Page 3 of 4
ChemComm
DOI: 10.1039/C3CC43948H
c
and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to embody this synergism effect.
Graphene used here as a support is able to anchor the AuꢀPd
nanoparticles with a uniform dispersion during the reaction.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
† Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: More
Experimental Details and Results of Catalyst Characterization and
Reaction Tests. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
60
20
The catalytic performance of AuꢀPd/Graphene is also
related to the loadings of Au and Pd and reaction temperature
1
(a) A. Mamoru, J. Catal. 1982, 77, 279; (b) A.S. Elmi, E. Tronconi,
C. Cristiani, J.P. Gomez, P. Forzatti, G. Busca, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
1989, 28, 387; (c) C. Wang, R.J. Willey, J. Catal., 2001, 202, 211; (d)
H.C. Liu, E. Iglesia, J. Catal., 2004, 223, 161.
5
(
Table 1 and Fig. S7, ESI†). Au2.0ꢀPd1.0/Graphene performs
best in methanol oxidation to MF, with a methanol conversion
of 90.2% and selectivity of 100% to MF at 70 °C (Entry 12);
2
3
4
A. Wittstock, V. Zielasek, J. Biener, C.M. Friend, M. Bäumer,
Science, 2010, 327, 319.
M. Haruta, N. Yamada, T. Kobayashi, S. Lijima, J. Catal., 1989, 115,
301.
(a) G.J. Huctchings, Chem. Commun., 2008, 10, 1148; (b) H. Wang,
H.Q. Zhu, Z.F. Qin, F.X. Liang, G.F. Wang, J.G. Wang, J. Catal.,
–
1
it gives a turnover frequency (TOF) of 0.377 s at 70 °C,
–
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
0
5
0
5
0
5
0
5
0
much higher than the AuꢀAg catalyst with a TOF of 0.11 s
for methanol oxidation at 80 °C reported by Wittstock et al.,
2
suggesting that the AuꢀPd/Graphene catalyst here with much
lower fraction of noble metals is yet more effective for
methanol oxidation to MF than the pure AuꢀAg catalyst.
2
009, 264, 154.
5
6
7
B. Xu, X. Liu, J. Haubrich, R.J. Madix, C.M. Friend, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 4206.
J. Xu, T. White, P. Li, C.H. He, J.G. Yu, W.K. Yuan, Y.F. Han, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 10398.
(a) D.I. Enache, J.K. Edwards, P. Landon, B. Solsona, A.F. Carley,
A.A. Herzing, M. Watanabe, C.J. Kiely, D.W. Knight, G.J.
Hutchings, Science, 2006, 311, 362; (b) D. Wang, A. Villa, F. Porta,
D. Su, L. Prati, Chem. Commun., 2006, 18, 1956.
A long term test of 48 h was conducted over the Au2.0
ꢀ
Pd1.0/Graphene catalyst at 70 °C (Fig. S8, ESI†). It exhibits a
good stability throughout the test; the conversion of methanol
remains above 85% and the selectivity to MF is fixed at 100%.
During the test, only MF and methanol are detected in the
effluents; by comparing the mass of methanol consumed with
that of the products formed, a well carbon mass balance is
obtained; the fraction of unclaimed carbonꢀcontaining
products is less than 4%, suggesting that the formation of any
other byproducts is negligible (Table S2, ESI†).
A comparison of the TEM image of the spent catalyst with
that of the fresh one indicates that the particle size is only
increased slightly from 7.4 to 7.9 nm and the Au L3 edge
EXAFS results also suggest that the local structural
environment of Au is almost unchanged after the reaction
(Figs. S5 and S9, ESI†), suggesting that the AuꢀPd bimetallic
nanoparticles and twined AuꢀPd alloy structure are stable
during the methanol oxidation under current conditions.
8
9
M.H.A. Rahim, M.M Forde, R.L. Jenkins, C. Hammond, Q. He, N.
Dimitratos, J.A. LopezꢀSanchez, A.F. Carley, S.H. Taylor, D.J.
Willock, D.M. Murphy, C.J. Kiely, G.J. Hutchings, Angew.Chem. Int.
Ed., 2012, 51, 1.
L. Kesavan, R. Tiruvalam, M.H.A. Rahim, M.I.B. Saiman, D.I.
Enache, R.L. Jenkins, N. Dimitratos, J.A.L. Sanchez, S.H. Taylor,
D.W. Knight, C.J. Kiely, G.J. Hutching, Science, 2011, 331, 195.
R.P. Shi, H. Wang, H.Q. Zhu, Z.W. Wu, Z.F. Qin, W.B. Fan, J.G.
Wang, J. Fuel. Chem. Tech., 2012, 40, 985.
1
1
0
1
H. Chen, Y. Li, F.B. Zhang, G.L. Zhang, X.B. Fan, J. Mater. Chem.,
2
011, 21, 17658.
12 (a) X.M. Chen, G.H. Wu, J.M. Chen, X. Chen, Z.X. Xie, X.R. Wang,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 3693; (b) R. Muszynski, B. Seger,
P.V. Kamat, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 5263; (c) P. Kundu, C.
Nethravathi, P.A. Deshpande, M. Rajamathi, G. Madras, N.
Ravishankar, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 2772; (d) S. Liu, J.Q. Tian, L.
Wang, H.L. Li, Y.W. Zhang, X.P. Sun, Macromolecules, 2010, 43,
10078; (e) R. Awasthi, R.N. Singh, Carbon, 2013, 51, 282; (f) S.
Zhang, Y. Shao, H.G. Liao, J. Liu, I.A. Aksay, G. Yin, Y. Lin, Chem.
Mater., 2011, 23, 1079.
Au2.0ꢀPd1.0/Graphene catalyst performs excellently in the
selective oxidation of methanol to MF by molecular oxygen,
which may be attributed to the following factors: Firstly, the
graphene has a large surface area allowing a fine and uniform
dispersion of the AuꢀPd bimetallic nanoparticles, which may
provide abundant active sites. Secondly, the AuꢀPd
nanoparticles tend to form a twinꢀparticles structure with
Au&Pd (111) planes, which will be of benefit to the catalytic
reaction. Thirdly, a synergism is present between the Au and
Pd particles with electronic exchange. Lastly, the conductive
characteristic of graphene may promote the electronic
exchange between Au and Pd and even supply π electrons to
1
3
(a) C.M. Chen, Q. Zhang, M.G. Yang, C.H. Huang, Y.G. Yang, M.Z.
Wang, Carbon, 2012, 50, 3572; (b) C. Xu, X. Wang, J. Zhu, J. Phys.
Chem. C, 2008, 112, 19841.
14 (a) S. Hermans, A. Deffernez, M. Devillers, Appl. Catal. A, 2011,
95, 19; (b) G. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Zhou, Y.
3
Tang, L. Lu, J. Bao, T. Lu, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 102, 614.
D.A. Bulushev, I. Yuranov, E.I. Suvorova, P.A. Buffat, L. Kiwiꢀ
Minsker, J. Catal. 2004, 224, 8.
1
5
16 Y.S. Lee, Y.S. Jeon, Y.D. Chung, K.Y. Lim, C.M. Whang, S.J. Oh, J.
Korea Phys. Soc., 2000, 37, 451.
17 C. Hsu, C. Huang, Y. Hao, F. Liu, Electrochem. Comm., 2012, 23,
2
1
AuꢀPd nanoparticles,
which can then strengthen the
1
33.
synergism of AuꢀPd and enhance the catalytic performance.
The authors thank Dr. S. Zhang and Prof. Y. Huang et al. in
Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility for the help in
EXAFS measurements as well as the financial supports of
National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB201400),
Natural Science Foundation of China (21227002, 21203231)
and Shanxi Province of China (2011011006ꢀ3, 2012021005ꢀ3).
1
8
(a) M. Sankar, N. Dimitratos, P.J. Miedziak, P.P. Wells, C.J. Kiely,
G.J. Hutchings, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 8099; (b) P.
Kittisakmontree, B. Pongthawornsakun, H. Yoshida, S. Fujita, M.
Arai, J. Panpranot, J. Catal., 2013, 297, 155.
1
2
2
9
0
1
X.W. Teng, Q. Wang, P. Liu, W.Q. Han, A. Frenkel, W. Wen, N.
Marinkovic, J.C. Hanson, J.A. Rodriguez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
1
30, 1093.
C.M. Chen, Q. Zhang, J.Q. Huang, W. Zhang, X.C. Zhao, C.H.
Huang, F. Wei, Y.G. Yang, M.Z. Wang, D.S. Su, J. Mater. Chem.,
2
012, 22, 13947.
Notes and references
K.S. Subrahmanyam, A.K. Manna, S.K. Pati, C.N.R. Rao, Chem.
Phys. Lett., 2010, 497, 70.
a
State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry,
5
5
Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 165, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, PR
China. E-mail: qzhf@sxicc.ac.cn (Z. Qin); iccjgw@sxicc.ac.cn (J. Wang)
Key Laboratory of Carbon Materials, Institute of Coal Chemistry, the
b
Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 165, Taiyuan 030001, PR China
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry [year]
Journal Name, [year], [vol], 00–00 | 3