8731–8737; k)
R. Grigg, J. Blacker, C. Kilner, S. McCaffrey, V. Savic, V. Srid-
haran, Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 8177–8181.
Conclusions
[
[
4] C. H. Ding, X. L. Hou, Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1914–1937.
5] a) T. P. Loh, M. J. Lin, K. L. Tan, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
In summary, we have developed the InI-mediated syn-
selective propargylation of carbonyl compounds with pro-
pargyl carbonates in the presence of Ni catalysts. The pres-
ent Ni-catalyzed propargylation proved to have a different
5
07–509; b) M.-J. Lin, T.-P. Loh, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
13042–13043; c) W. Miao, L. W. Chung, W. Yun-Dong, T. H.
Chan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13326–13334; d) D. Seo-
moon, J. A, P. H. Lee, Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2401–2404.
0
nature than either the In -mediated or the Pd-catalyzed InI-
[
6] a) J. A. Marshall, C. M. Grant, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 696–
mediated reactions. Further applications of this propargyl-
ation reaction are currently under study.
697; b) J. A. Marshall, C. M. Grant, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
8214–8219; c) J. A. Marshall, H. R. Chobanian, J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 8357–8360; d) J. A. Marshall, B. A. Johns, J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 1501–1510; e) J. A. Marshall, P. Eidam, H. S.
Eidam, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4840–4844; f) J. A. Marshall,
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8153–8166.
Experimental Section
[
7] T. Hirashita, S. Kambe, H. Tsuji, H. Omori, S. Araki, J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 5054–5059.
8] T. Hirashita, S. Kambe, H. Tsuji, S. Araki, Chem. Commun.
2006, 2595–2597.
[9] K. Furuta, M. Ishiguro, R. Haruta, N. Ikeda, H. Yamamoto,
Typical Experimental Procedure: To a mixture of Ni(acac)
pared by heating Ni(acac) ·2H O (15 mg, 0.05 mmol) under re-
duced pressure, was added PPh (53 mg, 0.2 mmol), indium(I) iod-
2
, pre-
2
2
[
3
ide (121 mg, 0.50 mmol) in THF (1.0 mL), methyl 4-phenylbut-3-
yn-2-yl carbonate (1d; 90 μL, 0.50 mmol), and benzaldehyde
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1984, 57, 2768–2776.
10] a) M. Yasuda, M. Haga, A. Baba, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
[
(26 μL, 0.25 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room tem-
5
513–5517; b) M. Yasuda, M. Haga, A. Baba, Organometallics
perature under an atmosphere of argon for 1 d and then quenched
with dilute hydrochloric acid (1 m). The product was extracted with
diethyl ether and washed with aqueous saturated sodium hydrogen
carbonate, water, and brine. The organic layer was dried with anhy-
drous sodium sulfate, and the solvent was removed under reduced
pressure. The residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel
2009, 28, 1998–2000.
[
[
11] G. C. Lloyd-Jones, T. Russell, Synlett 1998, 903–905.
12] Y. Tamaru, A. Tanaka, K. Yasui, S. Goto, S. Tanaka, Angew.
Chem. 1995, 107, 862; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34,
787–789.
[
13] Y. Tamaru, S. Goto, A. Tanaka, M. Shimizu, M. Kimura, An-
(
(
EtOAc/hexane = 1:5) to give 2-methyl-1,4-diphenylbut-3-yn-1-ol
3d; 58 mg, 96%, syn/anti = 87:13).
gew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 879–880.
[14] G. P. Howell, A. J. Minnaard, B. L. Feringa, Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2006, 4, 1278–1283.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): General methods, assignment of syn/anti isomers, experimen-
tal procedures, spectroscopic data of the products, and copies of
[
15] S.-F. Zhu, X.-C. Qiao, Y.-Z. Zhang, L.-X. Wang, Q.-L. Zhou,
Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1135.
[16] R. Álvarez, A. R. D. Lera, J. M. Aurrecoechea, A. Durana, Or-
ganometallics 2007, 26, 2799–2802.
1
the H NMR spectra.
4
www.eurjoc.org
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 0000, 0–0