2
86 Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 78, No. 2 (2005)
Direct Ortho-Acylation of Phenols
Table 2. Acylation of 1 mmol of p-Cresol with Organic Acids by 0.83 mmol of BF3
bÞ
Entry
aÞ
Acid
mmol of acid
Time/min
Power/W
Yield /%
1
CH3CO2H
C2H5CO2H
C3H7CO2H
C4H9CO2H
PhCO2H
1.2
1.3
1.08
0.95
1.6
1.83
2.5
2
2
2
800
600
700
600
600
98
98
95
98
95
2
3
4
5
a) By 0.21 mmol of BF3. b) Isolated yields.
ꢃ 18 ꢃ
2
-Acetyl-1-naphthol: mp 98–100 C (lit. mp 98 C); IR
ꢂ1
OH
OH
O
1
(
2.6 (s, 3H), 7.5–8.3 (m, 6H), 13.8 (s, 1H).
KBr) ꢁ (cm ): 3300–3600, 1625, 1570; H NMR (CDCl3) ꢀ
BF
3
.(C
2
H
5
)
2
O
R
+
2
RCO H
MW
ꢂ1
1
-Acetyl-2-naphthol: IR (neat) ꢁ (cm ): 3200–3500, 1725,
1
1
1
675; H NMR (CDCl3) ꢀ 2.6 (s, 3H), 7.5–8.0 (m, 6H), 13.8 (s,
H).
CH
3
CH
3
R=CH3,
C
2
H
5
, C
3
H
7
, C
4
H
9
, ph
21
1
-(2-Hydroxy-3-methylphenyl)-1-ethanone:
ꢂ1
oil, (lit. bp
1
ꢃ
8
(
2–84 C) IR (KBr) ꢁ (cm ): 3200–3500, 1650, 1600; H NMR
Scheme 2.
CDCl3) ꢀ 2.2 (s, 3H), 2.6 (s, 3H), 7.5–7.8 (m, 3H), 12.1 (s, 1H).
1
26
glet peak with ꢀ 11.8–13.8 ppm in the H NMR data from all
of the products, is completely consistent with the ortho-acylat-
ed phenols and naphthols.
1-(2-Hydroxy-4-methylphenyl)-1-ethanone:
ꢂ1
oil, (lit. bp
1
ꢃ
82–84 C) IR (KBr) ꢁ (cm ): 3200–3500, 1600, 1670; H NMR
(CDCl3) ꢀ 1.8 (s, 3H), 2.0 (s, 3H), 6.2–7.0 (m, 3H), 11.8 (s, 1H).
ꢃ
In order to develop the use of BF3 in the acylation reaction,
we used various organic acids in the acylation reaction of p-
cresol in the presence of BF3 (C2H5)2O under microwave irra-
1-(2-Hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)-1-ethanone: mp 42–44
C
ꢃ
ꢂ1
(
1
3
lit.17 mp 43–44 C) IR (KBr) ꢁ (cm ): 3300–3500, 1650,
1
775; H NMR (CDCl3) ꢀ 2.2 (s, 3H), 2.4 (s, 3H), 6.8–7.4 (m,
H), 11.8 (s, 1H).
ꢁ
diation and solvent-free conditions (Scheme 2).
1
-(2-Hydroxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1-ethanone:
ꢂ1
oil, IR
The results are given in Table 2. It was considered that the
yields of the reaction products were excellent for acylation re-
actions with all of the various organic acids.
In conclusion, this new method for the acylation of phenol
and naphthol derivatives has some advantages, such as: sim-
plicity of the reaction, very high yields of the products, a short
reaction time, and simplicity of the work-up. In these reac-
tions, ortho aryl alkyl ketones were regioselectively yielded
as the products under efficient, mild, and solvent-free
conditions.
1
(
2
KBr) ꢁ (cm ): 2900–3450, 1770–1650; H NMR (CDCl3) ꢀ
.4 (s, 3H), 2.5 (s, 3H), 2.8 (s, 2H), 7.5 (d, 2H), 12.6 (s, 1H).
ꢃ
17
1
-(2,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-1-ethanone: mp 143–145 C (lit.
ꢃ
ꢂ1
mp 144–146 C) IR (KBr) ꢁ (cm ): 3000–3500, 1620, 1570;
1
H NMR (CDCl3) ꢀ 2.7 (s, 3H), 6.4 (s, 1H), 7.3–7.7 (m, 3H),
1
2.8 (s, 1H).
1
ꢂ1
-(2,3-Dihydroxyphenyl)-1-ethanone:
oil, IR (KBr) ꢁ
cm ): 3100–3600, 1620, 1490; H NMR (CDCl3) ꢀ 2.8 (s,
H), 6.0 (s, 1H), 6.8–7.6 (m, 3H), 12.4 (s, 1H).
-(2,5-Dihydroxyphenyl)-1-ethanone: mp 197–199 C (lit.
1
(
3
ꢃ
17
1
ꢃ
ꢂ1
mp 198–200 C) IR (KBr) ꢁ (cm ): 3100–3250, 1620, 1500–
Experimental
1
1
(
580; H NMR (DMSO-d6) ꢀ 2.4 (s, 3H), 6.8–7.3 (m, 3H), 8.7
s, 1H), 11.4 (s, 1H).
1-(2-Hydroxyphenyl)-1-ethanone: oil, (lit. bp 213 C) IR
Chemicals were purchased from the Merck Chemical Company
in high purity. BF3 was used in the reactions as BF3 (C2H5)2O,
boron trifluoride etherate (50%). IR spectra were recorded from
a KBr pellet on a Perkin-Elmer 781 spectrophotometer and an
23
ꢃ
ꢁ
ꢂ1
1
(
ꢀ
KBr) ꢁ (cm ): 2600–3300, 1650, 1490; H NMR (DMSO-d6)
2.5 (s, 3H), 6.7 (s, 1H), 6.8–7.6 (m, 4H).
1
1
Impact 400 Nickolet FT IR Spectrophotometer. H NMR were
-(2-Hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)-1-propanone: oil, IR (KBr)
ꢂ1
recorded in CDCl3 with (60 MHz) spectrometer using of TMS
as an internal reference. Melting points were obtained with a
Yanagimoto micro melting-point apparatus, and are uncorrected.
Purity determinations of the substrates and reaction monitoring
were accomplished by TLC on silica-gel polygram SILG/UV
54 plates.
General Procedure for the Acylation Reaction. In the gen-
eral procedure, a mixture of 1 mmol of phenolic or 0.7 mmol of
naphtholic compound, BF3 (C2H5)2O, and 1.2 mmol acetic acid,
1
ꢁ
(
(cm ): 3200, 1720, 1620; H NMR (CDCl3) ꢀ 1.0 (t, 3H), 2.0
s, 3H), 2.6 (q, 2H), 6.5–7.2 (m, 3H), 11.9 (s, 1H).
1
ꢂ1
-(2-Hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)-1-butanone: oil, IR (KBr) ꢁ
cm ): 3300, 1730, 1620; H NMR (CDCl3) ꢀ 1.2 (t, 3H), 1.7 (q,
1
(
2
H), 2.3 (s, 3H), 6.7–7.0 (m, 3H), 7.2 (s, 1H), 11.9 (s, 1H).
1
2
-(2-Hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)-1-pentanone: oil, IR (KBr)
ꢂ1
1
ꢁ
1
(cm ): 3250, 1730, 1630; H NMR (CDCl3) ꢀ 0.7 (t, 3H).
.4 (m, 4H), 2.0 (s, 3H), 2.6 (t, 2H), 6.4–7.0 (m, 3H), 7.2 (s, 1H).
ꢁ
reacted together under microwave irradiation, without any solvent
for a short time. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction
mixture was dissolved in dichloromethane (10 mL) and H2O
We are grateful to the University of Kashan Research Coun-
cil for the partial support of this work.
(
about 20 mL). After extraction of the organic phase, it was wash-
References
ed with aqueous NaHCO3 (20 mL), dried with CaCl2, filtered and
evaporated to give a crude product. The crude products were then
purified by chromatography on silica gel using petroleum ether as
the eluent. The products were confirmed by spectroscopic data and
physical methods by being consistent with the reported data.7
ˇ
1
E. Veverkov a´ , M. Meciarov a´ , B. Gotov, and S. Toma,
Green Chem., 4, 361 (2002).
2 L. F. Fieser and E. B. Hershberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 62, 49
(1940).
,23–28