S.-C.A. Lin et al.
Molecular Catalysis 466 (2019) 46–51
Table 1
In order to understand more about the pathway of the catalytic
process, we set up few experiments to study the nature of the catalyst
and possible intermediates operated in the catalysis. First, the kinetics
of the resultant reaction profile for the reduction of p-nitrotoulene
catalyzed by 1 was performed (Fig. 4). It appears that there is a very
short induction period for this catalytic system. p-Tolylhydroxylamine,
a key intermidate, is generated at the beginning of the catalysis, and it
remains as a constant concentration in the first two hours. After that,
this species decreases slowly and eventually converted into the product
at the end the reaction. The amount of p-toluidine cumulates gradually
from the beginning and reaches to a full conversion at the end. It is
noticed that p,p'-azoxytoluene appears after 1.5 h and remains as a very
low concentration along the reaction and diminishes finally. From these
observations, it seems that the reduction of p-nitrotoluene catalyzed by
selected bond distances (Å) and angles (deg).
Ru(1)-N(1)
Ru(1)-N(2)
Ru(1)-Cl(1)
N(2)-Ru(1)-N(1)
Cl(1)-Ru(1)-N(2)
Cl(1)-Ru(1)-N(1)
2.075(4)
2.137(4)
2.383(1)
77.5(2)
88.2(1)
83.6(1)
Ru(2)-N(5)
Ru(2)-N(4)
Ru(2)-Cl(2)
N(4)-Ru(2)-N(5)
Cl(2)-Ru(2)-N(4)
Cl(2)-Ru(2)-N(5)
2.068(4)
2.120(4)
2.390(1)
77.5(2)
88.1(1)
80.1(1)
1
proceeds via pathway A (Scheme 1). However, we are not able to
exclude the possibility of pathway B due to the appearance of trace p,p'-
azoxytoluene. Thus, we carried out a series of testing to find out the
reactivity of catalytic system toward various possible intermediates
under the optimized conditions.
Fig. 3. Side view of cationic portion of 1 (30% probability level).
The product distribution under the optimal catalytic conditions was
examined with p-nitrosotoluene as the substrate (Table 3, entry a).
Within 2 h, this substrate was fully converted into a mixture of p,p'-
azoxytoluene, toluidine, p,p’-azotoluene and 1,2-di-p-tolylhydrazine
with the major portion (61%) of azoxytoluene. For a longer period
(20 h), the final reduction product (toluidine) did not increase much,
whereas the amount of p,p’-azotoluene, which is the reduction product
of azoxytoluene, increased slightly. On starting with p,p'-azoxytoluene,
minor portion of reduction products were obtained, while more than
Table 1. All Ru-N bond lengths are quite similar, at 2.07–2.13 Å, which
are in agreement with those of the reported bipyridine ruthenium
complexes. Both angles of N(1)-Ru(1)-N(2) [77.5(2)°] and N(4)-Ru(2)-N
(
5) [77.5(2)°], deviated from 90°, are comparable to those of [(bipyr-
idine)RuCl(L)] presumably due to the geometrical constrain of donors.
The average Ru-C(benzene) distances (2.183(5) Å) are in the normal range
6
…
of η coordination modes. The distance of Ru(1) ·Ru(2) is 5.4170(5) Å,
indicating that two metal centers are far away from each other. No
significant discrepancies in other bond lengths and angles are noticed in
complex 1. An interesting observation is the ligand itself is not seated in
a plane of this crystal structure, as illustrated in Fig. 3. The chelating
ring with Ru(2) is twisted and the metal center is above the coordina-
tion plane. The torsional angles of N(4)-C(16)-C(17)-N(5) is -17.1°,
which is larger than that of N(1)-C(5)-C(6)-N(2) [- 4.5°]. Presumably,
this is due to the steric congestion caused by the coordinating ligands.
75% of substrate remained un-reacted (Table 3, entry b), indicating that
the activity of 1 on reduction of azoxybenzenes is poor. Meanwhile,
treatment of azotoluene under the catalytic conditions provided the
1,2-di-p-tolylhydrazine as the major reduction product accompanied
with trace amount of toluidine (Table 3, entry c). Similarly, the dir-
uthenium complex 1 showed a poor activity on the conversion of 1,2-di-
p-tolylhydrazine into the desired product toluidine (Table 3, entry d).
On the contrary, on using p-hydroxyaminotoluene as the substrate,
complex 1 granted a full conversion of the substrate to p-toluidine
3.2. Reduction of nitro-compounds
(
Table 3, entry e). Unlike nitrosotoluene as the substrate (entry a), the
It is well-documented that transition metal complexes are frequently
reduction of p-hydroxyaminotoluene under the optimal conditions did
not give any accumulation of p,p'-azoxytoluene, a condensation of ni-
trosotoluene with p-hydroxyaminotoluene, indicating that the hydro-
xylamine is directly reduced to the final product [10–13].
Some generalizations can be made from the above control reactions.
2 4
The catalytic process by complex 1 with N H in the reduction of ni-
troarene undergoes preferentially via the direct reduction of hydro-
xyaminoarene. The catalytic system has poor activity on reduction of
azoxy- and azo-arenes as compared to hydroxyaminoarenes, i.e. the
activity of complex 1 is quite poor on the reductive cleavage of NeN
bonds. Furthermore, once the nitrosoarene species appears in the re-
action medium, the formation of azoxy species cannot be avoided, i.e.
the rate of condensation of hydroxyaminoarene with nitrosoarene is
comparable to the reduction steps. To our surprise, the catalyst showed
a poor activity toward nitrosotoluene, which is generally known to be
the key intermediate of this reduction (Scheme 1).
used as catalysts for reduction of nitroarenes [8]. Accordingly, the ac-
tivity of the diruthenium complex 1 on reduction of nitroarenes with
hydrazine as the reductant was investigated [9]. For the optimization,
we chose the reduction of p-nitrotoluene as the model reaction with 1 as
the pre-catalyst. A control experiment clearly showed the essentiality of
a metal complex playing the role of catalysis (Table 2, entry 1). After
several trials, it appears that a full conversion was achieved by carrying
out the reaction using excess of hydrazine in the presence of 0.25 mol%
of catalyst in an ethanol solution at 80 °C (Table 2, entry 2). Various
solvents were screened and alcohols were found to be the best choice
(
Table 2, entries 2–8). Other solvents gave poor results. It is noticed that
N-hydroxy-p-toluidine and 4,4′-azoxytoluene were produced in an
acetonitrile solution (Table 2, entry 4). By lowering the ratio of hy-
drazine/nitrotoluene to 2:1, we were still able to obtain the full re-
duction product quantitatively even with a shorter period of time (7 h)
(
Table 2, entry 9). By comparison to the outcome of entry 11, the
catalyst loading of 0.25 mol% appeared to be the best choice. By run-
ning the reaction under O atmosphere, the product yield diminished by
For further understanding the reduction pathway whether involving
nitrosotoluene intermediate, we carried out another experiment by
adding nitroso compound into the catalytic reaction. After a standard
reaction of the reduction of nitrotoluene proceeded for 1 h, a quantity
of 30 mol% p-nitrosotoluene was syringed into the reaction mixture.
2
about 50%. Furthermore, the catalysis proceeded smoothly even with
the addition of mercury during the reaction, indicating that the cata-
lytic system is a homogeneous metal-catalyzed reaction. Two ruthe-
1
This reaction mixture was then monitored by H NMR. In this reaction
6
6
nium complexes, [Ru(η -benzene)Cl]
2), were also tested for comparison. However, these two complexes
showed poor activity in this catalytic reduction. (Table 2, entries
4–16). By carrying out the reaction in air, the aniline product was
2
and [(bipy)Ru(η -benzene)Cl]Cl
medium, a mixture of nitrotoluene, p-hydroxyaminotoluene, p,p'-azox-
ytoluene, p,p'-azotoluene and toluidine was identified, i.e. production of
azoxy species appeared immediately. For a longer period, both p,p'-
azoxytoluene and p,p'-azotoluene still remained, which is consistent
with the results of experiments in Table 3 (entries a–d). Clearly, the
appearance of nitroso intermediate in the catalytic process would
(
1
obtained in poor yields accompanied with other intermediates even
with the use of excess of hydrazine (Table 2, entries 17–18).
48