REACTION OF ␣-PHENOXYPROPANOIC ACIDS
33
Figure 6 The Hammett plot on the EDTA catalyzed reaction of phenoxypropanoic acids with CAB (numbered as in Table IV).
ternary intermediate. Enhanced reactivity in the EDTA
catalyzedhydrazine-Cr(VI)reaction[19]andisopropyl
alcohol oxidation by Cr(VI) in the presence of oxalic
acid [20] are explained by envisaging the formation of
a intermolecular complex. Highly negative activation
entropy suggests that there is a highly ordered transi-
tion state.
Enhanced reactivity in the presence of Cl can be
explainedbytheformationofmolecularchlorine, anef-
fective electrophile under the experimental conditions
maintained. kobs is a composite quantity. Attempts have
been made to evaluate the rate coefficients of the slow
step (k3) separately using the intercept of the double
reciprocal plot of 1/kobs vs. 1/[S] at constant [H+] and
[EDTA] (Eq. (7)). Deviation of NO2 substituents in
the established Hammett line using k3 values deter-
mined at high substrate concentrations, is again quite
clear in Fig. 6 (r = 0.530; s = 0.441). The treatment
by the Yukawa–Tsuno equation [21], which can give
an idea regarding the extent of involvement of cross
conjucation in the transition state also fails to explain
the reactivity (100 R 73, where R is the correlation
coefficient).
2. Gurumurthy, R.; Gopalakrishnan, M. Ind J Chem
Sect A 1986, 25, 476.
3. Gurumurthy, R.; Gopalakrishnan, M.; Prabhakaran, A.
Asian J Chem 1989, 1, 7.
4. Gurumurthy,
R.;
Ananthabaskaran,
T.;
J
Sathiyanarayanan, K.; Karunakaran, K. Asian
Chem 1994, 6, 449.
5. Gurumurthy, R.; Karunakaran, K.; Sathiyanarayanan, K.
Oxid Commun 1993, 16(3-4), 351.
6. Trillas, M.; Peral, J.; Domench, X. Appl Catal, B: Envi-
ron 1993, 3(1), 45.
7. Nagarajan, S.; Gopalakrishnan, M. Oxid Commun 1995,
18(2), 162.
8. Karunakaran, K.; Elango, K. P. Oxid Commun 1994,
17(3-4), 274.
9. Elango, K. P.; Karunakaran, K. Oxid Commun 1996,
19(1), 44.
10. Kabilan, S.; Sankar, P.; Krishnasamy, K. Oxid Commun
1994, 17(1-2), 115.
11. Kabilan, S.; Uma, M.; Krishnasamy K.; Sankar, P. J Ind
Council Chem 1994, X(1), 21.
12. Chellamani, A.; Rajeswari, V. Afinidad 1999, 56(483),
322.
13. Karunakaran, K. Pol J Chem 1998, 72, 916.
14. Weissberger, A.; Prabankar, E. S. Organic Solvents
Physical Properties and Methods of Purification, 2nd ed.;
Interscience Publishers: London, 1955; p. 390.
15. Meenakshisundaram, S. P.; Sockalingam, R. M. J Mol
Catal A: Chemical 2000, 160, 269.
16. Norman; Hayes, V.; Gerald; Branch, E. K. J Am Chem
Soc 1943, 65, 1555.
17. Thimme Gowda B.; Mahadevappa, D. S. J Chem Soc
Perkin Trans 1983, 2, 323.
Except COOH substituent, in all the other cases
the ratio of rate constants of ortho- and para-substituted
-PPA is >1 and <2. It suggests that in CAB oxida-
tion of these ortho-derivatives the steric inhibition is
slightly overcompensated by an effective anchimeric
assistance.
18. Mohan, N.; Ananda, S.; Mahadevappa, D. S. Ind J Chem
Sect A 1986, 25, 666.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
19. Beck, M. T.; Durham, D. A. J Inorg Nucl Chem 1971,
33, 461.
20. Hasan, F.; Rocek, J. J Am Chem Soc 1972, 94, 3181.
21. Yukawa, Y.; Tsuno, Y. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1959, 32, 971.
1. Perron, Y. G.; Minor, W. F.; Holdrege, C. T.; Gottstein,
W. J.; Godfrey, J. C.; Crast, L. B.; Babel, R. B.; Cheney,
L. C. J Am Chem Soc 1960, 82, 3934.