The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Note
homogeneous catalytic systems (Table S1). Pure EtOH and i-
PrOH were also usable solvents, although the reactivity was
lower than that in the mixed alcohols (Table 1, entries 6 and 7).
In addition to the solvent, the electrode material is also an
important factor affecting electroorganic synthesis reactions.
Here, conventional metal and nonmetal materials are tested for
the enantioselective electroreduction of 2,2,2-trifluoroacetophe-
none (Table 2). Although a moderate yield can be obtained on a
very high at room temperature and normal pressure. As shown in
Figure 1, the ee value is higher than 90% when the charge
amount is larger than 0.25 F mol−1. However, unexpectedly, as
the charge amount decreases, the product yield does not
decrease linearly. The yield when the charge amount is 1 F mol−1
is almost the same as that when the charge amount is 2 F mol−1.
Even when the charge amount is only 0.5 F mol−1, which is a
quarter of the theoretical amount, the yield is as high as 93%
(isolated yield: 88%), and the corresponding current efficiency is
372%. A further decrease in charge amount will bring the current
efficiency close to 600%. These results are completely
inconsistent with the traditional electroreduction of aromatic
ketones, which requires two electrons. Meanwhile, a control
experiment without electricity was carried out. After stirring the
solution for 9 h (similar to the electrolysis time for charge
amount of 2 F mol−1) under room temperature and normal
pressure, the yield of the desired product was only 5%. It shows
that electrolysis is essential for this reaction process.
Table 2. Influence of Cathode on the Enantioselective
Electroreduction of 2,2,2-Trifluoroacetophenone with a Ru
a
Catalyst
b
b
entry
cathode
yield (%)
R ee (%)
1
2
3
4
GC
Ni
Cu
Pt
55
85
88
96
90
93
91
94
a
Reaction conditions: undivided cell, Mg anode, solvent (EtOH/i-
Is it possible that some intermediate generated by electrolysis
will trigger the target reaction? In other words, is it possible that
the electrogenerated intermediate can stably exist in the solution
and can catalyze the reaction under room temperature and
normal pressure? Therefore, a series of control experiments were
carried out. After electrolysis for a certain charge amount, the
current was disconnected, but the solution was continuously
stirred for the same time as previous electrolysis. For instance,
after electrolysis for a charge amount of 0.25 F mol−1
(corresponding to electrolysis for 67 min), the solution was
continuously stirred for another 67 min. Therefore, the total
reaction time is equivalent to that of the experiment, which is
electrolyzed for a charge amount of 0.5 F mol−1. As previously
guessed, if the electrogenerated intermediate can continuously
catalyze the target reaction, the reaction will continue for a
period of time even if the current is disconnected. However,
surprisingly, as shown in Figure 1, the continued stirring after
electrolysis had almost no effect on the yield. The yield depends
only on the electrolysis process.
PrOH = 1:1, 20 mL), TEAI (0.1 M), 2,2,2-trifluoroacetophenone (0.1
M), RuCl2[(R)-xylbinap][(R)-daipen] (3 mM), t-BuOK (6 mM),
current density = 3 mA cm−2, charge = 2 F mol−1, room temperature.
b
Determined by GC with a chiral column.
GC electrode (Table 2, entry 1), it is still significantly lower than
those on metal electrodes. The order of metal electrodes in the
reactivity was Pt > Cu ≈ Ni (Table 2, entries 2−4). On the other
hand, there is almost no difference in the enantioselectivity of
the products on the tested electrodes. Therefore, it is inferred
that, in the asymmetric electroreduction of the substrate
participated by the Ru complex, the cathode material only
affects the yield of the product but hardly affects the optical
activity.
Then, the influence of charge amount was investigated.
Generally, the electroreduction of aromatic ketones involves two
electrons and two protons. In other words, the theoretical
amount of electricity for electroreduction of aromatic ketones is
2 F mol−1. As mentioned earlier, the product yield is 96%, which
is very close to 100%, when the charge amount is 2 F mol−1. It
indicates that the efficiency of this electrosynthesis process is
In order to further understand the reaction system, cyclic
voltammograms (CVs) have been carried out. Due to the serious
Figure 1. Influence of the charge amount on the enantioselective electroreduction of 2,2,2-trifluoroacetophenone. Red: electrolysis only (E). Blue:
stirring for a certain time after electrolysis (E&S).
B
J. Org. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX