J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2801-2808
2801
Ra d ica l Na tu r e of P a th w a ys to Alk en e a n d Ester fr om Th er m a l
Decom p osition of P r im a r y Alk yl Dia cyl P er oxid e
Lev R. Ryzhkov
Department of Chemistry, Towson State University, Baltimore, Maryland 21204
Received J uly 17, 1995 (Revised Manuscript Received J anuary 30, 1996X)
Thermal decomposition of a primary alkyl diacyl peroxide 2 is investigated. Dependence of product
yields on temperature, viscosity, and solvent polarity is examined in a variety of media. The excess
of the alkene disproportionation product 4 and the presence of ester 3 and acid 5 is argued to
demonstrate the existence of a discrete acyloxy-alkyl geminate radical pair. Stereoselective
1
deuterium labeling of 2 and subsequent H-NMR analysis of the resulting isotopomers of 4 confirm
the radical nature of detected decomposition products.
In tr od u ction
and by comparison with nuclear hyperfine frequencies
1
0
via measurement of CIDNP enhancement factors. These
studies indicate decarboxylation rate constants at 80 °C
Acyloxy radicals, 1, are reactive intermediates in
1
organic reactions ranging from the Barton and related
7
-1
of the order of 10 s , and an activation energy of 8-9
2
reactions, Hundsdiecker reactions to Kolbe electrolysis
kcal/mol.
and thermal or photodecomposition of diacyl peroxides
Much less certain is the decarboxylation rate of RCO
when R is primary, secondary, or tertiary alkyl or benzyl.
The acetoxy radical (R ) CH ) decarboxylation rate has
been estimated from product yields and CIDNP en-
•,
2
3
and other acyloxy derivatives. They also serve as
intermediates in generation and calibration of many of
the “radical clocks”.4
3
1
1
hancement factors12 to be 109
s
-1
at 80 °C with an
•
•
RCO2
R + CO2
activation energy of approximately 7 kcal/mol. Estimates
•
1
for the decarboxylation rate of RCO
CH , (CH CH, (CH C, PhCH , and PhCH
recently obtained by comparison with electron-transfer
2
with R ) CH
3
, CH
3
-
2
3
)
2
3
)
3
2
2
CH
2
were
The most obvious chemical property of these radicals
is the relative ease with which they undergo decarboxy-
lation to produce the corresponding R radical. Knowl-
edge of the rate of this reaction is not only of intrinsic
interest because of the simplicity of the process, but is
also essential if one is to understand fully the distribution
of radical-derived products formed from acyloxy radical
precursors. Determination of the electronic structures
of these species has also proven to present interesting
1
3
rates within the naphthylmethyl-acyloxy radical pairs,
.
assumed independent of the nature of R, and calibrated
by the known decarboxylation rate of 9-methylfluorenoyl-
oxy radical.14 However, the former investigation suggests
that the decarboxylation rate for the propanoyloxy radical
9
-1
is 2 × 10 s . This implies that it should be possible to
observe net CIDNP polarization in photolysis or ther-
molysis of dipropanoyl or other primary peroxides which
5
12
theoretical and experimental challenges.
is contrary to the results reported previously.
Decarboxylation rates of aroyloxy radicals (R ) sub-
stituted phenyl) have been measured, or estimated, by a
variety of methods including indirect comparison with
Without exception primary, secondary, or tertiary alkyl
or benzyl acyloxy radicals decarboxylate too rapidly to
maintain concentrations sufficient for direct detection
using currently available techniques. For example, only
alkyl radical pairs and radicals formed by H abstraction
trapping rates6 direct detection optically, or by EPR
,7
8
9
X
15
Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, March 15, 1996.
1) Barton, D. H. R. et al. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6937 and
from the alkyl chains or reactant molecules are seen
(
by EPR during photolysis of single crystals of bis-
decanoyl peroxide at 10-20 K. Furthermore, in many
cases products containing the acyloxy group have not
been detected during the thermal decomposition of diacyl
peroxides, as would be expected for recombination of
intermediate acyloxy-alkyl radical pair (Scheme 1). This
has given rise to an assumption that acyloxy radicals
references therein. See also Newcomb, M.; Dhanabalasingham, B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5193; Ziegler, F. E.; Harran, P. G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 4505. Ziegler, F. E.; Harran, P. G. J . Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 2768.
(
2) For reviews see Wilson, J . Org. React. 1957, 9, 332. See also
Skell, P. S.; May, D. D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 967.
3) (a) Hiatt, R. In Organic Peroxides; Swern, D., Ed.; Wiley-
(
Interscience: New York; 1971; Vol. II, p 799. (b) Koenig, T. In Free
Radicals; Kochi, J . K., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York; 1973; Vol.
I, Chapter 3.
•
•
which produce R more stable then CH
3
do not exist as
(
4) (a) Newcomb, M. Tetrahedron 1993, 49(6), 1151-1176. (b)
discrete chemical intermediates but undergo C-C bond
Newcomb, M.; Manek, M. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 114, 9662. (c)
Choi, S. Y.; Eaton, P. E.; Newcomb, M.; Yip, Y. C. Ibid. 1990, 114,
6
1
326. (d) Newcomb, M.; Varick, T.; Ha, C.; Manek, M. B.; Xu Yue. Ibid.
990, 114, 8158.
(10) (a) Schwerzel, R.; Lawler, R.; Evans, G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1974,
29, 106. (b) Den Hollander, J . Chem. Phys. 1975, 10, 167.
(11) Braun, W.; Rajerbach, L.; Eirich, F. J . Phys. Chem. 1962, 66,
1591.
(12) (a) Kaptein, R.; Brokken-Zijp, J .; de Kanter, F. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1972, 94, 6280. (b) Glazov, Y. et al. Russ. J . Appl. Spectr. 1978,
28, 607. (c) Turetskaya, E. et al. Dokl. Acad. Nauk BSSR 1980, 24,
57.
(5) (a) Feller, D.; Huyser, E. S.; Borden, W. T.; Davidson, E. R. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1459. (b) Feller, D.; Borden, W. T.;
Davidson, E. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 3347. (c) Rauk, A.; Yu,
D.; Armstrong, D. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8222.
(
(
6) Bevington, J . C.; Lewis, T. D. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1958, 94, 8236.
7) J anzen, E. G.; Evans, C. A.; Nishi, T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1972,
1
04, 4515.
8) (a) Chateauneuf, J .; Lusztyk, J .; Ingold, K. U. Ibid. 1988, 110,
877. (b) Ingold, K.; Lusztyc, J .; Chateanneuf, J . Ibid. 1988, 110, 2886.
9) Yamauchi, S.; Hirota, N.; Takahara, S.; Sakuragi, H.; Tokamaru,
K. Ibid. 1985, 107, 5021.
(13) Hilborn, J . W.; Pincock, J . A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2683.
(14) Falvey, D. E.; Schuster, G. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
7419.
(15) Karch, N. J .; Koh, E. T.; Whitsel, B. L.; McBride, J . M. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 6729.
(
2
(
0
022-3263/96/1961-2801$12.00/0 © 1996 American Chemical Society