2
In summary, we have found that a Cu/SiO catalyst for
hydrogenation of DMO to EG using DMO–ethanol feedstock
was more stable than the DMO–methanol feedstock without
any modification of catalysts. The unstable active centers
caused by methanol, the CO splitting from methanol and the
oxidation of alcohol over Cu/SiO2 catalysts are the main
reasons for sintering of copper, which resulted in deactivation
of the catalysts. The stabilization effect of ethanol on the
active centers can effectively slow the increase in the size of the
copper particles.
This work was supported by the National Key Basic
Research Program of China (2011CBA00508).
Fig. 5 FTIR spectra of He–methanol and He–ethanol flow over 25 wt%
Cu/SiO catalyst at 473 K. (A) He–ethanol flow, (B) He–methanol flow.
Notes and references
2
1
(a) H. C. Fuller, Ind. Eng. Chem., 1924, 16, 624; (b) J. M. Hollis,
F. J. Lovas, P. R. Jewell and L. H. Coudert, Astrophys. J., 2002,
5
71, L59.
D. F. Othmer and M. S. Thakar, Ind. Eng. Chem., 1958, 50, 1235.
at 473 K. The results presented in Fig. 5 show that methyl
formate, formaldehyde, CO and CO are the main products of
methanol oxidation over the Cu/SiO catalyst under
He–methanol stream at 473 K. It is widely accepted that the
2
2
3 G. Xu, Y. Li, Z. Li and H. Wang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1995,
34, 2371.
2
4
5
6
Z. Li, Z. Qian, X. Zhao and W. Xiao, Chem. React. Eng. & Tech.,
004, 20, 121.
2
1
7
catalytic oxidation proceeds via the redox cycle. The redox
(a) L. R. Zehner, US Pat., 4005131, 1977; (b) L. R. Zehner and
W. R. Lenton, US Pat., 4112245, 1977.
(a) U. Matteoli, M. Bianchi, G. Menchi, P. Frediani and
F. Piacenti, J. Mol. Catal., 1985, 29, 269; (b) U. Matteoli,
G. Menchi, M. Bianchi and F. Piacenti, J. Organomet. Chem.,
cycle may result in the microscopic transport of surface atoms,
1
5
which accelerates the sintering. It is obvious that methanol
oxidation under reaction conditions is one of the causes of
copper sintering. For He–ethanol stream, the main products
are ethyl acetate and acetaldehyde, meanwhile the production
1986, 299, 233; (c) H. T. Teunissen and C. J. Elsevier, Chem.
Commun., 1997, 667.
7
(a) W. J. Bartley, US Pat., 4628128, 1986; (b) T. Susumu, F. Kozo,
N. Keigo, M. Masaoki and M. Katsuhiko, EU Pat., 0046983,
1987; (c) M. Haruhiko, H. Kouichi, U. Taizou, N. Yasuo,
I. Seizou, T. Takanori, JP Pat., 57123127, 1982.
A. Yin, X. Guo, W. Dai, H. Li and K. Fan, Appl. Catal., A, 2008,
of CO and CO is hardly observed. This fact indicates that,
2
under the reaction conditions, ethanol is more difficult to be
oxidized deeply into CO
2
than methanol and the ethanol
8
9
cannot be split into CO. We suggest that for the He–methanol
stream case the CO produced from methanol can intensify the
redox process of copper and the growing of Cu particles. Also,
the competition chemisorption between CO and DMO may
349, 91.
Z. He, H. Lin, P. He and Y. Yuan, J. Catal., 2010, 277, 54.
1
0 L. Chen, P. Guo, M. Qiao, S. Shen, H. Li, W. Shen, H. Xu and
K. Fan, J. Catal., 2008, 257, 172.
+
0
11 H. Miyazaki, T. Uda, K. Hirai, Y. Nakamura, H. Ikezawa and
T. Tsuchie, US Pat., 4585890, 1986.
disrupt the ratio of Cu /Cu of the active centers which
exacerbates the growing up of Cu particles.
1
2 D. Huang, Z. Chen, F. Chen, P. Lin, H. Lan and Y. He, Chin. Ind.
Catal., 1996, 4, 24.
The results of XRD presented in Fig. 2 and 4 also show that
there are some more aggregations of copper particles when
13 D. J. Thomas, J. T. Wehrli and M. S. Wainwright, Appl. Catal., A,
992, 86, 101.
1
DMO appears in H –methanol feedstock. However, when
2
1
4 (a) A. K. Datye, Q. Xu, K. C. Kharas and J. M. McCarty, Catal.
Today, 2006, 111, 59; (b) S. B. Simonsen, I. Chorkendorff, S. Dahl,
M. Skoglundh, J. Sehested and S. Helveg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010,
DMO appears in H –ethanol feedstock, the copper particles
2
are still homogeneously dispersed on silica. It is suggested that
+
DMO, methanol and ethanol may prefer to adsorb on Cu
1
32, 7968.
1
8
15 (a) S. Komai, T. Hattori, A. Miyamoto and Y. Murakami, Chem.
Lett., 1983, 12, 1749; (b) F. Yang, M. S. Chen and
D. W. Goodman, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 254.
sites. Therefore, adsorption of DMO and methanol (or
ethanol) is competitive under the real reaction conditions.
On account of the weaker reducibility and chemisorption
ability of ethanol than methanol, ethanol oxidation may be
greatly reduced when DMO is present, which can effectively
slow down the agglomeration of active copper species.
On the other hand, the structure of glycol is more similar
with ethanol than methanol. This structural adaptability is in
favor of the stability of the catalytic active centers and the
lifetime of the catalysts.
16 (a) R. Zhang, Y. Sun and S. Peng, Fuel, 2002, 81, 1619;
(
b) S. D. Jackson, D. S. Anderson, G. J. Kelly, T. Lear,
D. Lennon and S. R. Watson, Top. Catal., 2003, 22, 173;
c) A. Y. Rozovskii and G. I. Lin, Top. Catal., 2003, 22, 137.
(
17 (a) D. Dadyburjor, S. Jewur and E. Ruckenstein, Catal. Rev. Sci.
Eng., 1979, 19, 293; (b) H. Kim, J. Yang and H. Jung, Appl. Catal.,
B, 2011, 101, 348.
1
8 (a) E. K. Poels and D. S. Brands, Appl. Catal., A, 2000, 191, 83;
b) A. Yin, X. Guo, W. Dai and K. Fan, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009,
113, 11003.
(
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 1177–1179 1179