G Model
CATTOD-8934; No. of Pages7
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2
P. Phung et al. / Catalysis Today xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
approach has several potential advantages in that air is used as
an oxidant and the catalysts and solvents employed are relatively
non-hazardous and inexpensive.
Accordingly, we report here the batch autoxidation of the
triglyceride BD feedstocks tallow, canola oil and soy bean oil with
air in the presence of metal/bromide catalysts, and an assessment
of the modified cold flow properties of the FAMES derived from this
process.
(ꢀ = 205 nm), using a Phenomenex Luna 5 m C18(2) 100 Å col-
umn (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 m). The mobile phase was a mixture of (A)
methanol, and (B) 2-propanol/hexane (5:4) (HPLC grade), with the
following operating method: (1) an initial mixture consisting of
A:B = 100:0 was ramped to A:B = 50:50 for 15 min; (2) then ramped
to A:B = 0:100 for 5 min and was maintained at A:B = 0:100 for
5 min; (3) the mixture was then allowed to equilibrate to the ini-
tial ratio A:B = 100:0 within 5 min and then run for a further 5 min
before the next analysis was performed. Sample injections were of
20 L, and a total flow rate of 1 mL/min was employed.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
2.3. Oxidation reactions
Cobalt (II) acetate, manganese (II) acetate, zirconium (IV)
chloride, potassium bromide, methyl palmitate, methyl stearate,
anhydrous sodium sulfate, sodium chloride, silica gel, n-hexane,
sulfuric acid, sodium hydrogen carbonate, diethyl ether, and glacial
acetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as received. HPLC grade n-
hexane, 2-propanol and methanol (Labscan) were filtered through
a PTFE filter prior to use. Domestic, food grade tallow (Allowrie
beef dripping), soy bean and canola oil (Crisco) were used as pur-
chased. Dimethyl butandioate, dimethyl pentandioate, dimethyl
hexandioate and dimethyl octandioate were obtained from Fluka.
Methyl butanoate, methyl pentanoate, methyl hexanoate, methyl
heptanoate, methyl octanoate, methyl nonanoate, methyl hexa-
decanoate, methyl octadecanoate, dimethyl heptandioate and
dimethyl nonandioate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All
esters were used as received.
All substrates were oxidised using an Anton Parr 600 mL capac-
ity reactor (Method 1). Some experiments with tallow were also
conducted with a modified procedure referred to as Method 2 (Parr
Instruments Co. 250 mL capacity reactor). Where not specified,
reactant amounts were scaled accordingly to the vessel size.
In a typical experiment (Method 1) the catalyst mixture was
prepared by dissolving cobalt (II) acetate (1.11 g, 4.47 mmol), man-
ganese (II) acetate (1.10 g, 4.47 mmol), zirconium (IV) chloride
(33 mg, 0.14 mmol) and potassium bromide (1.06 g, 8.94 mmol) in
glacial acetic acid (150.0 g, 2.50 mol) and distilled water (12.0 g,
0.66 mol). This mixture was transferred into a stainless steel high-
pressure reactor (Parr, 600 mL capacity, Hastalloy C) to which the
triglyceride fat or oil (8.0 g, approximately 9 mmol, composition
dependent) or the methyl hexadecanoate (8.0 g, 29.6 mmol) were
added. The reactor was then sealed, pre-pressurised to 40 bar (or
50 bar, Method 2) with compressed air and then heated to 150 ◦C
while being stirred by means of an integral PTFE blade mixer
rotating at 500 rpm. Once the temperature reached 150 ◦C, the pres-
sure was adjusted to 70 bar with additional air (if required). The
time required to reach 150 ◦C was approximately 30 min. The sys-
tem was maintained at the reaction temperature for 2 h and then
allowed to cool to room temperature (typically around 30 min) and
depressurised.
2.2. Instrumentation
A Shimadzu Gas Chromatograph (GC-17A) equipped with a FID
detector and a polyethylene glycol column (BP21, 30 m length,
0.25 mm ID) was used for the quantification of reaction products.
Initially the column was kept at 80 ◦C for 2 min and heated to
240 ◦C over 8 min and maintained at 240 ◦C for another 10 min. The
ester products were calibrated from prepared standards contain-
ing known amounts of esters with a known amount of mesitylene
as an external standard. Calibration curves were drawn as (concen-
tration of esters)/(concentration of external standard) on the X-axis
and (area of the ester peak)/(area of external standard peak) on the
Y-axis. We have assumed that the FID response per carbon atom
is the same for those FAMES for which standards were unavail-
able commercially, i.e. methyl decanoate, methyl undecanoate,
ethyl dodecanoate, methyl tridecanoate, methyl tetradecanoate,
methyl pentadecanoate, dimethyl decandioate, dimethyl undecan-
dioate, dimethyl dodecandioate, dimethyl tridecandioate, dimethyl
tetradecandioate, dimethyl pentadecandioate and dimethyl hexa-
decandioate.
2.4. Work-up—Methyl hexadecanoate
Refer to Fig. 1. The liquid products typically appeared as a
dark brown mono-phasic solution. Initially, volatile components
were isolated from the product liquid under reduced pressure on
a Schlenk line (Step 1) and analysed by GC/MS. This product iso-
lation was achieved using two cold traps arranged in series: trap
one was at −78 ◦C (dry ice and acetone) and trap two was at
−196 ◦C (liquid nitrogen). The resultant product liquid was vis-
cous with the formation of some precipitates. Acetic acid (20 mL)
was added to achieve a homogenous solution. Subsequently, it was
dried using silica gel (10 g) and anhydrous Na2SO4 (20–30 g) (Step
2). The drying agents were removed by filtration. The residue was
extracted further with diethyl ether and n-hexane (20 mL each).
Esterification (2–6 h) of the combined organic fractions proceeded
smoothly in excess methanol with concentrated sulfuric acid as
catalyst (3 mol%, calculated based on the conservative assumption
that all of the substrate was acetic acid). The esterified mixture
was neutralised by the addition of solid NaHCO3, and the mixture
subsequently filtered (Step 3). To remove any methyl acetate (orig-
inating from the esterification of acetic acid), the filtered mixture
was subjected to reduced pressure on a rotary evaporator (Step 4:
final volume approx. 15 mL). To purify the esters (Step 5), crude
esters were washed with brine (3 × 10 mL), stirred overnight with
anhydrous Na2SO4 to remove water, filtered and the dried product
evacuated for 90 min on a Schlenk line before conducting cloud and
gel point tests.
A Shimadzu GC/MS (QP 2010 using a fused silica Rtx-5Sil MS
column, 30 m length, 0.25 mm ID) was used to identify the reaction
products. Initially the column was kept at 50 ◦C for 3 min and then
heated at a rate of 15 ◦C/min to 300 ◦C and kept at 300 ◦C for 5 min.
Volatile acids were measured with and without silylation. Com-
pounds were identified using the NIST database and by comparison
to the standards prepared.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed using
a TA Instruments modulated differential scanning calorimeter
(MDSC) 2920 equipped with the Liquid Nitrogen Cooling Acces-
sory (LNCA). Samples were measured at a cooling rate of 1 ◦C/min
from 40 to −30 ◦C.
High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analyses
were used to determine the lack or presence of triglycerides
and diglycerides. The analyses were carried out with a Shimadzu
Prominence HPLC system with a SPD-M20A diode array detector
Please cite this article in press as: P. Phung, et al., Metal/bromide autoxidation of triglycerides for the preparation of FAMES to improve